Cargando…

Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis

Objective: To compare two retrieval incisions, Pfannenstiel vs iliac fossa incision, in terms of operative technique-related variables and variables related to patient satisfaction postoperatively, in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Patients and methods: This prospective ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshmukh, Chaitanya S., Ganpule, Arvind P., Sudharsan, S. Balaji, Singh, Abhishek G., Sabnis, Ravindra B., Desai, Mahesh R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1637069
_version_ 1783465751894556672
author Deshmukh, Chaitanya S.
Ganpule, Arvind P.
Sudharsan, S. Balaji
Singh, Abhishek G.
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
author_facet Deshmukh, Chaitanya S.
Ganpule, Arvind P.
Sudharsan, S. Balaji
Singh, Abhishek G.
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
author_sort Deshmukh, Chaitanya S.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare two retrieval incisions, Pfannenstiel vs iliac fossa incision, in terms of operative technique-related variables and variables related to patient satisfaction postoperatively, in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Patients and methods: This prospective randomised study was conducted between May 2016 and April 2017. All the voluntary kidney donors aged 18–60 years were randomised into two groups. Group 1, comprised patients undergoing graft retrieval via an iliac fossa incision, and Group 2 comprised those undergoing graft retrieval via a Pfannenstiel incision. Intraoperative assessment of the incision by the surgeon was done using a Likert scale-based questionnaire. Other variables studied were the operative time, retrieval time, warm ischaemia time, and length of incision. Postoperatively, visual analogue scale pain scores, analgesia consumption, and hospital stay were compared. During follow-up cosmetic outcome was compared. Results: In all, 108 patients were enrolled in the study with 54 patients in each group. The mean operative time was shorter in Pfannenstiel-incision group, at 155.2 vs 171.67 min (P = 0.01). The retrieval incision length was significantly less in the Pfannenstiel arm, at 9.29 vs 9.85 cm (P < 0.001). In the surgeon Likert scale-based questionnaire, the Pfannenstiel incision scored better than the iliac fossa incision for ease of specimen retrieval (P = 0.015), ease of immediate check laparoscopy (P = 0.002), and ease of incision closure (P < 0.001). The Pfannenstiel-incision group required less postoperative analgesia, at a mean (SD) of 7.03 (8.82) vs 15.55 (11.1) mg nalbuphine (P < 0.001). During follow-up the Manchester Scar Scores were lesser in the Pfannenstiel-incision group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Pfannenstiel incision was considered preferable during the critical steps of the LDN and had a smaller retrieval incision, lesser operative time and postoperative analgesia requirement, and better cosmesis than the iliac fossa incision. Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; LDN: laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; VAS: visual analogue scale; WIT, warm ischaemia time
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68302942019-11-13 Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis Deshmukh, Chaitanya S. Ganpule, Arvind P. Sudharsan, S. Balaji Singh, Abhishek G. Sabnis, Ravindra B. Desai, Mahesh R. Arab J Urol Laparoscopy/Robotics Objective: To compare two retrieval incisions, Pfannenstiel vs iliac fossa incision, in terms of operative technique-related variables and variables related to patient satisfaction postoperatively, in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Patients and methods: This prospective randomised study was conducted between May 2016 and April 2017. All the voluntary kidney donors aged 18–60 years were randomised into two groups. Group 1, comprised patients undergoing graft retrieval via an iliac fossa incision, and Group 2 comprised those undergoing graft retrieval via a Pfannenstiel incision. Intraoperative assessment of the incision by the surgeon was done using a Likert scale-based questionnaire. Other variables studied were the operative time, retrieval time, warm ischaemia time, and length of incision. Postoperatively, visual analogue scale pain scores, analgesia consumption, and hospital stay were compared. During follow-up cosmetic outcome was compared. Results: In all, 108 patients were enrolled in the study with 54 patients in each group. The mean operative time was shorter in Pfannenstiel-incision group, at 155.2 vs 171.67 min (P = 0.01). The retrieval incision length was significantly less in the Pfannenstiel arm, at 9.29 vs 9.85 cm (P < 0.001). In the surgeon Likert scale-based questionnaire, the Pfannenstiel incision scored better than the iliac fossa incision for ease of specimen retrieval (P = 0.015), ease of immediate check laparoscopy (P = 0.002), and ease of incision closure (P < 0.001). The Pfannenstiel-incision group required less postoperative analgesia, at a mean (SD) of 7.03 (8.82) vs 15.55 (11.1) mg nalbuphine (P < 0.001). During follow-up the Manchester Scar Scores were lesser in the Pfannenstiel-incision group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Pfannenstiel incision was considered preferable during the critical steps of the LDN and had a smaller retrieval incision, lesser operative time and postoperative analgesia requirement, and better cosmesis than the iliac fossa incision. Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; LDN: laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; VAS: visual analogue scale; WIT, warm ischaemia time Taylor & Francis 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6830294/ /pubmed/31723450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1637069 Text en © 2019 Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Laparoscopy/Robotics
Deshmukh, Chaitanya S.
Ganpule, Arvind P.
Sudharsan, S. Balaji
Singh, Abhishek G.
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis
title Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis
title_full Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis
title_fullStr Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis
title_short Iliac fossa vs Pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A critical analysis
title_sort iliac fossa vs pfannenstiel retrieval incision in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a critical analysis
topic Laparoscopy/Robotics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1637069
work_keys_str_mv AT deshmukhchaitanyas iliacfossavspfannenstielretrievalincisioninlaparoscopicdonornephrectomyacriticalanalysis
AT ganpulearvindp iliacfossavspfannenstielretrievalincisioninlaparoscopicdonornephrectomyacriticalanalysis
AT sudharsansbalaji iliacfossavspfannenstielretrievalincisioninlaparoscopicdonornephrectomyacriticalanalysis
AT singhabhishekg iliacfossavspfannenstielretrievalincisioninlaparoscopicdonornephrectomyacriticalanalysis
AT sabnisravindrab iliacfossavspfannenstielretrievalincisioninlaparoscopicdonornephrectomyacriticalanalysis
AT desaimaheshr iliacfossavspfannenstielretrievalincisioninlaparoscopicdonornephrectomyacriticalanalysis