Cargando…

A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes using a new grading of postoperative epidural hematoma (EH) or epidural scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Postoperative EH or epidural scar formation after cervical laminoplasty (LP) or posterior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeuchi, Kazunari, Yokoyama, Toru, Wada, Kan-ichiro, Kumagai, Gentaro, Kudo, Hitoshi, Asari, Toru, Sasaki, Eiji, Fujita, Taku, Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768447
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0015
_version_ 1783466488679628800
author Takeuchi, Kazunari
Yokoyama, Toru
Wada, Kan-ichiro
Kumagai, Gentaro
Kudo, Hitoshi
Asari, Toru
Sasaki, Eiji
Fujita, Taku
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
author_facet Takeuchi, Kazunari
Yokoyama, Toru
Wada, Kan-ichiro
Kumagai, Gentaro
Kudo, Hitoshi
Asari, Toru
Sasaki, Eiji
Fujita, Taku
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
author_sort Takeuchi, Kazunari
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes using a new grading of postoperative epidural hematoma (EH) or epidural scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Postoperative EH or epidural scar formation after cervical laminoplasty (LP) or posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) were graded into Grades 1-5 by magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours, 2 weeks, 6 months, and one year after surgery. The patients were divided into the Mild group (Grades 1-3) and the Severe group (Grades 4, 5). Perioperative factors were compared between the two groups at 24 hours after surgery. Distribution of EH or scar formation was investigated according to two surgeries. The recovery rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the improvements of neck disability index (NDI) were compared between the two groups at one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the postoperative factors, posterior shift of the cervical spinal cord at C4 and C7 significantly differed between the two groups. Patients in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery (17%) increased to 41% at 2 weeks and subsequently decreased to 16% at 6 months after LP. After PDF, 3% in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery increased to 15% at 2 weeks and then decreased to 3% at 6 months postoperatively. Only one (3%) patient remained in the Severe group at 1 year after PDF. The recovery rate of JOA score (47.5%) of the patients in the Mild group showed trend larger than that of the Severe group (34.7%) after LP. Preoperative NDI (15.6 points) significantly improved postoperatively to 12.1 points in only the Mild group after LP. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of distribution of EH or scar formation did not differ between the two surgical methods. The severity of postoperative scar formation related to surgical outcomes after LP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6834457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68344572019-11-25 A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery Takeuchi, Kazunari Yokoyama, Toru Wada, Kan-ichiro Kumagai, Gentaro Kudo, Hitoshi Asari, Toru Sasaki, Eiji Fujita, Taku Ishibashi, Yasuyuki Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes using a new grading of postoperative epidural hematoma (EH) or epidural scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Postoperative EH or epidural scar formation after cervical laminoplasty (LP) or posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) were graded into Grades 1-5 by magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours, 2 weeks, 6 months, and one year after surgery. The patients were divided into the Mild group (Grades 1-3) and the Severe group (Grades 4, 5). Perioperative factors were compared between the two groups at 24 hours after surgery. Distribution of EH or scar formation was investigated according to two surgeries. The recovery rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the improvements of neck disability index (NDI) were compared between the two groups at one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the postoperative factors, posterior shift of the cervical spinal cord at C4 and C7 significantly differed between the two groups. Patients in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery (17%) increased to 41% at 2 weeks and subsequently decreased to 16% at 6 months after LP. After PDF, 3% in the Severe group at 24 hours after surgery increased to 15% at 2 weeks and then decreased to 3% at 6 months postoperatively. Only one (3%) patient remained in the Severe group at 1 year after PDF. The recovery rate of JOA score (47.5%) of the patients in the Mild group showed trend larger than that of the Severe group (34.7%) after LP. Preoperative NDI (15.6 points) significantly improved postoperatively to 12.1 points in only the Mild group after LP. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of distribution of EH or scar formation did not differ between the two surgical methods. The severity of postoperative scar formation related to surgical outcomes after LP. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6834457/ /pubmed/31768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0015 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Takeuchi, Kazunari
Yokoyama, Toru
Wada, Kan-ichiro
Kumagai, Gentaro
Kudo, Hitoshi
Asari, Toru
Sasaki, Eiji
Fujita, Taku
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
title A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
title_full A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
title_fullStr A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
title_short A New Grading of Epidural Hematoma or Scar Formation after Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Evaluation of Perioperative Related Factors, Distributions, and Clinical Outcomes after Surgery
title_sort new grading of epidural hematoma or scar formation after posterior cervical spine surgery: evaluation of perioperative related factors, distributions, and clinical outcomes after surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768447
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0015
work_keys_str_mv AT takeuchikazunari anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT yokoyamatoru anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT wadakanichiro anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT kumagaigentaro anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT kudohitoshi anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT asaritoru anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT sasakieiji anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT fujitataku anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT ishibashiyasuyuki anewgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT takeuchikazunari newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT yokoyamatoru newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT wadakanichiro newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT kumagaigentaro newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT kudohitoshi newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT asaritoru newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT sasakieiji newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT fujitataku newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery
AT ishibashiyasuyuki newgradingofepiduralhematomaorscarformationafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryevaluationofperioperativerelatedfactorsdistributionsandclinicaloutcomesaftersurgery