Cargando…
Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the antimicrobial effect and pH of two calcium silicate cements Mineral trioxide aggregate high plasticity (Angelus PR, Brazil) and iRoot BP Plus (BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) and new bioactive restorative resin composite restor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0933-z |
_version_ | 1783465683513769984 |
---|---|
author | ElReash, Ashraf Abou Hamama, Hamdi Eldars, Waleed Lingwei, Gong Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M. Xiaoli, Xie |
author_facet | ElReash, Ashraf Abou Hamama, Hamdi Eldars, Waleed Lingwei, Gong Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M. Xiaoli, Xie |
author_sort | ElReash, Ashraf Abou |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the antimicrobial effect and pH of two calcium silicate cements Mineral trioxide aggregate high plasticity (Angelus PR, Brazil) and iRoot BP Plus (BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) and new bioactive restorative resin composite restorative material (ACTIVA, MA, Pulpdent, USA) against aerobic bacteria, strictly anaerobic bacteria and a yeast by using an agar diffusion test. METHODS: The materials were tested immediately after manipulation and were applied to the agar plates. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 5.25% was used as a positive control group. The dry filter paper acted as a negative control group for this study. The size of the inhibition zone for each material was measured after 12, 24 and 48 h. At the time of pH measurement; materials were prepared, crushed then dispersed in distilled water. RESULTS: The one-way Anova test revealed that iRoot BP Plus significantly showed superior antimicrobial efficacy compared to MTA-HP against the following species; Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and Candida albicans (P < 0.05). All of the tested materials did not show any antimicrobial effect against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinomyces israelii. The new bioactive resin composite material (ACTIVA) showed the least antimicrobial activity against the previously mentioned microorganisms except E. faecalis. NaOCl significantly showed the highest antimicrobial activity among the test group (P < 0.05). iRoot BP Plus was more alkaline (pH 12.1 ± 0.14/ 11.9 ± 0.25) in comparison to MTA-HP (pH 11.6 ± 0.16/ 11.2 ± 0.10) while ACTIVA was slightly acidic (pH 5.4 ± 0.09/ 6.5 ± 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, it was concluded that calcium silicate- based cements showed a potential antimicrobial activity mainly due to its high alkalinity. The new bioactive resin composite restorative material exhibits less antimicrobial activity due to its resinous ingredients and slightly acidic nature. Antimicrobial effect of calcium silicate cements against strictly anaerobic bacterial species is still questionable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68299742019-11-08 Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material ElReash, Ashraf Abou Hamama, Hamdi Eldars, Waleed Lingwei, Gong Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M. Xiaoli, Xie BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the antimicrobial effect and pH of two calcium silicate cements Mineral trioxide aggregate high plasticity (Angelus PR, Brazil) and iRoot BP Plus (BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) and new bioactive restorative resin composite restorative material (ACTIVA, MA, Pulpdent, USA) against aerobic bacteria, strictly anaerobic bacteria and a yeast by using an agar diffusion test. METHODS: The materials were tested immediately after manipulation and were applied to the agar plates. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 5.25% was used as a positive control group. The dry filter paper acted as a negative control group for this study. The size of the inhibition zone for each material was measured after 12, 24 and 48 h. At the time of pH measurement; materials were prepared, crushed then dispersed in distilled water. RESULTS: The one-way Anova test revealed that iRoot BP Plus significantly showed superior antimicrobial efficacy compared to MTA-HP against the following species; Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and Candida albicans (P < 0.05). All of the tested materials did not show any antimicrobial effect against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinomyces israelii. The new bioactive resin composite material (ACTIVA) showed the least antimicrobial activity against the previously mentioned microorganisms except E. faecalis. NaOCl significantly showed the highest antimicrobial activity among the test group (P < 0.05). iRoot BP Plus was more alkaline (pH 12.1 ± 0.14/ 11.9 ± 0.25) in comparison to MTA-HP (pH 11.6 ± 0.16/ 11.2 ± 0.10) while ACTIVA was slightly acidic (pH 5.4 ± 0.09/ 6.5 ± 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, it was concluded that calcium silicate- based cements showed a potential antimicrobial activity mainly due to its high alkalinity. The new bioactive resin composite restorative material exhibits less antimicrobial activity due to its resinous ingredients and slightly acidic nature. Antimicrobial effect of calcium silicate cements against strictly anaerobic bacterial species is still questionable. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829974/ /pubmed/31684929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0933-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article ElReash, Ashraf Abou Hamama, Hamdi Eldars, Waleed Lingwei, Gong Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M. Xiaoli, Xie Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
title | Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
title_full | Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
title_short | Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
title_sort | antimicrobial activity and ph measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0933-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elreashashrafabou antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial AT hamamahamdi antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial AT eldarswaleed antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial AT lingweigong antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial AT zaeneldinahmedm antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial AT xiaolixie antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial |