Cargando…
A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes using a new grading of postoperative epidural hematoma (EH) or epidural scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Postoperative EH or epidural scar formation after cervical laminoplasty (LP) or posterior...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0015 |
_version_ | 1783466488679628800 |
---|---|
author | Takeuchi, Kazunari Yokoyama, Toru Wada, Kan-ichiro Kumagai, Gentaro Kudo, Hitoshi Asari, Toru Sasaki, Eiji Fujita, Taku Ishibashi, Yasuyuki |
author_facet | Takeuchi, Kazunari Yokoyama, Toru Wada, Kan-ichiro Kumagai, Gentaro Kudo, Hitoshi Asari, Toru Sasaki, Eiji Fujita, Taku Ishibashi, Yasuyuki |
author_sort | Takeuchi, Kazunari |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes using a new grading of postoperative epidural hematoma (EH) or epidural scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Postoperative EH or epidural scar formation after cervical laminoplasty (LP) or posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) were graded into Grades 1-5 by magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours, 2 weeks, 6 months, and one year after surgery. The patients were divided into the Mild group (Grades 1-3) and the Severe group (Grades 4, 5). Perioperative factors were compared between the two groups at 24 hours after surgery. Distribution of EH or scar formation was investigated according to two surgeries. The recovery rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the improvements of neck disability index (NDI) were compared between the two groups at one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the postoperative factors, posterior shift of the cervical spinal cord at C4 and C7 significantly differed between the two groups. Patients in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery (17%) increased to 41% at 2 weeks and subsequently decreased to 16% at 6 months after LP. After PDF, 3% in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery increased to 15% at 2 weeks and then decreased to 3% at 6 months postoperatively. Only one (3%) patient remained in the Severe group at 1 year after PDF. The recovery rate of JOA score (47.5%) of the patients in the Mild group showed trend larger than that of the Severe group (34.7%) after LP. Preoperative NDI (15.6 points) significantly improved postoperatively to 12.1 points in only the Mild group after LP. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of distribution of EH or scar formation did not differ between the two surgical methods. The severity of postoperative scar formation related to surgical outcomes after LP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6834457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68344572019-11-25 A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery Takeuchi, Kazunari Yokoyama, Toru Wada, Kan-ichiro Kumagai, Gentaro Kudo, Hitoshi Asari, Toru Sasaki, Eiji Fujita, Taku Ishibashi, Yasuyuki Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes using a new grading of postoperative epidural hematoma (EH) or epidural scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Postoperative EH or epidural scar formation after cervical laminoplasty (LP) or posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) were graded into Grades 1-5 by magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours, 2 weeks, 6 months, and one year after surgery. The patients were divided into the Mild group (Grades 1-3) and the Severe group (Grades 4, 5). Perioperative factors were compared between the two groups at 24 hours after surgery. Distribution of EH or scar formation was investigated according to two surgeries. The recovery rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the improvements of neck disability index (NDI) were compared between the two groups at one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the postoperative factors, posterior shift of the cervical spinal cord at C4 and C7 significantly differed between the two groups. Patients in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery (17%) increased to 41% at 2 weeks and subsequently decreased to 16% at 6 months after LP. After PDF, 3% in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery increased to 15% at 2 weeks and then decreased to 3% at 6 months postoperatively. Only one (3%) patient remained in the Severe group at 1 year after PDF. The recovery rate of JOA score (47.5%) of the patients in the Mild group showed trend larger than that of the Severe group (34.7%) after LP. Preoperative NDI (15.6 points) significantly improved postoperatively to 12.1 points in only the Mild group after LP. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of distribution of EH or scar formation did not differ between the two surgical methods. The severity of postoperative scar formation related to surgical outcomes after LP. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6834457/ /pubmed/31768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0015 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Takeuchi, Kazunari Yokoyama, Toru Wada, Kan-ichiro Kumagai, Gentaro Kudo, Hitoshi Asari, Toru Sasaki, Eiji Fujita, Taku Ishibashi, Yasuyuki A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery |
title | A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery |
title_full | A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery |
title_fullStr | A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery |
title_short | A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery |
title_sort | new grading of epidural hematoma or scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery: evaluation of perioperative related factors, distributions, and clinical outcomes after surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takeuchikazunari anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT yokoyamatoru anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT wadakanichiro anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT kumagaigentaro anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT kudohitoshi anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT asaritoru anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT sasakieiji anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT fujitataku anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT ishibashiyasuyuki anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT takeuchikazunari newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT yokoyamatoru newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT wadakanichiro newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT kumagaigentaro newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT kudohitoshi newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT asaritoru newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT sasakieiji newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT fujitataku newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery AT ishibashiyasuyuki newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery |