Cargando…
Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of different pulse numbers of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the motor cortex on cortical excitability in healthy participants. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received 600 and 1200 pulses of 5‐Hz rTMS on separat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13248 |
_version_ | 1783466562945024000 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Zhi‐Ming Xuan, Chun‐Yu Li, Xin Dou, Zu‐Lin Lan, Yu‐Jie Wen, Hong‐Mei |
author_facet | Tang, Zhi‐Ming Xuan, Chun‐Yu Li, Xin Dou, Zu‐Lin Lan, Yu‐Jie Wen, Hong‐Mei |
author_sort | Tang, Zhi‐Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of different pulse numbers of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the motor cortex on cortical excitability in healthy participants. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received 600 and 1200 pulses of 5‐Hz rTMS on separate days in a random order. Stimulation (duration, 2 seconds and interval, 1 seconds) was delivered over the left primary motor cortex for the hand, at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT). The rMT and motor evoked potential (MEP) were measured before stimulation, and at 0 and 30 minutes after rTMS. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two conditions for MEP (P = .919) or rMT (P = .266). Compared with baseline, MEP was increased significantly at 0 (P < .001) and 30 minutes (P < .001) after stimulation. After stimulation, rMT was decreased at 0 minute for the 600 and 1200 pulse conditions (P < .001), but had recovered by 30 minutes (P = .073). CONCLUSION: Subthreshold 5‐Hz rTMS increased motor cortex excitability in healthy humans. However, the number of pulses may exhibit a ceiling effect in that beyond a certain point, that is, increasing the number of pulses may exhibit no further increase in cortical excitability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6834918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68349182019-11-12 Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design Tang, Zhi‐Ming Xuan, Chun‐Yu Li, Xin Dou, Zu‐Lin Lan, Yu‐Jie Wen, Hong‐Mei CNS Neurosci Ther Original Articles AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of different pulse numbers of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the motor cortex on cortical excitability in healthy participants. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received 600 and 1200 pulses of 5‐Hz rTMS on separate days in a random order. Stimulation (duration, 2 seconds and interval, 1 seconds) was delivered over the left primary motor cortex for the hand, at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT). The rMT and motor evoked potential (MEP) were measured before stimulation, and at 0 and 30 minutes after rTMS. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two conditions for MEP (P = .919) or rMT (P = .266). Compared with baseline, MEP was increased significantly at 0 (P < .001) and 30 minutes (P < .001) after stimulation. After stimulation, rMT was decreased at 0 minute for the 600 and 1200 pulse conditions (P < .001), but had recovered by 30 minutes (P = .073). CONCLUSION: Subthreshold 5‐Hz rTMS increased motor cortex excitability in healthy humans. However, the number of pulses may exhibit a ceiling effect in that beyond a certain point, that is, increasing the number of pulses may exhibit no further increase in cortical excitability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6834918/ /pubmed/31696644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13248 Text en © 2019 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tang, Zhi‐Ming Xuan, Chun‐Yu Li, Xin Dou, Zu‐Lin Lan, Yu‐Jie Wen, Hong‐Mei Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
title | Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
title_full | Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
title_fullStr | Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
title_short | Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
title_sort | effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangzhiming effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign AT xuanchunyu effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign AT lixin effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign AT douzulin effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign AT lanyujie effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign AT wenhongmei effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign |