Cargando…

Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study

INTRODUCTION: Total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis results in a satisfactory outcome in the majority of patients, although up to one in five patients may be dissatisfied with the outcome. Persistent pain is a main contributor to patient dissatisfaction, and femoral and tibial component ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Jonbergen, Hans-Peter, Landman, Ellie, Horst, Maarten, Westerbeek, Robin, Kleinlugtenbelt, Ydo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31678946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031166
_version_ 1783465820774465536
author van Jonbergen, Hans-Peter
Landman, Ellie
Horst, Maarten
Westerbeek, Robin
Kleinlugtenbelt, Ydo
author_facet van Jonbergen, Hans-Peter
Landman, Ellie
Horst, Maarten
Westerbeek, Robin
Kleinlugtenbelt, Ydo
author_sort van Jonbergen, Hans-Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis results in a satisfactory outcome in the majority of patients, although up to one in five patients may be dissatisfied with the outcome. Persistent pain is a main contributor to patient dissatisfaction, and femoral and tibial component malrotation have been identified as a potential cause for both persistent pain and patellofemoral problems. Based on the assumption that component malrotation is the causative factor for persistent pain, early revision for patients with symptomatic malrotated components has been advocated in the literature. However, convincing evidence that component malrotation indeed results in less than optimal outcomes is lacking. This study aims to assess the relation between knee prosthesis component rotation and patient-reported outcomes in a large group of patients and to determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, prospective observational cohort study, a total of 500 patients will undergo TKR. All patients will have a 3D-CT assessment of femoral and tibial component rotation within 8 weeks after surgery. Outcome measures will include the Oxford Knee Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D, visual analogue scale for pain, the American Knee Society Score and the knee joint range of motion. We will assess the relation between femoral, tibial and combined component rotation and patient-reported outcome measures at 8 weeks and 1 year of follow-up, and we will determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the Isala Hospital ethics committee. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7635.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68306912019-11-20 Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study van Jonbergen, Hans-Peter Landman, Ellie Horst, Maarten Westerbeek, Robin Kleinlugtenbelt, Ydo BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging INTRODUCTION: Total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis results in a satisfactory outcome in the majority of patients, although up to one in five patients may be dissatisfied with the outcome. Persistent pain is a main contributor to patient dissatisfaction, and femoral and tibial component malrotation have been identified as a potential cause for both persistent pain and patellofemoral problems. Based on the assumption that component malrotation is the causative factor for persistent pain, early revision for patients with symptomatic malrotated components has been advocated in the literature. However, convincing evidence that component malrotation indeed results in less than optimal outcomes is lacking. This study aims to assess the relation between knee prosthesis component rotation and patient-reported outcomes in a large group of patients and to determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, prospective observational cohort study, a total of 500 patients will undergo TKR. All patients will have a 3D-CT assessment of femoral and tibial component rotation within 8 weeks after surgery. Outcome measures will include the Oxford Knee Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D, visual analogue scale for pain, the American Knee Society Score and the knee joint range of motion. We will assess the relation between femoral, tibial and combined component rotation and patient-reported outcome measures at 8 weeks and 1 year of follow-up, and we will determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the Isala Hospital ethics committee. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7635. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6830691/ /pubmed/31678946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031166 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Radiology and Imaging
van Jonbergen, Hans-Peter
Landman, Ellie
Horst, Maarten
Westerbeek, Robin
Kleinlugtenbelt, Ydo
Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study
title Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study
title_full Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study
title_fullStr Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study
title_short Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study
title_sort prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the crack study
topic Radiology and Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31678946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031166
work_keys_str_mv AT vanjonbergenhanspeter prospectiveobservationalstudytoevaluatetherelationbetweenpatientreportedoutcomesandcomponentrotationintotalkneereplacementprotocolforthecrackstudy
AT landmanellie prospectiveobservationalstudytoevaluatetherelationbetweenpatientreportedoutcomesandcomponentrotationintotalkneereplacementprotocolforthecrackstudy
AT horstmaarten prospectiveobservationalstudytoevaluatetherelationbetweenpatientreportedoutcomesandcomponentrotationintotalkneereplacementprotocolforthecrackstudy
AT westerbeekrobin prospectiveobservationalstudytoevaluatetherelationbetweenpatientreportedoutcomesandcomponentrotationintotalkneereplacementprotocolforthecrackstudy
AT kleinlugtenbeltydo prospectiveobservationalstudytoevaluatetherelationbetweenpatientreportedoutcomesandcomponentrotationintotalkneereplacementprotocolforthecrackstudy