Cargando…

An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task

An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parris, Benjamin A., Wadsley, Michael G., Hasshim, Nabil, Benattayallah, Abdelmalek, Augustinova, Maria, Ferrand, Ludovic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736827
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
_version_ 1783466549322973184
author Parris, Benjamin A.
Wadsley, Michael G.
Hasshim, Nabil
Benattayallah, Abdelmalek
Augustinova, Maria
Ferrand, Ludovic
author_facet Parris, Benjamin A.
Wadsley, Michael G.
Hasshim, Nabil
Benattayallah, Abdelmalek
Augustinova, Maria
Ferrand, Ludovic
author_sort Parris, Benjamin A.
collection PubMed
description An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the Stroop task the present study provides evidence for specialized functions of regions of the frontoparietal network in processing response and semantic conflict during Stroop task performance. Specifically, we used trial types and orthogonal contrasts thought to better independently measure response and semantic conflict and we presented the trial types in pure blocks to maximize response conflict and therefore better distinguish between the conflict types. Our data indicate that the left inferior PFC plays an important role in the processing of both response and semantic (or stimulus) conflict, whilst regions of the left parietal cortex (BA40) play an accompanying role in response, but not semantic, conflict processing. Moreover, our study reports a role for the right mediodorsal thalamus in processing semantic, but not response, conflict. In none of our comparisons did we observe activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a finding we ascribe to the use of blocked trial type presentation and one that has implications for theories of ACC function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6834775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68347752019-11-15 An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task Parris, Benjamin A. Wadsley, Michael G. Hasshim, Nabil Benattayallah, Abdelmalek Augustinova, Maria Ferrand, Ludovic Front Psychol Psychology An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the Stroop task the present study provides evidence for specialized functions of regions of the frontoparietal network in processing response and semantic conflict during Stroop task performance. Specifically, we used trial types and orthogonal contrasts thought to better independently measure response and semantic conflict and we presented the trial types in pure blocks to maximize response conflict and therefore better distinguish between the conflict types. Our data indicate that the left inferior PFC plays an important role in the processing of both response and semantic (or stimulus) conflict, whilst regions of the left parietal cortex (BA40) play an accompanying role in response, but not semantic, conflict processing. Moreover, our study reports a role for the right mediodorsal thalamus in processing semantic, but not response, conflict. In none of our comparisons did we observe activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a finding we ascribe to the use of blocked trial type presentation and one that has implications for theories of ACC function. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6834775/ /pubmed/31736827 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426 Text en Copyright © 2019 Parris, Wadsley, Hasshim, Benattayallah, Augustinova and Ferrand. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Parris, Benjamin A.
Wadsley, Michael G.
Hasshim, Nabil
Benattayallah, Abdelmalek
Augustinova, Maria
Ferrand, Ludovic
An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
title An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
title_full An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
title_fullStr An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
title_full_unstemmed An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
title_short An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
title_sort fmri study of response and semantic conflict in the stroop task
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736827
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
work_keys_str_mv AT parrisbenjamina anfmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT wadsleymichaelg anfmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT hasshimnabil anfmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT benattayallahabdelmalek anfmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT augustinovamaria anfmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT ferrandludovic anfmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT parrisbenjamina fmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT wadsleymichaelg fmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT hasshimnabil fmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT benattayallahabdelmalek fmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT augustinovamaria fmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask
AT ferrandludovic fmristudyofresponseandsemanticconflictinthestrooptask