Cargando…

Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVE: To assess Chilean medical and midwifery students’ attitudes and willingness to become trained to provide abortion care, shortly after abortion was decriminalised in 2017. DESIGN: We fielded a cross-sectional, web-based survey of medical and midwifery students. We used generalised estimati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggs, M Antonia, Casas, Lidia, Ramm, Alejandra, Baba, C Finley, Correa, Sara Victoria, Grossman, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030797
_version_ 1783465801858154496
author Biggs, M Antonia
Casas, Lidia
Ramm, Alejandra
Baba, C Finley
Correa, Sara Victoria
Grossman, Daniel
author_facet Biggs, M Antonia
Casas, Lidia
Ramm, Alejandra
Baba, C Finley
Correa, Sara Victoria
Grossman, Daniel
author_sort Biggs, M Antonia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess Chilean medical and midwifery students’ attitudes and willingness to become trained to provide abortion care, shortly after abortion was decriminalised in 2017. DESIGN: We fielded a cross-sectional, web-based survey of medical and midwifery students. We used generalised estimating equations to assess differences by type of university and degree sought. SETTING: We recruited students from a combination of seven secular, religiously-affiliated, public and private universities that offer midwifery or medical degrees with a specialisation in obstetrics and gynaecology, located in Santiago, Chile. PARTICIPANTS: Students seeking medical or midwifery degrees at one of seven universities were eligible to participate. We distributed the survey link to medical and midwifery students at these seven universities; 459 eligible students opened the survey link and 377 students completed the survey. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Intentions to become trained to provide abortion services was our primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes included moral views and concerns about abortion provision. RESULTS: Most students intend to become trained to provide abortion services (69%), 20% reported that they will not provide an abortion under any circumstance, half (50%) had one or more concern about abortion provision and 16% agreed/strongly agreed that providing abortions is morally wrong. Most believed that their university should train medical and midwifery students to provide abortion services (70%–79%). Secular university students reported higher intentions to provide abortion services (beta 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.63), more favourable views (beta 0.52, CI: 0.32 to 0.72) and were less likley to report concerns about abortion provision (adjusted OR 0.47, CI: 0.23 to 0.95) than students from religious universities. CONCLUSION: Medical and midwifery students are interested in becoming trained to provide abortion services and believe their university should provide this training. Integrating high-quality training in abortion care into medical and midwifery programmes will be critical to ensuring that women receive timely, non-judgemental and quality abortion care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68306152019-11-20 Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey Biggs, M Antonia Casas, Lidia Ramm, Alejandra Baba, C Finley Correa, Sara Victoria Grossman, Daniel BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To assess Chilean medical and midwifery students’ attitudes and willingness to become trained to provide abortion care, shortly after abortion was decriminalised in 2017. DESIGN: We fielded a cross-sectional, web-based survey of medical and midwifery students. We used generalised estimating equations to assess differences by type of university and degree sought. SETTING: We recruited students from a combination of seven secular, religiously-affiliated, public and private universities that offer midwifery or medical degrees with a specialisation in obstetrics and gynaecology, located in Santiago, Chile. PARTICIPANTS: Students seeking medical or midwifery degrees at one of seven universities were eligible to participate. We distributed the survey link to medical and midwifery students at these seven universities; 459 eligible students opened the survey link and 377 students completed the survey. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Intentions to become trained to provide abortion services was our primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes included moral views and concerns about abortion provision. RESULTS: Most students intend to become trained to provide abortion services (69%), 20% reported that they will not provide an abortion under any circumstance, half (50%) had one or more concern about abortion provision and 16% agreed/strongly agreed that providing abortions is morally wrong. Most believed that their university should train medical and midwifery students to provide abortion services (70%–79%). Secular university students reported higher intentions to provide abortion services (beta 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.63), more favourable views (beta 0.52, CI: 0.32 to 0.72) and were less likley to report concerns about abortion provision (adjusted OR 0.47, CI: 0.23 to 0.95) than students from religious universities. CONCLUSION: Medical and midwifery students are interested in becoming trained to provide abortion services and believe their university should provide this training. Integrating high-quality training in abortion care into medical and midwifery programmes will be critical to ensuring that women receive timely, non-judgemental and quality abortion care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6830615/ /pubmed/31666266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030797 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Biggs, M Antonia
Casas, Lidia
Ramm, Alejandra
Baba, C Finley
Correa, Sara Victoria
Grossman, Daniel
Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
title Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort future health providers’ willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in chile: a cross-sectional survey
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030797
work_keys_str_mv AT biggsmantonia futurehealthproviderswillingnesstoprovideabortionservicesfollowingdecriminalisationofabortioninchileacrosssectionalsurvey
AT casaslidia futurehealthproviderswillingnesstoprovideabortionservicesfollowingdecriminalisationofabortioninchileacrosssectionalsurvey
AT rammalejandra futurehealthproviderswillingnesstoprovideabortionservicesfollowingdecriminalisationofabortioninchileacrosssectionalsurvey
AT babacfinley futurehealthproviderswillingnesstoprovideabortionservicesfollowingdecriminalisationofabortioninchileacrosssectionalsurvey
AT correasaravictoria futurehealthproviderswillingnesstoprovideabortionservicesfollowingdecriminalisationofabortioninchileacrosssectionalsurvey
AT grossmandaniel futurehealthproviderswillingnesstoprovideabortionservicesfollowingdecriminalisationofabortioninchileacrosssectionalsurvey