Cargando…

Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design

AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of different pulse numbers of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the motor cortex on cortical excitability in healthy participants. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received 600 and 1200 pulses of 5‐Hz rTMS on separat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Zhi‐Ming, Xuan, Chun‐Yu, Li, Xin, Dou, Zu‐Lin, Lan, Yu‐Jie, Wen, Hong‐Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13248
_version_ 1783466562945024000
author Tang, Zhi‐Ming
Xuan, Chun‐Yu
Li, Xin
Dou, Zu‐Lin
Lan, Yu‐Jie
Wen, Hong‐Mei
author_facet Tang, Zhi‐Ming
Xuan, Chun‐Yu
Li, Xin
Dou, Zu‐Lin
Lan, Yu‐Jie
Wen, Hong‐Mei
author_sort Tang, Zhi‐Ming
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of different pulse numbers of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the motor cortex on cortical excitability in healthy participants. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received 600 and 1200 pulses of 5‐Hz rTMS on separate days in a random order. Stimulation (duration, 2 seconds and interval, 1 seconds) was delivered over the left primary motor cortex for the hand, at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT). The rMT and motor evoked potential (MEP) were measured before stimulation, and at 0 and 30 minutes after rTMS. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two conditions for MEP (P = .919) or rMT (P = .266). Compared with baseline, MEP was increased significantly at 0 (P < .001) and 30 minutes (P < .001) after stimulation. After stimulation, rMT was decreased at 0 minute for the 600 and 1200 pulse conditions (P < .001), but had recovered by 30 minutes (P = .073). CONCLUSION: Subthreshold 5‐Hz rTMS increased motor cortex excitability in healthy humans. However, the number of pulses may exhibit a ceiling effect in that beyond a certain point, that is, increasing the number of pulses may exhibit no further increase in cortical excitability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6834918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68349182019-11-12 Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design Tang, Zhi‐Ming Xuan, Chun‐Yu Li, Xin Dou, Zu‐Lin Lan, Yu‐Jie Wen, Hong‐Mei CNS Neurosci Ther Original Articles AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of different pulse numbers of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the motor cortex on cortical excitability in healthy participants. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received 600 and 1200 pulses of 5‐Hz rTMS on separate days in a random order. Stimulation (duration, 2 seconds and interval, 1 seconds) was delivered over the left primary motor cortex for the hand, at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT). The rMT and motor evoked potential (MEP) were measured before stimulation, and at 0 and 30 minutes after rTMS. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two conditions for MEP (P = .919) or rMT (P = .266). Compared with baseline, MEP was increased significantly at 0 (P < .001) and 30 minutes (P < .001) after stimulation. After stimulation, rMT was decreased at 0 minute for the 600 and 1200 pulse conditions (P < .001), but had recovered by 30 minutes (P = .073). CONCLUSION: Subthreshold 5‐Hz rTMS increased motor cortex excitability in healthy humans. However, the number of pulses may exhibit a ceiling effect in that beyond a certain point, that is, increasing the number of pulses may exhibit no further increase in cortical excitability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6834918/ /pubmed/31696644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13248 Text en © 2019 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tang, Zhi‐Ming
Xuan, Chun‐Yu
Li, Xin
Dou, Zu‐Lin
Lan, Yu‐Jie
Wen, Hong‐Mei
Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
title Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
title_full Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
title_fullStr Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
title_short Effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: Single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
title_sort effect of different pulse numbers of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex excitability: single‐blind, randomized cross‐over design
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13248
work_keys_str_mv AT tangzhiming effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign
AT xuanchunyu effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign
AT lixin effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign
AT douzulin effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign
AT lanyujie effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign
AT wenhongmei effectofdifferentpulsenumbersoftranscranialmagneticstimulationonmotorcortexexcitabilitysingleblindrandomizedcrossoverdesign