Cargando…
Radial artery occlusion with a kaolin-filled pad after transradial cardiac catheterization
Radial artery occlusion (RAO) occurs in 2% to 18% of patients after transradial access (TRA) cardiac catheterization. Using a kaolin-filled pad (QuikClot) reduces compression time during TRA and might reduce RAO. We examined the RAO risk with the kaolin-filled pad after TRA cardiac catheterization....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30431581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013134 |
Sumario: | Radial artery occlusion (RAO) occurs in 2% to 18% of patients after transradial access (TRA) cardiac catheterization. Using a kaolin-filled pad (QuikClot) reduces compression time during TRA and might reduce RAO. We examined the RAO risk with the kaolin-filled pad after TRA cardiac catheterization. This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 260 patients who underwent TRA cardiac catheterization in a cardiac ward of a Medical Center from 2012 to 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: the case group (n = 130) was postoperatively treated with a kaolin-filled pad, and the control group (n = 130) was treated with conventional hemostasis. Color duplex ultrasound was used to evaluate the 24-hour and 1-month postoperative radial artery flow velocity, diameter, patency, and RAO risk. RAO risk was not significantly different between the case and control groups after 24 hours (4.6% vs 5.4%, P = .776) or after 1 month (5.4% vs 6.1%, P = .789), regardless of whether it was a first TRA cardiac catheterization (after 24 hours [P = .153] or after 1month [P = .617], respectively) or a repeated TRA cardiac catheterization (after 24 hours [P = .754] or after 1month [P = .753], respectively). Using a kaolin-filled pad after TRA cardiac catheterization did not significantly reduce RAO risk compared with conventional hemostasis. |
---|