Cargando…
Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study
BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589 |
_version_ | 1783465779751026688 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Leanna S Tsai, Ming-Chang Brooks, Dina Oh, Paul I |
author_facet | Lee, Leanna S Tsai, Ming-Chang Brooks, Dina Oh, Paul I |
author_sort | Lee, Leanna S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. Secondary objectives included comparing the effects of AIT versus MICE on cognition, cardiovascular risk profile, adherence and quality of life before and after the 24-week CR programme. METHODS: Thirty-one postmenopausal women with CAD (left ventricular ejection fraction >35%; 68.2±9.2 years of age; V̇O2peak: 19.1±3.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) were randomised to 24 weeks of usual care MICE (60%–80% of V̇O2peak, five times per week) or AIT (four 4-min intervals at 90%–95% of peak heart rate, three times per week+two times per week usual care MICE). Differences between and within groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests and paired samples t-tests, respectively. Treatment effect analysis of AIT on V̇O2peak and secondary outcomes was determined using analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates. RESULTS: A randomised controlled trial study design was unfeasible in this female CAD population. Unanticipated challenges in recruitment availability and eligibility, in combination with a 59% and 50% attrition rate in the AIT and MICE group, respectively, rendered this study underpowered to detect differences between groups. The per protocol treatment effect analysis, however, unveiled a 0.95 mL kg(-1) min(-1) improvement in V̇O2peak in response to AIT over MICE (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to elucidate the patient profile and circumstances under which the potential for the implementation of AIT may be individualised, and offered in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02966158. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6830457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68304572019-11-20 Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study Lee, Leanna S Tsai, Ming-Chang Brooks, Dina Oh, Paul I BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. Secondary objectives included comparing the effects of AIT versus MICE on cognition, cardiovascular risk profile, adherence and quality of life before and after the 24-week CR programme. METHODS: Thirty-one postmenopausal women with CAD (left ventricular ejection fraction >35%; 68.2±9.2 years of age; V̇O2peak: 19.1±3.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) were randomised to 24 weeks of usual care MICE (60%–80% of V̇O2peak, five times per week) or AIT (four 4-min intervals at 90%–95% of peak heart rate, three times per week+two times per week usual care MICE). Differences between and within groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests and paired samples t-tests, respectively. Treatment effect analysis of AIT on V̇O2peak and secondary outcomes was determined using analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates. RESULTS: A randomised controlled trial study design was unfeasible in this female CAD population. Unanticipated challenges in recruitment availability and eligibility, in combination with a 59% and 50% attrition rate in the AIT and MICE group, respectively, rendered this study underpowered to detect differences between groups. The per protocol treatment effect analysis, however, unveiled a 0.95 mL kg(-1) min(-1) improvement in V̇O2peak in response to AIT over MICE (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to elucidate the patient profile and circumstances under which the potential for the implementation of AIT may be individualised, and offered in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02966158. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6830457/ /pubmed/31749981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Leanna S Tsai, Ming-Chang Brooks, Dina Oh, Paul I Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study |
title | Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study |
title_full | Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study |
title_short | Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: cat versus mice study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeleannas randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy AT tsaimingchang randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy AT brooksdina randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy AT ohpauli randomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithcoronaryarterydiseaseinvestigatingtheeffectsofaerobicintervaltrainingversusmoderateintensitycontinuousexerciseincardiacrehabilitationcatversusmicestudy |