Cargando…

Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Bergen, Addi P. L., van Loon, Annelies, de Wit, Matty A. S., Hoff, Stella J. M., Wolf, Judith R. L. M., van Hemert, Albert M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224687
_version_ 1783465837384957952
author van Bergen, Addi P. L.
van Loon, Annelies
de Wit, Matty A. S.
Hoff, Stella J. M.
Wolf, Judith R. L. M.
van Hemert, Albert M.
author_facet van Bergen, Addi P. L.
van Loon, Annelies
de Wit, Matty A. S.
Hoff, Stella J. M.
Wolf, Judith R. L. M.
van Hemert, Albert M.
author_sort van Bergen, Addi P. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant groups is called for. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used, employing quantitative data from the Netherlands Public Health Monitor along with qualitative interviews. Data from 1,803 adults aged 19 years or older of Surinamese, 1,009 of Moroccan and 1,164 of Turkish background and 19,318 native Dutch living in the four largest cities in the Netherlands were used to test the factorial structure of the SEI-HS and differential item functioning across immigrant groups. Additionally, 52 respondents with a high score on the SEI-HS and from different background were interviewed on the item content of the SEI-HS and subjective feelings of exclusion. For each SEI-HS item the semantic, conceptual and contextual connotations were coded and compared between the immigrant groups and native Dutch. RESULTS: High levels of social exclusion were found in 20.0% of the urban population of Surinamese origin, 20.9% of Moroccan, 28.7% of Turkish and 4.2% of native Dutch origin. The 4-factor structure of the SEI-HS was confirmed in all three immigrant groups. None of the items demonstrated substantial differential item functioning in relation to immigration background. The interviews uncovered some methodological shortcomings, but these did not substantially impact the observed excess of social exclusion in immigrant groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides evidence in support of the validity of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish background and confirms the major social exclusion of these immigrant groups in the main cities in the Netherlands. Policy measures to enhance social inclusion and reduce exclusion are urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68308092019-11-14 Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study van Bergen, Addi P. L. van Loon, Annelies de Wit, Matty A. S. Hoff, Stella J. M. Wolf, Judith R. L. M. van Hemert, Albert M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant groups is called for. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used, employing quantitative data from the Netherlands Public Health Monitor along with qualitative interviews. Data from 1,803 adults aged 19 years or older of Surinamese, 1,009 of Moroccan and 1,164 of Turkish background and 19,318 native Dutch living in the four largest cities in the Netherlands were used to test the factorial structure of the SEI-HS and differential item functioning across immigrant groups. Additionally, 52 respondents with a high score on the SEI-HS and from different background were interviewed on the item content of the SEI-HS and subjective feelings of exclusion. For each SEI-HS item the semantic, conceptual and contextual connotations were coded and compared between the immigrant groups and native Dutch. RESULTS: High levels of social exclusion were found in 20.0% of the urban population of Surinamese origin, 20.9% of Moroccan, 28.7% of Turkish and 4.2% of native Dutch origin. The 4-factor structure of the SEI-HS was confirmed in all three immigrant groups. None of the items demonstrated substantial differential item functioning in relation to immigration background. The interviews uncovered some methodological shortcomings, but these did not substantially impact the observed excess of social exclusion in immigrant groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides evidence in support of the validity of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish background and confirms the major social exclusion of these immigrant groups in the main cities in the Netherlands. Policy measures to enhance social inclusion and reduce exclusion are urgently needed. Public Library of Science 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6830809/ /pubmed/31689337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224687 Text en © 2019 van Bergen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Bergen, Addi P. L.
van Loon, Annelies
de Wit, Matty A. S.
Hoff, Stella J. M.
Wolf, Judith R. L. M.
van Hemert, Albert M.
Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study
title Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study
title_full Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study
title_fullStr Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study
title_short Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study
title_sort evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the dutch version of the social exclusion index for health surveys (sei-hs): a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224687
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbergenaddipl evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT vanloonannelies evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT dewitmattyas evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT hoffstellajm evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT wolfjudithrlm evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT vanhemertalbertm evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy