Cargando…

Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism

BACKGROUND: Screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth. OBJECTIVE: Compare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Juraibah, Fahad, Alothaim, Ali, Al Eyaid, Wafa, AlMutair, Angham Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31580694
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.291
_version_ 1783466144202489856
author Al Juraibah, Fahad
Alothaim, Ali
Al Eyaid, Wafa
AlMutair, Angham Nasser
author_facet Al Juraibah, Fahad
Alothaim, Ali
Al Eyaid, Wafa
AlMutair, Angham Nasser
author_sort Al Juraibah, Fahad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth. OBJECTIVE: Compare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-stick samples for determining thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels for the detection of CH. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy. SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all infants who were delivered during the period from May 2011 to May 2013. As part of routine newborn screening, both cord blood and heel-stick samples were collected from each newborn for CH screening by measuring TSH levels. A cord TSH level was considered positive if the concentration of TSH was more than 60 mIU/L and negative if less than 30 mIU/L. Any cord TSH level between 30-60 mIU/L was considered borderline, and free T4 was measured from the same cord sample. The result was considered positive if the free T4 level was below 9 pmol/L. Heel-stick TSH levels more than 20 µU/L were considered positive. All newborns with positive results were recalled and a peripheral venous sample was taken for TSH and free T4 for confirmation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and recall rates. SAMPLE SIZE: 17 729 screened babies. RESULTS: Of 17 729 neonates screened, 7 were diagnosed as having primary CH. All confirmed cases were detected by both cord and heel-stick TSH levels: 88 cord results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%, with a recall rate of 0.04%) and 305 heel-stick results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.3%, with a recall rate of 1.68%). CONCLUSION: Both cord and heel-stick TSH testing detected all cases of CH. Cord testing was superior to heel-stick testing as the recall rate was lower. We think cord TSH testing is preferable when heel-stick is difficult or early discharge is the practice. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective; the timing of newborn screening for TSH sampling was premature. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6832320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68323202019-11-21 Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism Al Juraibah, Fahad Alothaim, Ali Al Eyaid, Wafa AlMutair, Angham Nasser Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth. OBJECTIVE: Compare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-stick samples for determining thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels for the detection of CH. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy. SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all infants who were delivered during the period from May 2011 to May 2013. As part of routine newborn screening, both cord blood and heel-stick samples were collected from each newborn for CH screening by measuring TSH levels. A cord TSH level was considered positive if the concentration of TSH was more than 60 mIU/L and negative if less than 30 mIU/L. Any cord TSH level between 30-60 mIU/L was considered borderline, and free T4 was measured from the same cord sample. The result was considered positive if the free T4 level was below 9 pmol/L. Heel-stick TSH levels more than 20 µU/L were considered positive. All newborns with positive results were recalled and a peripheral venous sample was taken for TSH and free T4 for confirmation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and recall rates. SAMPLE SIZE: 17 729 screened babies. RESULTS: Of 17 729 neonates screened, 7 were diagnosed as having primary CH. All confirmed cases were detected by both cord and heel-stick TSH levels: 88 cord results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%, with a recall rate of 0.04%) and 305 heel-stick results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.3%, with a recall rate of 1.68%). CONCLUSION: Both cord and heel-stick TSH testing detected all cases of CH. Cord testing was superior to heel-stick testing as the recall rate was lower. We think cord TSH testing is preferable when heel-stick is difficult or early discharge is the practice. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective; the timing of newborn screening for TSH sampling was premature. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2019-10 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6832320/ /pubmed/31580694 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.291 Text en Copyright © 2019, Annals of Saudi Medicine, Saudi Arabia This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). The details of which can be accessed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Al Juraibah, Fahad
Alothaim, Ali
Al Eyaid, Wafa
AlMutair, Angham Nasser
Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
title Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
title_full Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
title_fullStr Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
title_full_unstemmed Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
title_short Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
title_sort cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31580694
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.291
work_keys_str_mv AT aljuraibahfahad cordbloodversusheelsticksamplingformeasuringthyroidstimulatinghormonefornewbornscreeningofcongenitalhypothyroidism
AT alothaimali cordbloodversusheelsticksamplingformeasuringthyroidstimulatinghormonefornewbornscreeningofcongenitalhypothyroidism
AT aleyaidwafa cordbloodversusheelsticksamplingformeasuringthyroidstimulatinghormonefornewbornscreeningofcongenitalhypothyroidism
AT almutairanghamnasser cordbloodversusheelsticksamplingformeasuringthyroidstimulatinghormonefornewbornscreeningofcongenitalhypothyroidism