Cargando…

Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis

OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costantino, Claudio, Mazzucco, Walter, Marotta, Claudia, Saporito, Laura, Bono, Stefania, Fiorino, Giusy Russo, Graziano, Giorgio, Maniglia, Marialuisa, Marchese, Valentina, Napoli, Giuseppe, Palmeri, Sara, Provenzano, Sandro, Raia, Daniele Domenico, Santangelo, Omar Enzo, Ventura, Gianmarco, Colaceci, Sofia, Giusti, Angela, Casuccio, Alessandra, Restivo, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860950
_version_ 1783466382905573376
author Costantino, Claudio
Mazzucco, Walter
Marotta, Claudia
Saporito, Laura
Bono, Stefania
Fiorino, Giusy Russo
Graziano, Giorgio
Maniglia, Marialuisa
Marchese, Valentina
Napoli, Giuseppe
Palmeri, Sara
Provenzano, Sandro
Raia, Daniele Domenico
Santangelo, Omar Enzo
Ventura, Gianmarco
Colaceci, Sofia
Giusti, Angela
Casuccio, Alessandra
Restivo, Vincenzo
author_facet Costantino, Claudio
Mazzucco, Walter
Marotta, Claudia
Saporito, Laura
Bono, Stefania
Fiorino, Giusy Russo
Graziano, Giorgio
Maniglia, Marialuisa
Marchese, Valentina
Napoli, Giuseppe
Palmeri, Sara
Provenzano, Sandro
Raia, Daniele Domenico
Santangelo, Omar Enzo
Ventura, Gianmarco
Colaceci, Sofia
Giusti, Angela
Casuccio, Alessandra
Restivo, Vincenzo
author_sort Costantino, Claudio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and to minimize possible biases. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study through SWOT analysis, which is a multidimensional method based on evaluation of Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T) of the research project. The contents of the SWOT forms underwent categorical, inductive, and deductive data analysis using the long table analysis method. RESULTS: The full availability of an updated address and phone number list was the main organizational aspect to be addressed. Socio-cultural context played a major role for understanding the questions and for acceptability of the topics. In some cases, a family member was a facilitating element, while in others, the family member hindered the interviews. Active involvement of general practitioners was considered essential for success of the interviews. CONCLUSIONS: When performing a cross-sectional survey, organizational aspects and active involvement of general practitioners are crucial in the enrolment phase, regardless of the socio-cultural context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6833421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68334212019-11-13 Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis Costantino, Claudio Mazzucco, Walter Marotta, Claudia Saporito, Laura Bono, Stefania Fiorino, Giusy Russo Graziano, Giorgio Maniglia, Marialuisa Marchese, Valentina Napoli, Giuseppe Palmeri, Sara Provenzano, Sandro Raia, Daniele Domenico Santangelo, Omar Enzo Ventura, Gianmarco Colaceci, Sofia Giusti, Angela Casuccio, Alessandra Restivo, Vincenzo J Int Med Res Pre-Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and to minimize possible biases. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study through SWOT analysis, which is a multidimensional method based on evaluation of Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T) of the research project. The contents of the SWOT forms underwent categorical, inductive, and deductive data analysis using the long table analysis method. RESULTS: The full availability of an updated address and phone number list was the main organizational aspect to be addressed. Socio-cultural context played a major role for understanding the questions and for acceptability of the topics. In some cases, a family member was a facilitating element, while in others, the family member hindered the interviews. Active involvement of general practitioners was considered essential for success of the interviews. CONCLUSIONS: When performing a cross-sectional survey, organizational aspects and active involvement of general practitioners are crucial in the enrolment phase, regardless of the socio-cultural context. SAGE Publications 2019-09-11 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6833421/ /pubmed/31510892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860950 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Pre-Clinical Research Reports
Costantino, Claudio
Mazzucco, Walter
Marotta, Claudia
Saporito, Laura
Bono, Stefania
Fiorino, Giusy Russo
Graziano, Giorgio
Maniglia, Marialuisa
Marchese, Valentina
Napoli, Giuseppe
Palmeri, Sara
Provenzano, Sandro
Raia, Daniele Domenico
Santangelo, Omar Enzo
Ventura, Gianmarco
Colaceci, Sofia
Giusti, Angela
Casuccio, Alessandra
Restivo, Vincenzo
Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
title Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
title_full Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
title_fullStr Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
title_full_unstemmed Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
title_short Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
title_sort methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in sicily (italy): a swot analysis
topic Pre-Clinical Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860950
work_keys_str_mv AT costantinoclaudio methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT mazzuccowalter methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT marottaclaudia methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT saporitolaura methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT bonostefania methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT fiorinogiusyrusso methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT grazianogiorgio methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT manigliamarialuisa methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT marchesevalentina methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT napoligiuseppe methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT palmerisara methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT provenzanosandro methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT raiadanieledomenico methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT santangeloomarenzo methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT venturagianmarco methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT colacecisofia methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT giustiangela methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT casuccioalessandra methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis
AT restivovincenzo methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis