Cargando…

Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System

Introduction Despite a call for increased research by family-medicine physicians, there is no data on the demographics of those awarded a National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 grant.  Objective The purpose of the study was to assess recent NIH R01 funding trends over the last decade in family medi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berg, Erich J, Ashurst, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754582
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5847
_version_ 1783465844520517632
author Berg, Erich J
Ashurst, John
author_facet Berg, Erich J
Ashurst, John
author_sort Berg, Erich J
collection PubMed
description Introduction Despite a call for increased research by family-medicine physicians, there is no data on the demographics of those awarded a National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 grant.  Objective The purpose of the study was to assess recent NIH R01 funding trends over the last decade in family medicine. Methods  A retrospective analysis of NIH R01 grant funding in family medicine was conducted by extracting demographic data from the NIH’s Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database from 2008 through 2017. Demographics were reported as percentages, and comparisons of the groups were performed by the t-test.  Results  From 2008 to 2017, the NIH awarded 139 R01 grants to principal investigators (PI) in family medicine. Males comprised 51.80% of all awardees, and those holding a doctorate of medicine (MD) made up 43.88% of the awardees. No one holding a Doctorate of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree received an NIH R01 grant during the timeframe studied. A total of 81.97% of all MDs held a dual degree. When gender and degree were considered, no statistical difference was observed for the total amount of dollars awarded.  Conclusion For the years studied, a disparity related to medical degrees was noted for those family-medicine physicians who received an NIH R01 grant. However, no gender disparity was observed. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68308442019-11-21 Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System Berg, Erich J Ashurst, John Cureus Osteopathic Medicine Introduction Despite a call for increased research by family-medicine physicians, there is no data on the demographics of those awarded a National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 grant.  Objective The purpose of the study was to assess recent NIH R01 funding trends over the last decade in family medicine. Methods  A retrospective analysis of NIH R01 grant funding in family medicine was conducted by extracting demographic data from the NIH’s Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database from 2008 through 2017. Demographics were reported as percentages, and comparisons of the groups were performed by the t-test.  Results  From 2008 to 2017, the NIH awarded 139 R01 grants to principal investigators (PI) in family medicine. Males comprised 51.80% of all awardees, and those holding a doctorate of medicine (MD) made up 43.88% of the awardees. No one holding a Doctorate of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree received an NIH R01 grant during the timeframe studied. A total of 81.97% of all MDs held a dual degree. When gender and degree were considered, no statistical difference was observed for the total amount of dollars awarded.  Conclusion For the years studied, a disparity related to medical degrees was noted for those family-medicine physicians who received an NIH R01 grant. However, no gender disparity was observed.  Cureus 2019-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6830844/ /pubmed/31754582 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5847 Text en Copyright © 2019, Berg et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Osteopathic Medicine
Berg, Erich J
Ashurst, John
Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System
title Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System
title_full Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System
title_fullStr Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System
title_short Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System
title_sort patterns of recent national institutes of health funding in family medicine: analysis using the nih research portfolio online reporting tools expenditures and results system
topic Osteopathic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754582
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5847
work_keys_str_mv AT bergerichj patternsofrecentnationalinstitutesofhealthfundinginfamilymedicineanalysisusingthenihresearchportfolioonlinereportingtoolsexpendituresandresultssystem
AT ashurstjohn patternsofrecentnationalinstitutesofhealthfundinginfamilymedicineanalysisusingthenihresearchportfolioonlinereportingtoolsexpendituresandresultssystem