Cargando…

Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is one of the most challenging malocclusions to treat. In around 40% of Class III patients, maxillary retrognathia is the main cause of the problem and in most patients, orthopedic/surgical treatments includes some type of maxillary protraction. OBJECTIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fakharian, Mehrnaz, Bardideh, Erfan, Abtahi, Mostafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.052-059.oar
_version_ 1783466402704785408
author Fakharian, Mehrnaz
Bardideh, Erfan
Abtahi, Mostafa
author_facet Fakharian, Mehrnaz
Bardideh, Erfan
Abtahi, Mostafa
author_sort Fakharian, Mehrnaz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is one of the most challenging malocclusions to treat. In around 40% of Class III patients, maxillary retrognathia is the main cause of the problem and in most patients, orthopedic/surgical treatments includes some type of maxillary protraction. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case report was to describe a treatment method for a patient with maxillary retrognathia and Class III skeletal discrepancy using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage with intermaxillary elastics. CASE REPORT: A 13-year-old boy with maxillary retrognathia and mandibular prognathism was treated using bilateral miniplates. Two miniplates were inserted in the mandibular canine area and two other miniplates were placed in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla. Class III intermaxillary elastics were used between the miniplates. RESULTS: After eight months of orthopedic therapy, ANB angle increased by 4.1 degrees and ideal overjet and overbite were achieved. Mandibular plane angle was increased by 2.1 degrees and the palatal plane was rotated counterclockwise by 4.8 degrees. CONCLUSION: This case showed that the skeletal anchorage treatment method may be a viable option for treating patients with Class III skeletal malocclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6833933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68339332019-11-13 Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report Fakharian, Mehrnaz Bardideh, Erfan Abtahi, Mostafa Dental Press J Orthod Original Article INTRODUCTION: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is one of the most challenging malocclusions to treat. In around 40% of Class III patients, maxillary retrognathia is the main cause of the problem and in most patients, orthopedic/surgical treatments includes some type of maxillary protraction. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case report was to describe a treatment method for a patient with maxillary retrognathia and Class III skeletal discrepancy using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage with intermaxillary elastics. CASE REPORT: A 13-year-old boy with maxillary retrognathia and mandibular prognathism was treated using bilateral miniplates. Two miniplates were inserted in the mandibular canine area and two other miniplates were placed in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla. Class III intermaxillary elastics were used between the miniplates. RESULTS: After eight months of orthopedic therapy, ANB angle increased by 4.1 degrees and ideal overjet and overbite were achieved. Mandibular plane angle was increased by 2.1 degrees and the palatal plane was rotated counterclockwise by 4.8 degrees. CONCLUSION: This case showed that the skeletal anchorage treatment method may be a viable option for treating patients with Class III skeletal malocclusion. Dental Press International 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6833933/ /pubmed/31721947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.052-059.oar Text en © 2019 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Fakharian, Mehrnaz
Bardideh, Erfan
Abtahi, Mostafa
Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
title Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
title_full Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
title_fullStr Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
title_short Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
title_sort skeletal class iii malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6833933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.052-059.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT fakharianmehrnaz skeletalclassiiimalocclusiontreatmentusingmandibularandmaxillaryskeletalanchorageandintermaxillaryelasticsacasereport
AT bardideherfan skeletalclassiiimalocclusiontreatmentusingmandibularandmaxillaryskeletalanchorageandintermaxillaryelasticsacasereport
AT abtahimostafa skeletalclassiiimalocclusiontreatmentusingmandibularandmaxillaryskeletalanchorageandintermaxillaryelasticsacasereport