Cargando…

Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to assess the uptake, sustainability and influence of the Footprints Project. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed university-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients admitted and their families, as well as clinicians. INTERVENTION...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoad, Neala, Swinton, Marilyn, Takaoka, Alyson, Tam, Benjamin, Shears, Melissa, Waugh, Lily, Toledo, Feli, Clarke, France J, Duan, Erick Huaileigh, Soth, Mark, Cook, Deborah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31678940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810
_version_ 1783465798432456704
author Hoad, Neala
Swinton, Marilyn
Takaoka, Alyson
Tam, Benjamin
Shears, Melissa
Waugh, Lily
Toledo, Feli
Clarke, France J
Duan, Erick Huaileigh
Soth, Mark
Cook, Deborah J
author_facet Hoad, Neala
Swinton, Marilyn
Takaoka, Alyson
Tam, Benjamin
Shears, Melissa
Waugh, Lily
Toledo, Feli
Clarke, France J
Duan, Erick Huaileigh
Soth, Mark
Cook, Deborah J
author_sort Hoad, Neala
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to assess the uptake, sustainability and influence of the Footprints Project. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed university-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients admitted and their families, as well as clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a personalised patient Footprints Form and Whiteboard to facilitate holistic, patient-centred care, to inform clinical encounters, and to create deeper connections among patients, families and clinicians. OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted 3 audits to examine uptake and sustainability. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 clinicians, and held 5 focus groups with 25 clinicians; and we interviewed 5 patients and 13 family representatives of 5 patients who survived and 5 who died in the ICU. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The Footprints Project facilitated holistic, patient-centred care by setting the stage for patient and family experience, motivating the patient and humanising the patient for clinicians. Through informing clinical encounters, Footprints helped clinicians initiate more personal conversations, foster deeper connections and guide treatment. Professional practice influences included more focused attention on the patient, enhanced interdisciplinary communication and changes in community culture. Initially used in 15.8% of patients (audit A), uptake increased to 51.4% in audit B, and was sustained at 57.8% in audit C. CONCLUSIONS: By sharing valuable personal information about patients before and beyond their illness on individualised whiteboards at each bedside, the Footprints Project fosters humanism in critical care practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68306012019-11-20 Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care Hoad, Neala Swinton, Marilyn Takaoka, Alyson Tam, Benjamin Shears, Melissa Waugh, Lily Toledo, Feli Clarke, France J Duan, Erick Huaileigh Soth, Mark Cook, Deborah J BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to assess the uptake, sustainability and influence of the Footprints Project. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed university-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU patients admitted and their families, as well as clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a personalised patient Footprints Form and Whiteboard to facilitate holistic, patient-centred care, to inform clinical encounters, and to create deeper connections among patients, families and clinicians. OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted 3 audits to examine uptake and sustainability. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 clinicians, and held 5 focus groups with 25 clinicians; and we interviewed 5 patients and 13 family representatives of 5 patients who survived and 5 who died in the ICU. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The Footprints Project facilitated holistic, patient-centred care by setting the stage for patient and family experience, motivating the patient and humanising the patient for clinicians. Through informing clinical encounters, Footprints helped clinicians initiate more personal conversations, foster deeper connections and guide treatment. Professional practice influences included more focused attention on the patient, enhanced interdisciplinary communication and changes in community culture. Initially used in 15.8% of patients (audit A), uptake increased to 51.4% in audit B, and was sustained at 57.8% in audit C. CONCLUSIONS: By sharing valuable personal information about patients before and beyond their illness on individualised whiteboards at each bedside, the Footprints Project fosters humanism in critical care practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6830601/ /pubmed/31678940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Hoad, Neala
Swinton, Marilyn
Takaoka, Alyson
Tam, Benjamin
Shears, Melissa
Waugh, Lily
Toledo, Feli
Clarke, France J
Duan, Erick Huaileigh
Soth, Mark
Cook, Deborah J
Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
title Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
title_full Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
title_fullStr Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
title_full_unstemmed Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
title_short Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
title_sort fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the footprints project in critical care
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31678940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810
work_keys_str_mv AT hoadneala fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT swintonmarilyn fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT takaokaalyson fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT tambenjamin fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT shearsmelissa fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT waughlily fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT toledofeli fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT clarkefrancej fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT duanerickhuaileigh fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT sothmark fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare
AT cookdeborahj fosteringhumanismamixedmethodsevaluationofthefootprintsprojectincriticalcare