Cargando…

Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study

Objective: Impulse control disorders and related behaviors (ICDs) are common in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), yet incidence and predictive factors are not fully understood. We examined the epidemiology of ICDs in PD through secondary and post-hoc analyses of data from the ICARUS (SP0990) s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barone, Paolo, Antonini, Angelo, Stanzione, Paolo, Annoni, Karin, Asgharnejad, Mahnaz, Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31700703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1675670
_version_ 1783465747675086848
author Barone, Paolo
Antonini, Angelo
Stanzione, Paolo
Annoni, Karin
Asgharnejad, Mahnaz
Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
author_facet Barone, Paolo
Antonini, Angelo
Stanzione, Paolo
Annoni, Karin
Asgharnejad, Mahnaz
Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
author_sort Barone, Paolo
collection PubMed
description Objective: Impulse control disorders and related behaviors (ICDs) are common in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), yet incidence and predictive factors are not fully understood. We examined the epidemiology of ICDs in PD through secondary and post-hoc analyses of data from the ICARUS (SP0990) study, which enrolled >1000 patients. Methods: Using a modified-Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview (mMIDI), ICD incidence was calculated for patients who were ICD-negative at baseline but ICD-positive at year 1, and year 1 and/or 2 (cumulative 2-year ICD incidence). The proportion of “new cases” (ICD-negative at baseline, but ICD-positive at year 1 or 2), and “remitters” (ICD-positive at baseline but ICD-negative at year 1 or 2) was also calculated for the whole ICARUS population. Results: Among 709 patients ICD-negative at baseline, 97 screened ICD-positive (13.7%) at year 1. Among 712 patients who were ICD-negative at baseline, 147 were ICD-positive at ≥1 post-baseline visit (20.6%). Among patients who were ICD-negative at baseline who subsequently experienced an ICD, a higher proportion were male or smokers, younger at baseline, younger at disease/symptom onset, and had longer disease duration. Among the whole population, a similar proportion were “new cases” at years 1 (9.7%) and 2 (8.6%) versus the previous visit. The proportion of “remitters” was slightly higher at year 2 (11.0%) than 1 (9.1%) versus previous visit. Conclusions: The proportion of ICD-remitters approximately matched/exceeded new cases, suggesting patients with ICD are in a state of flux. Current data allow for a conservative estimate of 2-year ICD incidence in ICARUS of ∼21% of patients, not accounting for transient new ICD cases between visits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68302722019-11-07 Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study Barone, Paolo Antonini, Angelo Stanzione, Paolo Annoni, Karin Asgharnejad, Mahnaz Bonuccelli, Ubaldo J Drug Assess Neurology Objective: Impulse control disorders and related behaviors (ICDs) are common in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), yet incidence and predictive factors are not fully understood. We examined the epidemiology of ICDs in PD through secondary and post-hoc analyses of data from the ICARUS (SP0990) study, which enrolled >1000 patients. Methods: Using a modified-Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview (mMIDI), ICD incidence was calculated for patients who were ICD-negative at baseline but ICD-positive at year 1, and year 1 and/or 2 (cumulative 2-year ICD incidence). The proportion of “new cases” (ICD-negative at baseline, but ICD-positive at year 1 or 2), and “remitters” (ICD-positive at baseline but ICD-negative at year 1 or 2) was also calculated for the whole ICARUS population. Results: Among 709 patients ICD-negative at baseline, 97 screened ICD-positive (13.7%) at year 1. Among 712 patients who were ICD-negative at baseline, 147 were ICD-positive at ≥1 post-baseline visit (20.6%). Among patients who were ICD-negative at baseline who subsequently experienced an ICD, a higher proportion were male or smokers, younger at baseline, younger at disease/symptom onset, and had longer disease duration. Among the whole population, a similar proportion were “new cases” at years 1 (9.7%) and 2 (8.6%) versus the previous visit. The proportion of “remitters” was slightly higher at year 2 (11.0%) than 1 (9.1%) versus previous visit. Conclusions: The proportion of ICD-remitters approximately matched/exceeded new cases, suggesting patients with ICD are in a state of flux. Current data allow for a conservative estimate of 2-year ICD incidence in ICARUS of ∼21% of patients, not accounting for transient new ICD cases between visits. Taylor & Francis 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6830272/ /pubmed/31700703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1675670 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Barone, Paolo
Antonini, Angelo
Stanzione, Paolo
Annoni, Karin
Asgharnejad, Mahnaz
Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study
title Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study
title_full Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study
title_fullStr Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study
title_short Risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the ICARUS study
title_sort risk factors for impulse control disorders and related behaviors in parkinson’s disease: secondary analyses of the icarus study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31700703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1675670
work_keys_str_mv AT baronepaolo riskfactorsforimpulsecontroldisordersandrelatedbehaviorsinparkinsonsdiseasesecondaryanalysesoftheicarusstudy
AT antoniniangelo riskfactorsforimpulsecontroldisordersandrelatedbehaviorsinparkinsonsdiseasesecondaryanalysesoftheicarusstudy
AT stanzionepaolo riskfactorsforimpulsecontroldisordersandrelatedbehaviorsinparkinsonsdiseasesecondaryanalysesoftheicarusstudy
AT annonikarin riskfactorsforimpulsecontroldisordersandrelatedbehaviorsinparkinsonsdiseasesecondaryanalysesoftheicarusstudy
AT asgharnejadmahnaz riskfactorsforimpulsecontroldisordersandrelatedbehaviorsinparkinsonsdiseasesecondaryanalysesoftheicarusstudy
AT bonuccelliubaldo riskfactorsforimpulsecontroldisordersandrelatedbehaviorsinparkinsonsdiseasesecondaryanalysesoftheicarusstudy