Cargando…
A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access
Objective: To develop a new model comprised of a bovine kidney within a chicken carcass for training in percutaneous renal access (PRA) and compare its effectiveness with the traditional mannequin model. Subjects, materials and methods: The study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2017. The con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1642600 |
_version_ | 1783465744258826240 |
---|---|
author | Vijayakumar, Mohankumar Balaji, Sudharsan Singh, Abhishek Ganpule, Arvind Sabnis, Ravindra Desai, Mahesh |
author_facet | Vijayakumar, Mohankumar Balaji, Sudharsan Singh, Abhishek Ganpule, Arvind Sabnis, Ravindra Desai, Mahesh |
author_sort | Vijayakumar, Mohankumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To develop a new model comprised of a bovine kidney within a chicken carcass for training in percutaneous renal access (PRA) and compare its effectiveness with the traditional mannequin model. Subjects, materials and methods: The study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2017. The content and the construct validity of the new model were confirmed after which it was compared with the traditional non-biological model for PRA. In all, 20 urology residents, with experience of <20 cases, were enrolled in the study. The parameters assessed were time to puncture, attempts to successful puncture, and fluoroscopy exposure time. They were also asked to complete a subjective assessment questionnaire. Results: The new ex vivo biological model had both content and construct validity. On comparison with the non-biological model, there was no statistically significant difference between the two models for time to puncture, total fluoroscopy exposure, and also the number of attempts taken for a successful puncture. The participants felt that the new biological model was better than the non-biological model in terms of overall assessment, tissue feel, and confidence in training. But the non-biological model scored better than the new biological model for ease of puncture and model preparation. Conclusion: The present model is inexpensive and easy to construct, and has both content and construct validity. It is a feasible model for fluoroscopy-guided PRA. Abbreviations: 3D: three-dimensional; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; PRA: percutaneous renal access; VR: virtual reality |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6830254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68302542019-11-13 A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access Vijayakumar, Mohankumar Balaji, Sudharsan Singh, Abhishek Ganpule, Arvind Sabnis, Ravindra Desai, Mahesh Arab J Urol Stones/Endourology Objective: To develop a new model comprised of a bovine kidney within a chicken carcass for training in percutaneous renal access (PRA) and compare its effectiveness with the traditional mannequin model. Subjects, materials and methods: The study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2017. The content and the construct validity of the new model were confirmed after which it was compared with the traditional non-biological model for PRA. In all, 20 urology residents, with experience of <20 cases, were enrolled in the study. The parameters assessed were time to puncture, attempts to successful puncture, and fluoroscopy exposure time. They were also asked to complete a subjective assessment questionnaire. Results: The new ex vivo biological model had both content and construct validity. On comparison with the non-biological model, there was no statistically significant difference between the two models for time to puncture, total fluoroscopy exposure, and also the number of attempts taken for a successful puncture. The participants felt that the new biological model was better than the non-biological model in terms of overall assessment, tissue feel, and confidence in training. But the non-biological model scored better than the new biological model for ease of puncture and model preparation. Conclusion: The present model is inexpensive and easy to construct, and has both content and construct validity. It is a feasible model for fluoroscopy-guided PRA. Abbreviations: 3D: three-dimensional; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; PRA: percutaneous renal access; VR: virtual reality Taylor & Francis 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6830254/ /pubmed/31723446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1642600 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Stones/Endourology Vijayakumar, Mohankumar Balaji, Sudharsan Singh, Abhishek Ganpule, Arvind Sabnis, Ravindra Desai, Mahesh A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
title | A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
title_full | A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
title_fullStr | A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
title_short | A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
title_sort | novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access |
topic | Stones/Endourology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1642600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vijayakumarmohankumar anovelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT balajisudharsan anovelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT singhabhishek anovelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT ganpulearvind anovelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT sabnisravindra anovelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT desaimahesh anovelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT vijayakumarmohankumar novelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT balajisudharsan novelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT singhabhishek novelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT ganpulearvind novelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT sabnisravindra novelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess AT desaimahesh novelbiologicalmodelfortraininginpercutaneousrenalaccess |