Cargando…

Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabarcas, Brandon C., Cvetanovich, Gregory L., Gowd, Anirudh K., Liu, Joseph N., Manderle, Brandon J., Verma, Nikhil N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.002
_version_ 1783466577084022784
author Cabarcas, Brandon C.
Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
Gowd, Anirudh K.
Liu, Joseph N.
Manderle, Brandon J.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_facet Cabarcas, Brandon C.
Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
Gowd, Anirudh K.
Liu, Joseph N.
Manderle, Brandon J.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_sort Cabarcas, Brandon C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves implantation accuracy during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to analyze available techniques and correlation with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that PSI may improve glenoid component position radiographically but without correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Included articles reported use of any preoperative or intraoperative PSI techniques, models, or guides to assist with TSA prosthesis implantation. The primary outcomes were mean deviation from the preoperative plan in version (in degrees), inclination (in degrees), and entry-point offset on the glenoid (in millimeters). RESULTS: Among the included articles, 518 TSA procedures (352 anatomic and 166 reverse) were performed. The mean postoperative errors in both version and inclination angles were 5° or less in 20 articles (90.9%) using PSI. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in version error (P > .999, I(2) = 64.6%), inclination error (P = .702, I(2) = 82.2%), or positional offset (P = .777, I(2) = 85.7%) between PSI and standard instrumentation. No data regarding patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, strength, or glenoid component loosening and longevity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in accuracy between PSI and standard instrumentation. Although PSI may possess the potential to improve TSA techniques, further investigations regarding long-term clinical outcomes, impact on operating room time, and cost-effectiveness are warranted before PSI can be routinely recommended over conventional instrumentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6834995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68349952019-11-08 Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cabarcas, Brandon C. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Gowd, Anirudh K. Liu, Joseph N. Manderle, Brandon J. Verma, Nikhil N. JSES Open Access Article BACKGROUND: There has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves implantation accuracy during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to analyze available techniques and correlation with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that PSI may improve glenoid component position radiographically but without correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Included articles reported use of any preoperative or intraoperative PSI techniques, models, or guides to assist with TSA prosthesis implantation. The primary outcomes were mean deviation from the preoperative plan in version (in degrees), inclination (in degrees), and entry-point offset on the glenoid (in millimeters). RESULTS: Among the included articles, 518 TSA procedures (352 anatomic and 166 reverse) were performed. The mean postoperative errors in both version and inclination angles were 5° or less in 20 articles (90.9%) using PSI. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in version error (P > .999, I(2) = 64.6%), inclination error (P = .702, I(2) = 82.2%), or positional offset (P = .777, I(2) = 85.7%) between PSI and standard instrumentation. No data regarding patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, strength, or glenoid component loosening and longevity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in accuracy between PSI and standard instrumentation. Although PSI may possess the potential to improve TSA techniques, further investigations regarding long-term clinical outcomes, impact on operating room time, and cost-effectiveness are warranted before PSI can be routinely recommended over conventional instrumentation. Elsevier 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6834995/ /pubmed/31709351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cabarcas, Brandon C.
Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
Gowd, Anirudh K.
Liu, Joseph N.
Manderle, Brandon J.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.002
work_keys_str_mv AT cabarcasbrandonc accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cvetanovichgregoryl accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gowdanirudhk accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujosephn accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manderlebrandonj accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vermanikhiln accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis