Cargando…

Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the antimicrobial effect and pH of two calcium silicate cements Mineral trioxide aggregate high plasticity (Angelus PR, Brazil) and iRoot BP Plus (BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) and new bioactive restorative resin composite restor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElReash, Ashraf Abou, Hamama, Hamdi, Eldars, Waleed, Lingwei, Gong, Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M., Xiaoli, Xie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0933-z
_version_ 1783465683513769984
author ElReash, Ashraf Abou
Hamama, Hamdi
Eldars, Waleed
Lingwei, Gong
Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M.
Xiaoli, Xie
author_facet ElReash, Ashraf Abou
Hamama, Hamdi
Eldars, Waleed
Lingwei, Gong
Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M.
Xiaoli, Xie
author_sort ElReash, Ashraf Abou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the antimicrobial effect and pH of two calcium silicate cements Mineral trioxide aggregate high plasticity (Angelus PR, Brazil) and iRoot BP Plus (BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) and new bioactive restorative resin composite restorative material (ACTIVA, MA, Pulpdent, USA) against aerobic bacteria, strictly anaerobic bacteria and a yeast by using an agar diffusion test. METHODS: The materials were tested immediately after manipulation and were applied to the agar plates. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 5.25% was used as a positive control group. The dry filter paper acted as a negative control group for this study. The size of the inhibition zone for each material was measured after 12, 24 and 48 h. At the time of pH measurement; materials were prepared, crushed then dispersed in distilled water. RESULTS: The one-way Anova test revealed that iRoot BP Plus significantly showed superior antimicrobial efficacy compared to MTA-HP against the following species; Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and Candida albicans (P < 0.05). All of the tested materials did not show any antimicrobial effect against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinomyces israelii. The new bioactive resin composite material (ACTIVA) showed the least antimicrobial activity against the previously mentioned microorganisms except E. faecalis. NaOCl significantly showed the highest antimicrobial activity among the test group (P < 0.05). iRoot BP Plus was more alkaline (pH 12.1 ± 0.14/ 11.9 ± 0.25) in comparison to MTA-HP (pH 11.6 ± 0.16/ 11.2 ± 0.10) while ACTIVA was slightly acidic (pH 5.4 ± 0.09/ 6.5 ± 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, it was concluded that calcium silicate- based cements showed a potential antimicrobial activity mainly due to its high alkalinity. The new bioactive resin composite restorative material exhibits less antimicrobial activity due to its resinous ingredients and slightly acidic nature. Antimicrobial effect of calcium silicate cements against strictly anaerobic bacterial species is still questionable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68299742019-11-08 Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material ElReash, Ashraf Abou Hamama, Hamdi Eldars, Waleed Lingwei, Gong Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M. Xiaoli, Xie BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the antimicrobial effect and pH of two calcium silicate cements Mineral trioxide aggregate high plasticity (Angelus PR, Brazil) and iRoot BP Plus (BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) and new bioactive restorative resin composite restorative material (ACTIVA, MA, Pulpdent, USA) against aerobic bacteria, strictly anaerobic bacteria and a yeast by using an agar diffusion test. METHODS: The materials were tested immediately after manipulation and were applied to the agar plates. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 5.25% was used as a positive control group. The dry filter paper acted as a negative control group for this study. The size of the inhibition zone for each material was measured after 12, 24 and 48 h. At the time of pH measurement; materials were prepared, crushed then dispersed in distilled water. RESULTS: The one-way Anova test revealed that iRoot BP Plus significantly showed superior antimicrobial efficacy compared to MTA-HP against the following species; Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and Candida albicans (P < 0.05). All of the tested materials did not show any antimicrobial effect against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinomyces israelii. The new bioactive resin composite material (ACTIVA) showed the least antimicrobial activity against the previously mentioned microorganisms except E. faecalis. NaOCl significantly showed the highest antimicrobial activity among the test group (P < 0.05). iRoot BP Plus was more alkaline (pH 12.1 ± 0.14/ 11.9 ± 0.25) in comparison to MTA-HP (pH 11.6 ± 0.16/ 11.2 ± 0.10) while ACTIVA was slightly acidic (pH 5.4 ± 0.09/ 6.5 ± 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, it was concluded that calcium silicate- based cements showed a potential antimicrobial activity mainly due to its high alkalinity. The new bioactive resin composite restorative material exhibits less antimicrobial activity due to its resinous ingredients and slightly acidic nature. Antimicrobial effect of calcium silicate cements against strictly anaerobic bacterial species is still questionable. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829974/ /pubmed/31684929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0933-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
ElReash, Ashraf Abou
Hamama, Hamdi
Eldars, Waleed
Lingwei, Gong
Zaen El-Din, Ahmed M.
Xiaoli, Xie
Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
title Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
title_full Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
title_short Antimicrobial activity and pH measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
title_sort antimicrobial activity and ph measurement of calcium silicate cements versus new bioactive resin composite restorative material
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0933-z
work_keys_str_mv AT elreashashrafabou antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial
AT hamamahamdi antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial
AT eldarswaleed antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial
AT lingweigong antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial
AT zaeneldinahmedm antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial
AT xiaolixie antimicrobialactivityandphmeasurementofcalciumsilicatecementsversusnewbioactiveresincompositerestorativematerial