Cargando…
Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement
Individuals who sustained a spinal cord injury often lose important motor skills, and cannot perform basic daily living activities. Several assistive technologies, including robotic assistance and functional electrical stimulation, have been developed to restore lost functions. However, designing re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19204532 |
_version_ | 1783466162268405760 |
---|---|
author | Fonseca, Lucas Tigra, Wafa Navarro, Benjamin Guiraud, David Fattal, Charles Bó, Antônio Fachin-Martins, Emerson Leynaert, Violaine Gélis, Anthony Azevedo-Coste, Christine |
author_facet | Fonseca, Lucas Tigra, Wafa Navarro, Benjamin Guiraud, David Fattal, Charles Bó, Antônio Fachin-Martins, Emerson Leynaert, Violaine Gélis, Anthony Azevedo-Coste, Christine |
author_sort | Fonseca, Lucas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individuals who sustained a spinal cord injury often lose important motor skills, and cannot perform basic daily living activities. Several assistive technologies, including robotic assistance and functional electrical stimulation, have been developed to restore lost functions. However, designing reliable interfaces to control assistive devices for individuals with C4–C8 complete tetraplegia remains challenging. Although with limited grasping ability, they can often control upper arm movements via residual muscle contraction. In this article, we explore the feasibility of drawing upon these residual functions to pilot two devices, a robotic hand and an electrical stimulator. We studied two modalities, supra-lesional electromyography (EMG), and upper arm inertial sensors (IMU). We interpreted the muscle activity or arm movements of subjects with tetraplegia attempting to control the opening/closing of a robotic hand, and the extension/flexion of their own contralateral hand muscles activated by electrical stimulation. Two groups were recruited: eight subjects issued EMG-based commands; nine other subjects issued IMU-based commands. For each participant, we selected at least two muscles or gestures detectable by our algorithms. Despite little training, all participants could control the robot’s gestures or electrical stimulation of their own arm via muscle contraction or limb motion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6832396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68323962019-11-21 Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement Fonseca, Lucas Tigra, Wafa Navarro, Benjamin Guiraud, David Fattal, Charles Bó, Antônio Fachin-Martins, Emerson Leynaert, Violaine Gélis, Anthony Azevedo-Coste, Christine Sensors (Basel) Article Individuals who sustained a spinal cord injury often lose important motor skills, and cannot perform basic daily living activities. Several assistive technologies, including robotic assistance and functional electrical stimulation, have been developed to restore lost functions. However, designing reliable interfaces to control assistive devices for individuals with C4–C8 complete tetraplegia remains challenging. Although with limited grasping ability, they can often control upper arm movements via residual muscle contraction. In this article, we explore the feasibility of drawing upon these residual functions to pilot two devices, a robotic hand and an electrical stimulator. We studied two modalities, supra-lesional electromyography (EMG), and upper arm inertial sensors (IMU). We interpreted the muscle activity or arm movements of subjects with tetraplegia attempting to control the opening/closing of a robotic hand, and the extension/flexion of their own contralateral hand muscles activated by electrical stimulation. Two groups were recruited: eight subjects issued EMG-based commands; nine other subjects issued IMU-based commands. For each participant, we selected at least two muscles or gestures detectable by our algorithms. Despite little training, all participants could control the robot’s gestures or electrical stimulation of their own arm via muscle contraction or limb motion. MDPI 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6832396/ /pubmed/31635286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19204532 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fonseca, Lucas Tigra, Wafa Navarro, Benjamin Guiraud, David Fattal, Charles Bó, Antônio Fachin-Martins, Emerson Leynaert, Violaine Gélis, Anthony Azevedo-Coste, Christine Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement |
title | Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement |
title_full | Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement |
title_fullStr | Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement |
title_full_unstemmed | Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement |
title_short | Assisted Grasping in Individuals with Tetraplegia: Improving Control through Residual Muscle Contraction and Movement |
title_sort | assisted grasping in individuals with tetraplegia: improving control through residual muscle contraction and movement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19204532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fonsecalucas assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT tigrawafa assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT navarrobenjamin assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT guirauddavid assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT fattalcharles assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT boantonio assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT fachinmartinsemerson assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT leynaertviolaine assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT gelisanthony assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement AT azevedocostechristine assistedgraspinginindividualswithtetraplegiaimprovingcontrolthroughresidualmusclecontractionandmovement |