Cargando…
Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to assess the uptake, sustainability and influence of the Footprints Project. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed university-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients admitted and their families, as well as clinicians. INTERVENTION...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31678940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810 |
_version_ | 1783465798432456704 |
---|---|
author | Hoad, Neala Swinton, Marilyn Takaoka, Alyson Tam, Benjamin Shears, Melissa Waugh, Lily Toledo, Feli Clarke, France J Duan, Erick Huaileigh Soth, Mark Cook, Deborah J |
author_facet | Hoad, Neala Swinton, Marilyn Takaoka, Alyson Tam, Benjamin Shears, Melissa Waugh, Lily Toledo, Feli Clarke, France J Duan, Erick Huaileigh Soth, Mark Cook, Deborah J |
author_sort | Hoad, Neala |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to assess the uptake, sustainability and influence of the Footprints Project. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed university-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients admitted and their families, as well as clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a personalised patient Footprints Form and Whiteboard to facilitate holistic, patient-centred care, to inform clinical encounters, and to create deeper connections among patients, families and clinicians. OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted 3 audits to examine uptake and sustainability. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 clinicians, and held 5 focus groups with 25 clinicians; and we interviewed 5 patients and 13 family representatives of 5 patients who survived and 5 who died in the ICU. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The Footprints Project facilitated holistic, patient-centred care by setting the stage for patient and family experience, motivating the patient and humanising the patient for clinicians. Through informing clinical encounters, Footprints helped clinicians initiate more personal conversations, foster deeper connections and guide treatment. Professional practice influences included more focused attention on the patient, enhanced interdisciplinary communication and changes in community culture. Initially used in 15.8% of patients (audit A), uptake increased to 51.4% in audit B, and was sustained at 57.8% in audit C. CONCLUSIONS: By sharing valuable personal information about patients before and beyond their illness on individualised whiteboards at each bedside, the Footprints Project fosters humanism in critical care practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6830601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68306012019-11-20 Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care Hoad, Neala Swinton, Marilyn Takaoka, Alyson Tam, Benjamin Shears, Melissa Waugh, Lily Toledo, Feli Clarke, France J Duan, Erick Huaileigh Soth, Mark Cook, Deborah J BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to assess the uptake, sustainability and influence of the Footprints Project. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed university-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients admitted and their families, as well as clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a personalised patient Footprints Form and Whiteboard to facilitate holistic, patient-centred care, to inform clinical encounters, and to create deeper connections among patients, families and clinicians. OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted 3 audits to examine uptake and sustainability. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 clinicians, and held 5 focus groups with 25 clinicians; and we interviewed 5 patients and 13 family representatives of 5 patients who survived and 5 who died in the ICU. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The Footprints Project facilitated holistic, patient-centred care by setting the stage for patient and family experience, motivating the patient and humanising the patient for clinicians. Through informing clinical encounters, Footprints helped clinicians initiate more personal conversations, foster deeper connections and guide treatment. Professional practice influences included more focused attention on the patient, enhanced interdisciplinary communication and changes in community culture. Initially used in 15.8% of patients (audit A), uptake increased to 51.4% in audit B, and was sustained at 57.8% in audit C. CONCLUSIONS: By sharing valuable personal information about patients before and beyond their illness on individualised whiteboards at each bedside, the Footprints Project fosters humanism in critical care practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6830601/ /pubmed/31678940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Hoad, Neala Swinton, Marilyn Takaoka, Alyson Tam, Benjamin Shears, Melissa Waugh, Lily Toledo, Feli Clarke, France J Duan, Erick Huaileigh Soth, Mark Cook, Deborah J Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care |
title | Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care |
title_full | Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care |
title_fullStr | Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care |
title_full_unstemmed | Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care |
title_short | Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care |
title_sort | fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the footprints project in critical care |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31678940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoadneala fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT swintonmarilyn fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT takaokaalyson fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT tambenjamin fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT shearsmelissa fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT waughlily fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT toledofeli fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT clarkefrancej fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT duanerickhuaileigh fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT sothmark fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare AT cookdeborahj fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare |