Cargando…
Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
BACKGROUND: Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7815-9 |
_version_ | 1783465653548613632 |
---|---|
author | Malmgren Fänge, A. Carlsson, G. Axmon, A. Thordardottir, B. Chiatti, C. Nilsson, M. H. Ekstam, L. |
author_facet | Malmgren Fänge, A. Carlsson, G. Axmon, A. Thordardottir, B. Chiatti, C. Nilsson, M. H. Ekstam, L. |
author_sort | Malmgren Fänge, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better maintain or improve client outcomes over 1 year. METHOD: Using a cluster design, South Swedish municipalities were recruited to an intervention or control group. Data on activities of daily living, usability of the home, health related quality of life, and participation frequency and satisfaction were collected at home visits 1 month before the HA (baseline; T1), and at 3 (T2), 6 (T3) and 12 (T4) months after. In the intervention group (n = 112) data were collected according to a standardized protocol while in the control group (n = 129) ordinary routines were applied. Changes from baseline to subsequent time points were categorized as no deterioration (i.e. improvement or no change) or deterioration, for each outcome item separately. Differences in “no deterioration” between the groups were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Little effect of using the standardized protocol was detected. For activities of daily living, statistically significant differences between the groups were found for toileting (T1-T4; OR 3.14), dressing (T1-T4; OR2.89) and cooking (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 3.14). For usability of the home differences were found in personal hygiene (T1-T2; OR 2.32) using a wheelchair (T1-T2 and T1-T3; OR 9.50), picking up the mail (T1-T3; OR 4.06), and in participation, helping others (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 2.33 and 3.36). CONCLUSION: The applied standardized protocol for HA implementation did not show any convincing effect, possibly due to the complexity of the intervention itself, and the implementation process. A process evaluation might generate in-depth knowledge about the reasons behind the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01960582. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68298452019-11-07 Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study Malmgren Fänge, A. Carlsson, G. Axmon, A. Thordardottir, B. Chiatti, C. Nilsson, M. H. Ekstam, L. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better maintain or improve client outcomes over 1 year. METHOD: Using a cluster design, South Swedish municipalities were recruited to an intervention or control group. Data on activities of daily living, usability of the home, health related quality of life, and participation frequency and satisfaction were collected at home visits 1 month before the HA (baseline; T1), and at 3 (T2), 6 (T3) and 12 (T4) months after. In the intervention group (n = 112) data were collected according to a standardized protocol while in the control group (n = 129) ordinary routines were applied. Changes from baseline to subsequent time points were categorized as no deterioration (i.e. improvement or no change) or deterioration, for each outcome item separately. Differences in “no deterioration” between the groups were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Little effect of using the standardized protocol was detected. For activities of daily living, statistically significant differences between the groups were found for toileting (T1-T4; OR 3.14), dressing (T1-T4; OR2.89) and cooking (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 3.14). For usability of the home differences were found in personal hygiene (T1-T2; OR 2.32) using a wheelchair (T1-T2 and T1-T3; OR 9.50), picking up the mail (T1-T3; OR 4.06), and in participation, helping others (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 2.33 and 3.36). CONCLUSION: The applied standardized protocol for HA implementation did not show any convincing effect, possibly due to the complexity of the intervention itself, and the implementation process. A process evaluation might generate in-depth knowledge about the reasons behind the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01960582. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829845/ /pubmed/31684916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7815-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Malmgren Fänge, A. Carlsson, G. Axmon, A. Thordardottir, B. Chiatti, C. Nilsson, M. H. Ekstam, L. Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
title | Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
title_full | Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
title_fullStr | Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
title_short | Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
title_sort | effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7815-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malmgrenfangea effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy AT carlssong effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy AT axmona effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy AT thordardottirb effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy AT chiattic effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy AT nilssonmh effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy AT ekstaml effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy |