Cargando…
HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study
INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Guatemala. Self-collection testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been suggested as a form of cervical cancer screening to facilitate access in LMICs. This study assessed and compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029158 |
_version_ | 1783465841301389312 |
---|---|
author | Murchland, Audrey R. Gottschlich, Anna Bevilacqua, Kristin Pineda, Andres Sandoval-Ramírez, Berner Andrée Alvarez, Christian S Ogilvie, Gina S Carey, Thomas E Prince, Mark Dean, Michael Mendoza Montano, Carlos Rivera-Andrade, Alvaro Meza, Rafael |
author_facet | Murchland, Audrey R. Gottschlich, Anna Bevilacqua, Kristin Pineda, Andres Sandoval-Ramírez, Berner Andrée Alvarez, Christian S Ogilvie, Gina S Carey, Thomas E Prince, Mark Dean, Michael Mendoza Montano, Carlos Rivera-Andrade, Alvaro Meza, Rafael |
author_sort | Murchland, Audrey R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Guatemala. Self-collection testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been suggested as a form of cervical cancer screening to facilitate access in LMICs. This study assessed and compared the acceptability of self-collection HPV testing in two rural, indigenous and ethnically distinct communities in Guatemala: Santiago Atitlán, Sololá and Livingston, Izabal. METHODS: All participants, women between the ages of 18 and 60, completed a questionnaire. Eligible participants were also asked to self-collect a vaginal sample and complete a questionnaire regarding comfort and acceptability. Self-collected samples were tested for high-risk HPV using the real-time PCR Hybribio kit. RESULTS: In the indigenous community of Santiago Atitlán, of 438 age-eligible participants, 94% completed self-collection. Of those, 81% found it comfortable and 98% were willing to use it as a form of screening. In the multiethnic (Afro-Caribbean, indigenous) community of Livingston, of 322 age-eligible participants, 53% chose to self-collect. Among those who took the test, 83% found it comfortable and 95% were willing to use it as a form of screening. In Livingston, literacy (can read and/or write vs cannot read or write) was higher in women who chose to self-collect (prevalence ratio 2.25; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.68). Ethnicity, history of screening and reproductive history were not associated with willingness to self-collect in Livingston. Women in Santiago reported less prior use of healthcare than women in Livingston. Overall, 19% (106/549) of samples tested positive for high-risk HPV. CONCLUSION: Among women willing to self-collect in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala, self-collection for HPV testing is highly acceptable. However, willingness to try self-collection might vary across communities and settings. Women from a community that used less healthcare were more likely to choose self-collection. Further research is necessary to determine what factors influence a woman’s choice to self-collect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6830827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68308272019-11-20 HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study Murchland, Audrey R. Gottschlich, Anna Bevilacqua, Kristin Pineda, Andres Sandoval-Ramírez, Berner Andrée Alvarez, Christian S Ogilvie, Gina S Carey, Thomas E Prince, Mark Dean, Michael Mendoza Montano, Carlos Rivera-Andrade, Alvaro Meza, Rafael BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Guatemala. Self-collection testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been suggested as a form of cervical cancer screening to facilitate access in LMICs. This study assessed and compared the acceptability of self-collection HPV testing in two rural, indigenous and ethnically distinct communities in Guatemala: Santiago Atitlán, Sololá and Livingston, Izabal. METHODS: All participants, women between the ages of 18 and 60, completed a questionnaire. Eligible participants were also asked to self-collect a vaginal sample and complete a questionnaire regarding comfort and acceptability. Self-collected samples were tested for high-risk HPV using the real-time PCR Hybribio kit. RESULTS: In the indigenous community of Santiago Atitlán, of 438 age-eligible participants, 94% completed self-collection. Of those, 81% found it comfortable and 98% were willing to use it as a form of screening. In the multiethnic (Afro-Caribbean, indigenous) community of Livingston, of 322 age-eligible participants, 53% chose to self-collect. Among those who took the test, 83% found it comfortable and 95% were willing to use it as a form of screening. In Livingston, literacy (can read and/or write vs cannot read or write) was higher in women who chose to self-collect (prevalence ratio 2.25; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.68). Ethnicity, history of screening and reproductive history were not associated with willingness to self-collect in Livingston. Women in Santiago reported less prior use of healthcare than women in Livingston. Overall, 19% (106/549) of samples tested positive for high-risk HPV. CONCLUSION: Among women willing to self-collect in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala, self-collection for HPV testing is highly acceptable. However, willingness to try self-collection might vary across communities and settings. Women from a community that used less healthcare were more likely to choose self-collection. Further research is necessary to determine what factors influence a woman’s choice to self-collect. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6830827/ /pubmed/31662358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029158 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Murchland, Audrey R. Gottschlich, Anna Bevilacqua, Kristin Pineda, Andres Sandoval-Ramírez, Berner Andrée Alvarez, Christian S Ogilvie, Gina S Carey, Thomas E Prince, Mark Dean, Michael Mendoza Montano, Carlos Rivera-Andrade, Alvaro Meza, Rafael HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
title | HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | hpv self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in guatemala: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murchlandaudreyr hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT gottschlichanna hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT bevilacquakristin hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT pinedaandres hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT sandovalramirezbernerandree hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT alvarezchristians hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT ogilvieginas hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT careythomase hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT princemark hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT deanmichael hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT mendozamontanocarlos hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT riveraandradealvaro hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy AT mezarafael hpvselfsamplingacceptabilityinruralandindigenouscommunitiesinguatemalaacrosssectionalstudy |