Cargando…
A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods
BACKGROUND: Pathway enrichment extensively used in the analysis of Omics data for gaining biological insights into the functional roles of pre-defined subsets of genes, proteins and metabolites. A large number of methods have been proposed in the literature for this task. The vast majority of these...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3146-1 |
_version_ | 1783465689656328192 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Jing Shojaie, Ali Michailidis, George |
author_facet | Ma, Jing Shojaie, Ali Michailidis, George |
author_sort | Ma, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pathway enrichment extensively used in the analysis of Omics data for gaining biological insights into the functional roles of pre-defined subsets of genes, proteins and metabolites. A large number of methods have been proposed in the literature for this task. The vast majority of these methods use as input expression levels of the biomolecules under study together with their membership in pathways of interest. The latest generation of pathway enrichment methods also leverages information on the topology of the underlying pathways, which as evidence from their evaluation reveals, lead to improved sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, a systematic empirical comparison of such methods is still lacking, making selection of the most suitable method for a specific experimental setting challenging. This comparative study of nine network-based methods for pathway enrichment analysis aims to provide a systematic evaluation of their performance based on three real data sets with different number of features (genes/metabolites) and number of samples. RESULTS: The findings highlight both methodological and empirical differences across the nine methods. In particular, certain methods assess pathway enrichment due to differences both across expression levels and in the strength of the interconnectedness of the members of the pathway, while others only leverage differential expression levels. In the more challenging setting involving a metabolomics data set, the results show that methods that utilize both pieces of information (with NetGSA being a prototypical one) exhibit superior statistical power in detecting pathway enrichment. CONCLUSION: The analysis reveals that a number of methods perform equally well when testing large size pathways, which is the case with genomic data. On the other hand, NetGSA that takes into consideration both differential expression of the biomolecules in the pathway, as well as changes in the topology exhibits a superior performance when testing small size pathways, which is usually the case for metabolomics data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68299992019-11-08 A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods Ma, Jing Shojaie, Ali Michailidis, George BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Pathway enrichment extensively used in the analysis of Omics data for gaining biological insights into the functional roles of pre-defined subsets of genes, proteins and metabolites. A large number of methods have been proposed in the literature for this task. The vast majority of these methods use as input expression levels of the biomolecules under study together with their membership in pathways of interest. The latest generation of pathway enrichment methods also leverages information on the topology of the underlying pathways, which as evidence from their evaluation reveals, lead to improved sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, a systematic empirical comparison of such methods is still lacking, making selection of the most suitable method for a specific experimental setting challenging. This comparative study of nine network-based methods for pathway enrichment analysis aims to provide a systematic evaluation of their performance based on three real data sets with different number of features (genes/metabolites) and number of samples. RESULTS: The findings highlight both methodological and empirical differences across the nine methods. In particular, certain methods assess pathway enrichment due to differences both across expression levels and in the strength of the interconnectedness of the members of the pathway, while others only leverage differential expression levels. In the more challenging setting involving a metabolomics data set, the results show that methods that utilize both pieces of information (with NetGSA being a prototypical one) exhibit superior statistical power in detecting pathway enrichment. CONCLUSION: The analysis reveals that a number of methods perform equally well when testing large size pathways, which is the case with genomic data. On the other hand, NetGSA that takes into consideration both differential expression of the biomolecules in the pathway, as well as changes in the topology exhibits a superior performance when testing small size pathways, which is usually the case for metabolomics data. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829999/ /pubmed/31684881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3146-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ma, Jing Shojaie, Ali Michailidis, George A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
title | A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
title_full | A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
title_short | A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
title_sort | comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3146-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majing acomparativestudyoftopologybasedpathwayenrichmentanalysismethods AT shojaieali acomparativestudyoftopologybasedpathwayenrichmentanalysismethods AT michailidisgeorge acomparativestudyoftopologybasedpathwayenrichmentanalysismethods AT majing comparativestudyoftopologybasedpathwayenrichmentanalysismethods AT shojaieali comparativestudyoftopologybasedpathwayenrichmentanalysismethods AT michailidisgeorge comparativestudyoftopologybasedpathwayenrichmentanalysismethods |