Cargando…

Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal and maternal outcomes for Australian women with uncomplicated pregnancies according to planned place of birth, that is, in hospital labour wards, birth centres or at home. DESIGN: A population-based retrospective design, linking and analysing routinely collected elect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Homer, Caroline S E, Cheah, Seong L, Rossiter, Chris, Dahlen, Hannah G, Ellwood, David, Foureur, Maralyn J, Forster, Della A, McLachlan, Helen L, Oats, Jeremy J N, Sibbritt, David, Thornton, Charlene, Scarf, Vanessa L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029192
_version_ 1783465816538218496
author Homer, Caroline S E
Cheah, Seong L
Rossiter, Chris
Dahlen, Hannah G
Ellwood, David
Foureur, Maralyn J
Forster, Della A
McLachlan, Helen L
Oats, Jeremy J N
Sibbritt, David
Thornton, Charlene
Scarf, Vanessa L
author_facet Homer, Caroline S E
Cheah, Seong L
Rossiter, Chris
Dahlen, Hannah G
Ellwood, David
Foureur, Maralyn J
Forster, Della A
McLachlan, Helen L
Oats, Jeremy J N
Sibbritt, David
Thornton, Charlene
Scarf, Vanessa L
author_sort Homer, Caroline S E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal and maternal outcomes for Australian women with uncomplicated pregnancies according to planned place of birth, that is, in hospital labour wards, birth centres or at home. DESIGN: A population-based retrospective design, linking and analysing routinely collected electronic data. Analysis comprised χ(2) tests and binary logistic regression for categorical data, yielding adjusted ORs. Continuous data were analysed using analysis of variance. SETTING: All eight Australian states and territories. PARTICIPANTS: Women with uncomplicated pregnancies who gave birth between 2000 and 2012 to a singleton baby in cephalic presentation at between 37 and 41 completed weeks’ gestation. Of the 1 251 420 births, 1 171 703 (93.6%) were planned in hospital labour wards, 71 505 (5.7%) in birth centres and 8212 (0.7%) at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of birth, normal labour and birth, interventions and procedures during labour and birth, maternal complications, admission to special care/high dependency or intensive care units (mother or infant) and perinatal mortality (intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death). RESULTS: Compared with planned hospital births, the odds of normal labour and birth were over twice as high in planned birth centre births (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.72; 99% CI 2.63 to 2.81) and nearly six times as high in planned home births (AOR 5.91; 99% CI 5.15 to 6.78). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of intrapartum stillbirths, early or late neonatal deaths between the three planned places of birth. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Australia-wide study to examine outcomes by planned place of birth. For healthy women in Australia having an uncomplicated pregnancy, planned births in birth centres or at home are associated with positive maternal outcomes although the number of homebirths was small overall. There were no significant differences in the perinatal mortality rate, although the absolute numbers of deaths were very small and therefore firm conclusions cannot be drawn about perinatal mortality outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68306732019-11-20 Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study Homer, Caroline S E Cheah, Seong L Rossiter, Chris Dahlen, Hannah G Ellwood, David Foureur, Maralyn J Forster, Della A McLachlan, Helen L Oats, Jeremy J N Sibbritt, David Thornton, Charlene Scarf, Vanessa L BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal and maternal outcomes for Australian women with uncomplicated pregnancies according to planned place of birth, that is, in hospital labour wards, birth centres or at home. DESIGN: A population-based retrospective design, linking and analysing routinely collected electronic data. Analysis comprised χ(2) tests and binary logistic regression for categorical data, yielding adjusted ORs. Continuous data were analysed using analysis of variance. SETTING: All eight Australian states and territories. PARTICIPANTS: Women with uncomplicated pregnancies who gave birth between 2000 and 2012 to a singleton baby in cephalic presentation at between 37 and 41 completed weeks’ gestation. Of the 1 251 420 births, 1 171 703 (93.6%) were planned in hospital labour wards, 71 505 (5.7%) in birth centres and 8212 (0.7%) at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of birth, normal labour and birth, interventions and procedures during labour and birth, maternal complications, admission to special care/high dependency or intensive care units (mother or infant) and perinatal mortality (intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death). RESULTS: Compared with planned hospital births, the odds of normal labour and birth were over twice as high in planned birth centre births (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.72; 99% CI 2.63 to 2.81) and nearly six times as high in planned home births (AOR 5.91; 99% CI 5.15 to 6.78). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of intrapartum stillbirths, early or late neonatal deaths between the three planned places of birth. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Australia-wide study to examine outcomes by planned place of birth. For healthy women in Australia having an uncomplicated pregnancy, planned births in birth centres or at home are associated with positive maternal outcomes although the number of homebirths was small overall. There were no significant differences in the perinatal mortality rate, although the absolute numbers of deaths were very small and therefore firm conclusions cannot be drawn about perinatal mortality outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6830673/ /pubmed/31662359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029192 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Homer, Caroline S E
Cheah, Seong L
Rossiter, Chris
Dahlen, Hannah G
Ellwood, David
Foureur, Maralyn J
Forster, Della A
McLachlan, Helen L
Oats, Jeremy J N
Sibbritt, David
Thornton, Charlene
Scarf, Vanessa L
Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
title Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
title_full Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
title_fullStr Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
title_full_unstemmed Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
title_short Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
title_sort maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029192
work_keys_str_mv AT homercarolinese maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT cheahseongl maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT rossiterchris maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT dahlenhannahg maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT ellwooddavid maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT foureurmaralynj maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT forsterdellaa maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT mclachlanhelenl maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT oatsjeremyjn maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT sibbrittdavid maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT thorntoncharlene maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy
AT scarfvanessal maternalandperinataloutcomesbyplannedplaceofbirthinaustralia20002012alinkedpopulationdatastudy