Cargando…

Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to inform the development of a screening tool which pre-operatively predicts which children are likely to develop velopharyngeal insufficiency, one of the causes of poor speech outcomes, following cleft palate repair. This would be highly beneficial as it woul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sainsbury, David, Williams, Caroline, de Blacam, Catherine, Mullen, Joanne, Chadha, Ambika, Wren, Yvonne, Hodgkinson, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31690349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1141-2
_version_ 1783466339509207040
author Sainsbury, David
Williams, Caroline
de Blacam, Catherine
Mullen, Joanne
Chadha, Ambika
Wren, Yvonne
Hodgkinson, Peter
author_facet Sainsbury, David
Williams, Caroline
de Blacam, Catherine
Mullen, Joanne
Chadha, Ambika
Wren, Yvonne
Hodgkinson, Peter
author_sort Sainsbury, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to inform the development of a screening tool which pre-operatively predicts which children are likely to develop velopharyngeal insufficiency, one of the causes of poor speech outcomes, following cleft palate repair. This would be highly beneficial as it would inform pre-operative counselling of parents, allow targeted speech and language therapy, and enable meaningful comparison of outcomes between surgeons, techniques, and institutions. Currently, it is unclear which factors influence speech outcomes. A systematic review investigating the non-interventional factors which potentially influence speech outcomes following cleft palate repair is warranted. This may be illuminating in itself or provide foundations for future studies. METHODS: A systematic review will be carried out according to Cochrane methodology and reported according to PRISMA guidelines (PLoS Med 6: e1000097, 2009). Systematic review software will be used to facilitate three-stage screening by two independent reviewers experienced in cleft lip and palate. Thereafter, data extraction and GRADE assessment will be performed in duplicate by five independent reviewers experienced in cleft lip and palate. Studies reporting the proportion of patients who were recommended or underwent secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary surgery for cleft palate will be included. The study findings will be tabulated and summarised. The primary outcome measure will be further speech surgery (either recommended or performed). The secondary outcome measure will be perceptual speech assessment for the presence of velopharyngeal insufficiency. A meta-analysis is planned. However, if this is not possible, due to the anticipated marked heterogeneity of study characteristics, pre-operative assessment, and the recorded outcome measures, a narrative synthesis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: This systematic review may provide sufficient data to inform the development of a screening tool to predict the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency prior to cleft palate repair. However, it is anticipated that these findings will provide the foundation for future studies in this area. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered on 19 December 2016 with PROSPERO CRD42017051624
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6833250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68332502019-11-08 Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol Sainsbury, David Williams, Caroline de Blacam, Catherine Mullen, Joanne Chadha, Ambika Wren, Yvonne Hodgkinson, Peter Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to inform the development of a screening tool which pre-operatively predicts which children are likely to develop velopharyngeal insufficiency, one of the causes of poor speech outcomes, following cleft palate repair. This would be highly beneficial as it would inform pre-operative counselling of parents, allow targeted speech and language therapy, and enable meaningful comparison of outcomes between surgeons, techniques, and institutions. Currently, it is unclear which factors influence speech outcomes. A systematic review investigating the non-interventional factors which potentially influence speech outcomes following cleft palate repair is warranted. This may be illuminating in itself or provide foundations for future studies. METHODS: A systematic review will be carried out according to Cochrane methodology and reported according to PRISMA guidelines (PLoS Med 6: e1000097, 2009). Systematic review software will be used to facilitate three-stage screening by two independent reviewers experienced in cleft lip and palate. Thereafter, data extraction and GRADE assessment will be performed in duplicate by five independent reviewers experienced in cleft lip and palate. Studies reporting the proportion of patients who were recommended or underwent secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary surgery for cleft palate will be included. The study findings will be tabulated and summarised. The primary outcome measure will be further speech surgery (either recommended or performed). The secondary outcome measure will be perceptual speech assessment for the presence of velopharyngeal insufficiency. A meta-analysis is planned. However, if this is not possible, due to the anticipated marked heterogeneity of study characteristics, pre-operative assessment, and the recorded outcome measures, a narrative synthesis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: This systematic review may provide sufficient data to inform the development of a screening tool to predict the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency prior to cleft palate repair. However, it is anticipated that these findings will provide the foundation for future studies in this area. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered on 19 December 2016 with PROSPERO CRD42017051624 BioMed Central 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6833250/ /pubmed/31690349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1141-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Sainsbury, David
Williams, Caroline
de Blacam, Catherine
Mullen, Joanne
Chadha, Ambika
Wren, Yvonne
Hodgkinson, Peter
Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol
title Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol
title_full Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol
title_fullStr Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol
title_short Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol
title_sort non-interventional factors influencing velopharyngeal function for speech in initial cleft palate repair: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31690349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1141-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sainsburydavid noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT williamscaroline noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT deblacamcatherine noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mullenjoanne noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chadhaambika noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT wrenyvonne noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT hodgkinsonpeter noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol
AT noninterventionalfactorsinfluencingvelopharyngealfunctionforspeechininitialcleftpalaterepairasystematicreviewprotocol