Cargando…

Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates

This prospective observational study aimed to compare the changes in placental vascular indices and placental volume using three-dimensional power Doppler (3DPD) ultrasound in pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We enrolled 396 women with singleton pregnancies from September 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Sue-Jar, Chen, Chie-Pein, Sun, Fang-Ju, Chen, Chen-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31614452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101651
_version_ 1783466113624965120
author Chen, Sue-Jar
Chen, Chie-Pein
Sun, Fang-Ju
Chen, Chen-Yu
author_facet Chen, Sue-Jar
Chen, Chie-Pein
Sun, Fang-Ju
Chen, Chen-Yu
author_sort Chen, Sue-Jar
collection PubMed
description This prospective observational study aimed to compare the changes in placental vascular indices and placental volume using three-dimensional power Doppler (3DPD) ultrasound in pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We enrolled 396 women with singleton pregnancies from September 2013 to June 2016. Placental vascular indices, including the vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI), and placental volume were obtained using 3DPD ultrasound in the first and second trimesters. Of the enrolled women, 21 delivered SGA neonates and 375 did not. In the first trimester, the SGA group had a significantly lower mean FI (25.10 ± 7.51 versus 33.10 ± 10.97, p < 0.001) and VFI (4.59 ± 1.95 versus 6.28 ± 2.35, p = 0.001) than the non-SGA group. However, there was no significant difference in the placental volume between the two groups during the first trimester. In the second trimester, the SGA group also had a significantly lower mean FI (27.08 ± 7.97 versus 31.54 ± 11.01, p = 0.022) and VFI (6.68 ± 1.71 versus 8.68 ± 3.09, p < 0.001) than the non-SGA group. In addition, a significantly smaller placental volume was noted in the SGA group (104.80 ± 24.23 cm(3) versus 122.67 ± 26.35 cm(3), p = 0.003) than in the non-SGA group during the second trimester. The results showed that a decreased placental VFI occurred earlier than a decreased placental volume in SGA pregnancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6832172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68321722019-11-20 Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates Chen, Sue-Jar Chen, Chie-Pein Sun, Fang-Ju Chen, Chen-Yu J Clin Med Article This prospective observational study aimed to compare the changes in placental vascular indices and placental volume using three-dimensional power Doppler (3DPD) ultrasound in pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We enrolled 396 women with singleton pregnancies from September 2013 to June 2016. Placental vascular indices, including the vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI), and placental volume were obtained using 3DPD ultrasound in the first and second trimesters. Of the enrolled women, 21 delivered SGA neonates and 375 did not. In the first trimester, the SGA group had a significantly lower mean FI (25.10 ± 7.51 versus 33.10 ± 10.97, p < 0.001) and VFI (4.59 ± 1.95 versus 6.28 ± 2.35, p = 0.001) than the non-SGA group. However, there was no significant difference in the placental volume between the two groups during the first trimester. In the second trimester, the SGA group also had a significantly lower mean FI (27.08 ± 7.97 versus 31.54 ± 11.01, p = 0.022) and VFI (6.68 ± 1.71 versus 8.68 ± 3.09, p < 0.001) than the non-SGA group. In addition, a significantly smaller placental volume was noted in the SGA group (104.80 ± 24.23 cm(3) versus 122.67 ± 26.35 cm(3), p = 0.003) than in the non-SGA group during the second trimester. The results showed that a decreased placental VFI occurred earlier than a decreased placental volume in SGA pregnancies. MDPI 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6832172/ /pubmed/31614452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101651 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Sue-Jar
Chen, Chie-Pein
Sun, Fang-Ju
Chen, Chen-Yu
Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates
title Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates
title_full Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates
title_fullStr Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates
title_short Comparison of Placental Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Vascular Indices and Placental Volume in Pregnancies with Small for Gestational Age Neonates
title_sort comparison of placental three-dimensional power doppler vascular indices and placental volume in pregnancies with small for gestational age neonates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31614452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101651
work_keys_str_mv AT chensuejar comparisonofplacentalthreedimensionalpowerdopplervascularindicesandplacentalvolumeinpregnancieswithsmallforgestationalageneonates
AT chenchiepein comparisonofplacentalthreedimensionalpowerdopplervascularindicesandplacentalvolumeinpregnancieswithsmallforgestationalageneonates
AT sunfangju comparisonofplacentalthreedimensionalpowerdopplervascularindicesandplacentalvolumeinpregnancieswithsmallforgestationalageneonates
AT chenchenyu comparisonofplacentalthreedimensionalpowerdopplervascularindicesandplacentalvolumeinpregnancieswithsmallforgestationalageneonates