Cargando…

Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are under-recognized and under-reported in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) population, with up to 95% of all ADRs not reported. Compared with non-elderly adults, pediatric patients are 3 times more likely to experience an ADR, with varying rates from 0.6% to 16....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cammack, Betsy, Oschman, Alexandra, Lewis, Tamorah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000203
_version_ 1783465882768375808
author Cammack, Betsy
Oschman, Alexandra
Lewis, Tamorah
author_facet Cammack, Betsy
Oschman, Alexandra
Lewis, Tamorah
author_sort Cammack, Betsy
collection PubMed
description Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are under-recognized and under-reported in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) population, with up to 95% of all ADRs not reported. Compared with non-elderly adults, pediatric patients are 3 times more likely to experience an ADR, with varying rates from 0.6% to 16.8%. The Children’s Mercy NICU has an ADR rate of 0.29% (2015). This high rate presents an opportunity to increase recognition and reporting, and improve characterization of ADRs in the NICU. METHODS: The primary aim of this quality improvement project was for 70% of patients who received specified medications (indomethacin, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, lorazepam, dexamethasone, or hydrocortisone) in the first 3 months of age to be assessed daily for ADRs. We selected these medications due to the frequency of use and well-understood ADR associations. For each ADR recognized, the Naranjo score, was calculated and compared with the neonatal-specific Du score to assess the effectiveness of ADR characterization. RESULTS: Implementation occurred on May 15, 2017. We completed 3 PDSA cycles over 1 year. The bedside monitoring tool was utilized 83% of the time. Twenty-eight potential ADRs were identified, far exceeding the number reported before implementation. The Du score appeared to better characterize ADRs compared with the Naranjo score. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a bedside monitoring tool improves ADR detection. We experienced challenges with consistently identifying patients on target drugs and getting the tool to the bedside. Application of the Du score for ADR classification in neonates appears to be more appropriate than the use of the Naranjo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6831056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68310562019-11-19 Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project Cammack, Betsy Oschman, Alexandra Lewis, Tamorah Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI projects from single institutions Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are under-recognized and under-reported in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) population, with up to 95% of all ADRs not reported. Compared with non-elderly adults, pediatric patients are 3 times more likely to experience an ADR, with varying rates from 0.6% to 16.8%. The Children’s Mercy NICU has an ADR rate of 0.29% (2015). This high rate presents an opportunity to increase recognition and reporting, and improve characterization of ADRs in the NICU. METHODS: The primary aim of this quality improvement project was for 70% of patients who received specified medications (indomethacin, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, lorazepam, dexamethasone, or hydrocortisone) in the first 3 months of age to be assessed daily for ADRs. We selected these medications due to the frequency of use and well-understood ADR associations. For each ADR recognized, the Naranjo score, was calculated and compared with the neonatal-specific Du score to assess the effectiveness of ADR characterization. RESULTS: Implementation occurred on May 15, 2017. We completed 3 PDSA cycles over 1 year. The bedside monitoring tool was utilized 83% of the time. Twenty-eight potential ADRs were identified, far exceeding the number reported before implementation. The Du score appeared to better characterize ADRs compared with the Naranjo score. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a bedside monitoring tool improves ADR detection. We experienced challenges with consistently identifying patients on target drugs and getting the tool to the bedside. Application of the Du score for ADR classification in neonates appears to be more appropriate than the use of the Naranjo. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6831056/ /pubmed/31745506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000203 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Individual QI projects from single institutions
Cammack, Betsy
Oschman, Alexandra
Lewis, Tamorah
Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project
title Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project
title_fullStr Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full_unstemmed Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project
title_short Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project
title_sort improving recognition and reporting of adverse drug reactions in the nicu: a quality improvement project
topic Individual QI projects from single institutions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000203
work_keys_str_mv AT cammackbetsy improvingrecognitionandreportingofadversedrugreactionsinthenicuaqualityimprovementproject
AT oschmanalexandra improvingrecognitionandreportingofadversedrugreactionsinthenicuaqualityimprovementproject
AT lewistamorah improvingrecognitionandreportingofadversedrugreactionsinthenicuaqualityimprovementproject