Cargando…

Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types

Literature on familial risk of carcinomas in situ (CISs) is limited because many cancer registries do not collect information on CIS. In Sweden CISs are collected, and we used these data to analyze familial relative risks (RRs) for concordant (CIS-CIS) types of anogenital (cervical, other female and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Luyao, Hemminki, Otto, Zheng, Guoqiao, Försti, Asta, Sundquist, Kristina, Sundquist, Jan, Hemminki, Kari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51651-6
_version_ 1783466513967087616
author Zhang, Luyao
Hemminki, Otto
Zheng, Guoqiao
Försti, Asta
Sundquist, Kristina
Sundquist, Jan
Hemminki, Kari
author_facet Zhang, Luyao
Hemminki, Otto
Zheng, Guoqiao
Försti, Asta
Sundquist, Kristina
Sundquist, Jan
Hemminki, Kari
author_sort Zhang, Luyao
collection PubMed
description Literature on familial risk of carcinomas in situ (CISs) is limited because many cancer registries do not collect information on CIS. In Sweden CISs are collected, and we used these data to analyze familial relative risks (RRs) for concordant (CIS-CIS) types of anogenital (cervical, other female and male genital and anal) and skin squamous cell CIS; additionally RRs were assessed between CIS types and between CIS and invasive forms. RRs were calculated for the offspring generations when family members were diagnosed CIS. Case numbers for CIS ranged from 330 in anal to 177,285 in cervical CIS. Significant concordant CIS-CIS RRs were 2.74 for female genital, 1.77 for cervical and 2.29 for SCC skin CISs. The CIS forms associated also with each other, except for cervical and skin CIS types. RRs for concordant CIS-invasive cancer associations were lower than CIS-CIS associations. Cervical CIS associated with non-Hodgkin CIS which may suggest immune dysfunction as a contributing factors. The results for anogenital CIS types suggest that life style related human papilloma virus infections contributed to the observed familial associations. Lower risks for CIS-invasive cancer than CIS-CIS suggest that CIS and invasive cancers share only partially risk factors that underlie familial clustering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6834624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68346242019-11-14 Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types Zhang, Luyao Hemminki, Otto Zheng, Guoqiao Försti, Asta Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Hemminki, Kari Sci Rep Article Literature on familial risk of carcinomas in situ (CISs) is limited because many cancer registries do not collect information on CIS. In Sweden CISs are collected, and we used these data to analyze familial relative risks (RRs) for concordant (CIS-CIS) types of anogenital (cervical, other female and male genital and anal) and skin squamous cell CIS; additionally RRs were assessed between CIS types and between CIS and invasive forms. RRs were calculated for the offspring generations when family members were diagnosed CIS. Case numbers for CIS ranged from 330 in anal to 177,285 in cervical CIS. Significant concordant CIS-CIS RRs were 2.74 for female genital, 1.77 for cervical and 2.29 for SCC skin CISs. The CIS forms associated also with each other, except for cervical and skin CIS types. RRs for concordant CIS-invasive cancer associations were lower than CIS-CIS associations. Cervical CIS associated with non-Hodgkin CIS which may suggest immune dysfunction as a contributing factors. The results for anogenital CIS types suggest that life style related human papilloma virus infections contributed to the observed familial associations. Lower risks for CIS-invasive cancer than CIS-CIS suggest that CIS and invasive cancers share only partially risk factors that underlie familial clustering. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6834624/ /pubmed/31695117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51651-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Luyao
Hemminki, Otto
Zheng, Guoqiao
Försti, Asta
Sundquist, Kristina
Sundquist, Jan
Hemminki, Kari
Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
title Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
title_full Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
title_fullStr Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
title_short Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
title_sort comparison of familial clustering of anogenital and skin cancers between in situ and invasive types
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51651-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangluyao comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes
AT hemminkiotto comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes
AT zhengguoqiao comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes
AT forstiasta comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes
AT sundquistkristina comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes
AT sundquistjan comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes
AT hemminkikari comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes