Cargando…

Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization

This study aimed at evaluating efficacy and safety of thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis on coronary thrombus burden in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous catheterization, comparing their effects on myocardial perfusion throug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Yuyang, Fu, Xianghua, Wang, Yanbo, Fan, Yanming, Wu, Yanqiang, Wang, Wenlu, Zhang, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000743
_version_ 1783465866192486400
author Xiao, Yuyang
Fu, Xianghua
Wang, Yanbo
Fan, Yanming
Wu, Yanqiang
Wang, Wenlu
Zhang, Qian
author_facet Xiao, Yuyang
Fu, Xianghua
Wang, Yanbo
Fan, Yanming
Wu, Yanqiang
Wang, Wenlu
Zhang, Qian
author_sort Xiao, Yuyang
collection PubMed
description This study aimed at evaluating efficacy and safety of thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis on coronary thrombus burden in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous catheterization, comparing their effects on myocardial perfusion through index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: From January 2017 to January 2018, STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary catheterization were enrolled and randomly assigned to receiving thrombus aspiration (TA group) or intracoronary thrombolysis (IT group). IMR, SPECT, and other conventional measurements were adopted to assess myocardial perfusion. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and complications were recorded over a 90-day follow-up and a 12-month follow-up after the procedure. RESULTS: The study consisted of 38 patients in the IT group and 33 in the TA group. After recanalization, thrombus burden score, corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, the proportion of TIMI myocardial perfusion 3 grade, and IMR in the IT group were significantly better than those of the TA group (P<0.05). During the 90-day follow-up, no difference was observed in cardiac function and MACEs. During the 12-month follow-up, there were significant differences in infarct size of SPECT (18.56±8.56 vs. 22.67±7.66, P=0.046), left ventricular ejection fraction of echocardiography (58.13±5.92 vs. 55.17±5.68, P=0.043), and the composite MACEs between the two groups (P=0.034). CONCLUSION: Thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis are effective and safe strategies in managing high coronary thrombus burden in STEMI patients. Compared with aspiration, intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis is more beneficial in improving myocardial microcirculation perfusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6830956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68309562019-11-26 Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization Xiao, Yuyang Fu, Xianghua Wang, Yanbo Fan, Yanming Wu, Yanqiang Wang, Wenlu Zhang, Qian Coron Artery Dis Myocardial Infarction/Cardiogenic Shock This study aimed at evaluating efficacy and safety of thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis on coronary thrombus burden in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous catheterization, comparing their effects on myocardial perfusion through index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: From January 2017 to January 2018, STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary catheterization were enrolled and randomly assigned to receiving thrombus aspiration (TA group) or intracoronary thrombolysis (IT group). IMR, SPECT, and other conventional measurements were adopted to assess myocardial perfusion. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and complications were recorded over a 90-day follow-up and a 12-month follow-up after the procedure. RESULTS: The study consisted of 38 patients in the IT group and 33 in the TA group. After recanalization, thrombus burden score, corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, the proportion of TIMI myocardial perfusion 3 grade, and IMR in the IT group were significantly better than those of the TA group (P<0.05). During the 90-day follow-up, no difference was observed in cardiac function and MACEs. During the 12-month follow-up, there were significant differences in infarct size of SPECT (18.56±8.56 vs. 22.67±7.66, P=0.046), left ventricular ejection fraction of echocardiography (58.13±5.92 vs. 55.17±5.68, P=0.043), and the composite MACEs between the two groups (P=0.034). CONCLUSION: Thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis are effective and safe strategies in managing high coronary thrombus burden in STEMI patients. Compared with aspiration, intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis is more beneficial in improving myocardial microcirculation perfusion. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-12 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6830956/ /pubmed/30998610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000743 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Myocardial Infarction/Cardiogenic Shock
Xiao, Yuyang
Fu, Xianghua
Wang, Yanbo
Fan, Yanming
Wu, Yanqiang
Wang, Wenlu
Zhang, Qian
Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
title Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
title_full Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
title_fullStr Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
title_short Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
title_sort effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization
topic Myocardial Infarction/Cardiogenic Shock
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000743
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyuyang effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization
AT fuxianghua effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization
AT wangyanbo effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization
AT fanyanming effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization
AT wuyanqiang effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization
AT wangwenlu effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization
AT zhangqian effectsofdifferentstrategiesonhighthrombusburdeninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronarycatheterization