Cargando…
Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9
BACKGROUND: PDX1.2 has recently been shown to be a regulator of vitamin B(6) biosynthesis in plants and is implicated in biotic and abiotic stress resistance. PDX1.2 expression is strongly and rapidly induced by heat stress. Interestingly, PDX1.2 is restricted to eudicota, wherein it behaves as a no...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2071-9 |
_version_ | 1783465654268985344 |
---|---|
author | Dell’Aglio, Elisa Dalvit, Ivan Loubéry, Sylvain Fitzpatrick, Teresa B. |
author_facet | Dell’Aglio, Elisa Dalvit, Ivan Loubéry, Sylvain Fitzpatrick, Teresa B. |
author_sort | Dell’Aglio, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: PDX1.2 has recently been shown to be a regulator of vitamin B(6) biosynthesis in plants and is implicated in biotic and abiotic stress resistance. PDX1.2 expression is strongly and rapidly induced by heat stress. Interestingly, PDX1.2 is restricted to eudicota, wherein it behaves as a non-catalytic pseudoenzyme and is suggested to provide an adaptive advantage to this clade. A first report on an Arabidopsis insertion mutant claims that PDX1.2 is indispensable for viability, being essential for embryogenesis. However, a later study using an independent insertion allele suggests that knockout mutants of pdx1.2 are viable. Therefore, the essentiality of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability is a matter of debate. Given the important implications of PDX1.2 in stress responses, it is imperative to clarify if it is essential for plant viability. RESULTS: We have studied the previously reported insertion alleles of PDX1.2, one of which is claimed to be essential for embryogenesis (pdx1.2–1), whereas the other is viable (pdx1.2–2). Our study shows that pdx1.2–1 carries multiple T-DNA insertions, but the T-DNA insertion in PDX1.2 is not responsible for the loss of embryogenesis. By contrast, the pdx1.2–2 allele is an overexpressor of PDX1.2 under standard growth conditions and not a null allele as previously reported. Nonetheless, upregulation of PDX1.2 expression under heat stress is impaired in this mutant line. In wild type Arabidopsis, studies of PDX1.2-YFP fusion proteins show that the protein is enhanced under heat stress conditions. To clarify if PDX1.2 is essential for Arabidopsis viability, we generated several independent mutant lines using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology. All of these lines are viable and behave similar to wild type under standard growth conditions. Reciprocal crosses of a subset of the CRISPR lines with pdx1.2–1 recovers viability of the latter line and demonstrates that knocking out the functionality of PDX1.2 does not impair embryogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Gene editing reveals that PDX1.2 is dispensable for Arabidopsis viability and resolves conflicting reports in the literature on its function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68298482019-11-07 Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 Dell’Aglio, Elisa Dalvit, Ivan Loubéry, Sylvain Fitzpatrick, Teresa B. BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: PDX1.2 has recently been shown to be a regulator of vitamin B(6) biosynthesis in plants and is implicated in biotic and abiotic stress resistance. PDX1.2 expression is strongly and rapidly induced by heat stress. Interestingly, PDX1.2 is restricted to eudicota, wherein it behaves as a non-catalytic pseudoenzyme and is suggested to provide an adaptive advantage to this clade. A first report on an Arabidopsis insertion mutant claims that PDX1.2 is indispensable for viability, being essential for embryogenesis. However, a later study using an independent insertion allele suggests that knockout mutants of pdx1.2 are viable. Therefore, the essentiality of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability is a matter of debate. Given the important implications of PDX1.2 in stress responses, it is imperative to clarify if it is essential for plant viability. RESULTS: We have studied the previously reported insertion alleles of PDX1.2, one of which is claimed to be essential for embryogenesis (pdx1.2–1), whereas the other is viable (pdx1.2–2). Our study shows that pdx1.2–1 carries multiple T-DNA insertions, but the T-DNA insertion in PDX1.2 is not responsible for the loss of embryogenesis. By contrast, the pdx1.2–2 allele is an overexpressor of PDX1.2 under standard growth conditions and not a null allele as previously reported. Nonetheless, upregulation of PDX1.2 expression under heat stress is impaired in this mutant line. In wild type Arabidopsis, studies of PDX1.2-YFP fusion proteins show that the protein is enhanced under heat stress conditions. To clarify if PDX1.2 is essential for Arabidopsis viability, we generated several independent mutant lines using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology. All of these lines are viable and behave similar to wild type under standard growth conditions. Reciprocal crosses of a subset of the CRISPR lines with pdx1.2–1 recovers viability of the latter line and demonstrates that knocking out the functionality of PDX1.2 does not impair embryogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Gene editing reveals that PDX1.2 is dispensable for Arabidopsis viability and resolves conflicting reports in the literature on its function. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829848/ /pubmed/31684863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2071-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dell’Aglio, Elisa Dalvit, Ivan Loubéry, Sylvain Fitzpatrick, Teresa B. Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 |
title | Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 |
title_full | Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 |
title_fullStr | Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 |
title_short | Clarification of the dispensability of PDX1.2 for Arabidopsis viability using CRISPR/Cas9 |
title_sort | clarification of the dispensability of pdx1.2 for arabidopsis viability using crispr/cas9 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2071-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dellaglioelisa clarificationofthedispensabilityofpdx12forarabidopsisviabilityusingcrisprcas9 AT dalvitivan clarificationofthedispensabilityofpdx12forarabidopsisviabilityusingcrisprcas9 AT louberysylvain clarificationofthedispensabilityofpdx12forarabidopsisviabilityusingcrisprcas9 AT fitzpatrickteresab clarificationofthedispensabilityofpdx12forarabidopsisviabilityusingcrisprcas9 |