Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Leanna S, Tsai, Ming-Chang, Brooks, Dina, Oh, Paul I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589
_version_ 1783465779751026688
author Lee, Leanna S
Tsai, Ming-Chang
Brooks, Dina
Oh, Paul I
author_facet Lee, Leanna S
Tsai, Ming-Chang
Brooks, Dina
Oh, Paul I
author_sort Lee, Leanna S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. Secondary objectives included comparing the effects of AIT versus MICE on cognition, cardiovascular risk profile, adherence and quality of life before and after the 24-week CR programme. METHODS: Thirty-one postmenopausal women with CAD (left ventricular ejection fraction >35%; 68.2±9.2 years of age; V̇O2peak: 19.1±3.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) were randomised to 24 weeks of usual care MICE (60%–80% of V̇O2peak, five times per week) or AIT (four 4-min intervals at 90%–95% of peak heart rate, three times per week+two times per week usual care MICE). Differences between and within groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests and paired samples t-tests, respectively. Treatment effect analysis of AIT on V̇O2peak and secondary outcomes was determined using analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates. RESULTS: A randomised controlled trial study design was unfeasible in this female CAD population. Unanticipated challenges in recruitment availability and eligibility, in combination with a 59% and 50% attrition rate in the AIT and MICE group, respectively, rendered this study underpowered to detect differences between groups. The per protocol treatment effect analysis, however, unveiled a 0.95 mL kg(-1) min(-1) improvement in V̇O2peak in response to AIT over MICE (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to elucidate the patient profile and circumstances under which the potential for the implementation of AIT may be individualised, and offered in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02966158.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68304572019-11-20 Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study Lee, Leanna S Tsai, Ming-Chang Brooks, Dina Oh, Paul I BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. Secondary objectives included comparing the effects of AIT versus MICE on cognition, cardiovascular risk profile, adherence and quality of life before and after the 24-week CR programme. METHODS: Thirty-one postmenopausal women with CAD (left ventricular ejection fraction >35%; 68.2±9.2 years of age; V̇O2peak: 19.1±3.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) were randomised to 24 weeks of usual care MICE (60%–80% of V̇O2peak, five times per week) or AIT (four 4-min intervals at 90%–95% of peak heart rate, three times per week+two times per week usual care MICE). Differences between and within groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests and paired samples t-tests, respectively. Treatment effect analysis of AIT on V̇O2peak and secondary outcomes was determined using analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates. RESULTS: A randomised controlled trial study design was unfeasible in this female CAD population. Unanticipated challenges in recruitment availability and eligibility, in combination with a 59% and 50% attrition rate in the AIT and MICE group, respectively, rendered this study underpowered to detect differences between groups. The per protocol treatment effect analysis, however, unveiled a 0.95 mL kg(-1) min(-1) improvement in V̇O2peak in response to AIT over MICE (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to elucidate the patient profile and circumstances under which the potential for the implementation of AIT may be individualised, and offered in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02966158. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6830457/ /pubmed/31749981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Leanna S
Tsai, Ming-Chang
Brooks, Dina
Oh, Paul I
Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
title Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
title_full Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
title_short Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
title_sort randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: cat versus mice study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589
work_keys_str_mv AT leeleannas randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy
AT tsaimingchang randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy
AT brooksdina randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy
AT ohpauli randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy