Cargando…

A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of using a modified Malecot catheter with a proximal end adapter as compared to the conventional Malecot catheter, and demonstrate the technique of performing a contrast study without removing the guidewire (GW). Patients and Methods: A modified 14-F Malecot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonawane, Parag, Ganpule, Arvind, B, Sudharsan, Singh, Abhishek, Sabnis, Ravindra, Desai, Mahesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1626587
_version_ 1783465743023603712
author Sonawane, Parag
Ganpule, Arvind
B, Sudharsan
Singh, Abhishek
Sabnis, Ravindra
Desai, Mahesh
author_facet Sonawane, Parag
Ganpule, Arvind
B, Sudharsan
Singh, Abhishek
Sabnis, Ravindra
Desai, Mahesh
author_sort Sonawane, Parag
collection PubMed
description Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of using a modified Malecot catheter with a proximal end adapter as compared to the conventional Malecot catheter, and demonstrate the technique of performing a contrast study without removing the guidewire (GW). Patients and Methods: A modified 14-F Malecot catheter with a new proximal end connector with one side channel was used for percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) under fluoroscopy guidance in five patients. The modified Malecot catheter was introduced over the GW under fluoroscopy guidance. The contrast study was done using the side channel of the connector whilst the GW was in situ through the main channel. Five senior urologists were asked to assess the modified Malecot catheter by rating their experience on a 5-point Likert scale, which had three items. In a further five patients, the same urologists performed PCN using a conventional Malecot catheter and again rated their experience on the same Likert scale. Results: Total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and ease of insertion were comparable in the two groups; however, the ease of the contrast study, security of correct positioning, and overall assessment were reported to be better with the modified Malecot catheter. Conclusion: The modified Malecot design allows for easy percutaneous access comparable to the conventional Malecot catheter, with the advantages of ease of performing a contrast study and better security of correct positioning. Abbreviations: GW: guidewire; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCS: pelvicalyceal system
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68302462019-11-13 A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy Sonawane, Parag Ganpule, Arvind B, Sudharsan Singh, Abhishek Sabnis, Ravindra Desai, Mahesh Arab J Urol Point of Technique Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of using a modified Malecot catheter with a proximal end adapter as compared to the conventional Malecot catheter, and demonstrate the technique of performing a contrast study without removing the guidewire (GW). Patients and Methods: A modified 14-F Malecot catheter with a new proximal end connector with one side channel was used for percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) under fluoroscopy guidance in five patients. The modified Malecot catheter was introduced over the GW under fluoroscopy guidance. The contrast study was done using the side channel of the connector whilst the GW was in situ through the main channel. Five senior urologists were asked to assess the modified Malecot catheter by rating their experience on a 5-point Likert scale, which had three items. In a further five patients, the same urologists performed PCN using a conventional Malecot catheter and again rated their experience on the same Likert scale. Results: Total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and ease of insertion were comparable in the two groups; however, the ease of the contrast study, security of correct positioning, and overall assessment were reported to be better with the modified Malecot catheter. Conclusion: The modified Malecot design allows for easy percutaneous access comparable to the conventional Malecot catheter, with the advantages of ease of performing a contrast study and better security of correct positioning. Abbreviations: GW: guidewire; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCS: pelvicalyceal system Taylor & Francis 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6830246/ /pubmed/31723452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1626587 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Point of Technique
Sonawane, Parag
Ganpule, Arvind
B, Sudharsan
Singh, Abhishek
Sabnis, Ravindra
Desai, Mahesh
A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
title A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
title_full A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
title_fullStr A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
title_full_unstemmed A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
title_short A modified Malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
title_sort modified malecot catheter design to prevent complications during difficult percutaneous nephrostomy
topic Point of Technique
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1626587
work_keys_str_mv AT sonawaneparag amodifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT ganpulearvind amodifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT bsudharsan amodifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT singhabhishek amodifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT sabnisravindra amodifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT desaimahesh amodifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT sonawaneparag modifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT ganpulearvind modifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT bsudharsan modifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT singhabhishek modifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT sabnisravindra modifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT desaimahesh modifiedmalecotcatheterdesigntopreventcomplicationsduringdifficultpercutaneousnephrostomy