Cargando…
Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types
Literature on familial risk of carcinomas in situ (CISs) is limited because many cancer registries do not collect information on CIS. In Sweden CISs are collected, and we used these data to analyze familial relative risks (RRs) for concordant (CIS-CIS) types of anogenital (cervical, other female and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51651-6 |
_version_ | 1783466513967087616 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Luyao Hemminki, Otto Zheng, Guoqiao Försti, Asta Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Hemminki, Kari |
author_facet | Zhang, Luyao Hemminki, Otto Zheng, Guoqiao Försti, Asta Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Hemminki, Kari |
author_sort | Zhang, Luyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Literature on familial risk of carcinomas in situ (CISs) is limited because many cancer registries do not collect information on CIS. In Sweden CISs are collected, and we used these data to analyze familial relative risks (RRs) for concordant (CIS-CIS) types of anogenital (cervical, other female and male genital and anal) and skin squamous cell CIS; additionally RRs were assessed between CIS types and between CIS and invasive forms. RRs were calculated for the offspring generations when family members were diagnosed CIS. Case numbers for CIS ranged from 330 in anal to 177,285 in cervical CIS. Significant concordant CIS-CIS RRs were 2.74 for female genital, 1.77 for cervical and 2.29 for SCC skin CISs. The CIS forms associated also with each other, except for cervical and skin CIS types. RRs for concordant CIS-invasive cancer associations were lower than CIS-CIS associations. Cervical CIS associated with non-Hodgkin CIS which may suggest immune dysfunction as a contributing factors. The results for anogenital CIS types suggest that life style related human papilloma virus infections contributed to the observed familial associations. Lower risks for CIS-invasive cancer than CIS-CIS suggest that CIS and invasive cancers share only partially risk factors that underlie familial clustering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6834624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68346242019-11-14 Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types Zhang, Luyao Hemminki, Otto Zheng, Guoqiao Försti, Asta Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Hemminki, Kari Sci Rep Article Literature on familial risk of carcinomas in situ (CISs) is limited because many cancer registries do not collect information on CIS. In Sweden CISs are collected, and we used these data to analyze familial relative risks (RRs) for concordant (CIS-CIS) types of anogenital (cervical, other female and male genital and anal) and skin squamous cell CIS; additionally RRs were assessed between CIS types and between CIS and invasive forms. RRs were calculated for the offspring generations when family members were diagnosed CIS. Case numbers for CIS ranged from 330 in anal to 177,285 in cervical CIS. Significant concordant CIS-CIS RRs were 2.74 for female genital, 1.77 for cervical and 2.29 for SCC skin CISs. The CIS forms associated also with each other, except for cervical and skin CIS types. RRs for concordant CIS-invasive cancer associations were lower than CIS-CIS associations. Cervical CIS associated with non-Hodgkin CIS which may suggest immune dysfunction as a contributing factors. The results for anogenital CIS types suggest that life style related human papilloma virus infections contributed to the observed familial associations. Lower risks for CIS-invasive cancer than CIS-CIS suggest that CIS and invasive cancers share only partially risk factors that underlie familial clustering. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6834624/ /pubmed/31695117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51651-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Luyao Hemminki, Otto Zheng, Guoqiao Försti, Asta Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Hemminki, Kari Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types |
title | Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types |
title_full | Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types |
title_short | Comparison of Familial Clustering of Anogenital and Skin Cancers Between In Situ and Invasive Types |
title_sort | comparison of familial clustering of anogenital and skin cancers between in situ and invasive types |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51651-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangluyao comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes AT hemminkiotto comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes AT zhengguoqiao comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes AT forstiasta comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes AT sundquistkristina comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes AT sundquistjan comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes AT hemminkikari comparisonoffamilialclusteringofanogenitalandskincancersbetweeninsituandinvasivetypes |