Cargando…
Response on “commentary on “using resonance synchronous spectroscopy to characterize the reactivity and electrophilicity of biologically relevant sulfane sulfur”. Evidence that the methodology is inadequate because it only measures unspecific light scattering”. The evidence is incorrect
Autores principales: | Liu, Huaiwei, Wang, Qingda, Li, Huanjie, Xun, Luying |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101312 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Commentary on “Using resonance synchronous spectroscopy to characterize the reactivity and electrophilicity of biologically relevant sulfane sulfur”. Evidence that the methodology is inadequate because it only measures unspecific light scattering
por: Cuevasanta, Ernesto, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Using resonance synchronous spectroscopy to characterize the reactivity and electrophilicity of biologically relevant sulfane sulfur
por: Li, Huanjie, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
A Red Fluorescent Protein-Based Probe for Detection of Intracellular Reactive Sulfane Sulfur
por: Li, Zimai, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Pleiotropic Regulator AdpA Regulates the Removal of Excessive Sulfane Sulfur in Streptomyces coelicolor
por: Lu, Ting, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
OxyR senses sulfane sulfur and activates the genes for its removal in Escherichia coli
por: Hou, Ningke, et al.
Publicado: (2019)