Cargando…
Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis
OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860950 |
_version_ | 1783466382905573376 |
---|---|
author | Costantino, Claudio Mazzucco, Walter Marotta, Claudia Saporito, Laura Bono, Stefania Fiorino, Giusy Russo Graziano, Giorgio Maniglia, Marialuisa Marchese, Valentina Napoli, Giuseppe Palmeri, Sara Provenzano, Sandro Raia, Daniele Domenico Santangelo, Omar Enzo Ventura, Gianmarco Colaceci, Sofia Giusti, Angela Casuccio, Alessandra Restivo, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Costantino, Claudio Mazzucco, Walter Marotta, Claudia Saporito, Laura Bono, Stefania Fiorino, Giusy Russo Graziano, Giorgio Maniglia, Marialuisa Marchese, Valentina Napoli, Giuseppe Palmeri, Sara Provenzano, Sandro Raia, Daniele Domenico Santangelo, Omar Enzo Ventura, Gianmarco Colaceci, Sofia Giusti, Angela Casuccio, Alessandra Restivo, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Costantino, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and to minimize possible biases. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study through SWOT analysis, which is a multidimensional method based on evaluation of Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T) of the research project. The contents of the SWOT forms underwent categorical, inductive, and deductive data analysis using the long table analysis method. RESULTS: The full availability of an updated address and phone number list was the main organizational aspect to be addressed. Socio-cultural context played a major role for understanding the questions and for acceptability of the topics. In some cases, a family member was a facilitating element, while in others, the family member hindered the interviews. Active involvement of general practitioners was considered essential for success of the interviews. CONCLUSIONS: When performing a cross-sectional survey, organizational aspects and active involvement of general practitioners are crucial in the enrolment phase, regardless of the socio-cultural context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6833421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68334212019-11-13 Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis Costantino, Claudio Mazzucco, Walter Marotta, Claudia Saporito, Laura Bono, Stefania Fiorino, Giusy Russo Graziano, Giorgio Maniglia, Marialuisa Marchese, Valentina Napoli, Giuseppe Palmeri, Sara Provenzano, Sandro Raia, Daniele Domenico Santangelo, Omar Enzo Ventura, Gianmarco Colaceci, Sofia Giusti, Angela Casuccio, Alessandra Restivo, Vincenzo J Int Med Res Pre-Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and to minimize possible biases. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study through SWOT analysis, which is a multidimensional method based on evaluation of Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T) of the research project. The contents of the SWOT forms underwent categorical, inductive, and deductive data analysis using the long table analysis method. RESULTS: The full availability of an updated address and phone number list was the main organizational aspect to be addressed. Socio-cultural context played a major role for understanding the questions and for acceptability of the topics. In some cases, a family member was a facilitating element, while in others, the family member hindered the interviews. Active involvement of general practitioners was considered essential for success of the interviews. CONCLUSIONS: When performing a cross-sectional survey, organizational aspects and active involvement of general practitioners are crucial in the enrolment phase, regardless of the socio-cultural context. SAGE Publications 2019-09-11 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6833421/ /pubmed/31510892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860950 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Pre-Clinical Research Reports Costantino, Claudio Mazzucco, Walter Marotta, Claudia Saporito, Laura Bono, Stefania Fiorino, Giusy Russo Graziano, Giorgio Maniglia, Marialuisa Marchese, Valentina Napoli, Giuseppe Palmeri, Sara Provenzano, Sandro Raia, Daniele Domenico Santangelo, Omar Enzo Ventura, Gianmarco Colaceci, Sofia Giusti, Angela Casuccio, Alessandra Restivo, Vincenzo Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis |
title | Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis |
title_full | Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis |
title_fullStr | Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis |
title_short | Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis |
title_sort | methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in sicily (italy): a swot analysis |
topic | Pre-Clinical Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860950 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costantinoclaudio methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT mazzuccowalter methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT marottaclaudia methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT saporitolaura methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT bonostefania methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT fiorinogiusyrusso methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT grazianogiorgio methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT manigliamarialuisa methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT marchesevalentina methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT napoligiuseppe methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT palmerisara methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT provenzanosandro methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT raiadanieledomenico methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT santangeloomarenzo methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT venturagianmarco methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT colacecisofia methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT giustiangela methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT casuccioalessandra methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis AT restivovincenzo methodologicalissuesinacrosssectionalsurveyoncervicalcancerscreeningusingtelephoneinterviewsinsicilyitalyaswotanalysis |