Cargando…

Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China

PURPOSE: Ethics review processes have become increasingly complex. The objective of this study was to explore the challenges currently faced in ethics reviews of clinical scientific research projects in China, with the goal of standardizing the structure of medical ethics committees and better prote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhu-Heng, Zhou, Guan-Hua, Sun, Li-Ping, Gang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519863539
_version_ 1783466375323320320
author Wang, Zhu-Heng
Zhou, Guan-Hua
Sun, Li-Ping
Gang, Jun
author_facet Wang, Zhu-Heng
Zhou, Guan-Hua
Sun, Li-Ping
Gang, Jun
author_sort Wang, Zhu-Heng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ethics review processes have become increasingly complex. The objective of this study was to explore the challenges currently faced in ethics reviews of clinical scientific research projects in China, with the goal of standardizing the structure of medical ethics committees and better protecting the rights and interests of research participants. METHODS: We reviewed and comprehensively analyzed the available literature discussing standardized ethics reviews of clinical scientific research projects. RESULTS: We identified the following problems: incomplete legislation, absence of supervision, vague review criteria, limitations of ethics committee competence, inadequate ethics consciousness, and poor tracking of reviews. In this paper, we suggest strategies for the development of future ethical reviews of clinical scientific research projects. CONCLUSION: To standardize the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China, it is necessary to establish relevant laws and regulations and implement supervisory responsibilities. Professional training of medical ethics committees is suggested as an effective way to improve the quality of ethics reviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6833390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68333902019-11-13 Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China Wang, Zhu-Heng Zhou, Guan-Hua Sun, Li-Ping Gang, Jun J Int Med Res Review PURPOSE: Ethics review processes have become increasingly complex. The objective of this study was to explore the challenges currently faced in ethics reviews of clinical scientific research projects in China, with the goal of standardizing the structure of medical ethics committees and better protecting the rights and interests of research participants. METHODS: We reviewed and comprehensively analyzed the available literature discussing standardized ethics reviews of clinical scientific research projects. RESULTS: We identified the following problems: incomplete legislation, absence of supervision, vague review criteria, limitations of ethics committee competence, inadequate ethics consciousness, and poor tracking of reviews. In this paper, we suggest strategies for the development of future ethical reviews of clinical scientific research projects. CONCLUSION: To standardize the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China, it is necessary to establish relevant laws and regulations and implement supervisory responsibilities. Professional training of medical ethics committees is suggested as an effective way to improve the quality of ethics reviews. SAGE Publications 2019-09-20 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6833390/ /pubmed/31537141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519863539 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Zhu-Heng
Zhou, Guan-Hua
Sun, Li-Ping
Gang, Jun
Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China
title Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China
title_full Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China
title_fullStr Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China
title_short Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China
title_sort challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in china
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519863539
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhuheng challengesintheethicsreviewprocessofclinicalscientificresearchprojectsinchina
AT zhouguanhua challengesintheethicsreviewprocessofclinicalscientificresearchprojectsinchina
AT sunliping challengesintheethicsreviewprocessofclinicalscientificresearchprojectsinchina
AT gangjun challengesintheethicsreviewprocessofclinicalscientificresearchprojectsinchina