Cargando…

Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND: Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malmgren Fänge, A., Carlsson, G., Axmon, A., Thordardottir, B., Chiatti, C., Nilsson, M. H., Ekstam, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7815-9
_version_ 1783465653548613632
author Malmgren Fänge, A.
Carlsson, G.
Axmon, A.
Thordardottir, B.
Chiatti, C.
Nilsson, M. H.
Ekstam, L.
author_facet Malmgren Fänge, A.
Carlsson, G.
Axmon, A.
Thordardottir, B.
Chiatti, C.
Nilsson, M. H.
Ekstam, L.
author_sort Malmgren Fänge, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better maintain or improve client outcomes over 1 year. METHOD: Using a cluster design, South Swedish municipalities were recruited to an intervention or control group. Data on activities of daily living, usability of the home, health related quality of life, and participation frequency and satisfaction were collected at home visits 1 month before the HA (baseline; T1), and at 3 (T2), 6 (T3) and 12 (T4) months after. In the intervention group (n = 112) data were collected according to a standardized protocol while in the control group (n = 129) ordinary routines were applied. Changes from baseline to subsequent time points were categorized as no deterioration (i.e. improvement or no change) or deterioration, for each outcome item separately. Differences in “no deterioration” between the groups were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Little effect of using the standardized protocol was detected. For activities of daily living, statistically significant differences between the groups were found for toileting (T1-T4; OR 3.14), dressing (T1-T4; OR2.89) and cooking (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 3.14). For usability of the home differences were found in personal hygiene (T1-T2; OR 2.32) using a wheelchair (T1-T2 and T1-T3; OR 9.50), picking up the mail (T1-T3; OR 4.06), and in participation, helping others (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 2.33 and 3.36). CONCLUSION: The applied standardized protocol for HA implementation did not show any convincing effect, possibly due to the complexity of the intervention itself, and the implementation process. A process evaluation might generate in-depth knowledge about the reasons behind the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01960582.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68298452019-11-07 Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study Malmgren Fänge, A. Carlsson, G. Axmon, A. Thordardottir, B. Chiatti, C. Nilsson, M. H. Ekstam, L. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better maintain or improve client outcomes over 1 year. METHOD: Using a cluster design, South Swedish municipalities were recruited to an intervention or control group. Data on activities of daily living, usability of the home, health related quality of life, and participation frequency and satisfaction were collected at home visits 1 month before the HA (baseline; T1), and at 3 (T2), 6 (T3) and 12 (T4) months after. In the intervention group (n = 112) data were collected according to a standardized protocol while in the control group (n = 129) ordinary routines were applied. Changes from baseline to subsequent time points were categorized as no deterioration (i.e. improvement or no change) or deterioration, for each outcome item separately. Differences in “no deterioration” between the groups were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Little effect of using the standardized protocol was detected. For activities of daily living, statistically significant differences between the groups were found for toileting (T1-T4; OR 3.14), dressing (T1-T4; OR2.89) and cooking (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 3.14). For usability of the home differences were found in personal hygiene (T1-T2; OR 2.32) using a wheelchair (T1-T2 and T1-T3; OR 9.50), picking up the mail (T1-T3; OR 4.06), and in participation, helping others (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 2.33 and 3.36). CONCLUSION: The applied standardized protocol for HA implementation did not show any convincing effect, possibly due to the complexity of the intervention itself, and the implementation process. A process evaluation might generate in-depth knowledge about the reasons behind the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01960582. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829845/ /pubmed/31684916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7815-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malmgren Fänge, A.
Carlsson, G.
Axmon, A.
Thordardottir, B.
Chiatti, C.
Nilsson, M. H.
Ekstam, L.
Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
title Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
title_full Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
title_fullStr Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
title_short Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
title_sort effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation – results from a quasi-experimental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7815-9
work_keys_str_mv AT malmgrenfangea effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT carlssong effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT axmona effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT thordardottirb effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT chiattic effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT nilssonmh effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT ekstaml effectsofapplyingastandardizedassessmentandevaluationprotocolinhousingadaptationimplementationresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy