Cargando…
Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: There has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.002 |
_version_ | 1783466577084022784 |
---|---|
author | Cabarcas, Brandon C. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Gowd, Anirudh K. Liu, Joseph N. Manderle, Brandon J. Verma, Nikhil N. |
author_facet | Cabarcas, Brandon C. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Gowd, Anirudh K. Liu, Joseph N. Manderle, Brandon J. Verma, Nikhil N. |
author_sort | Cabarcas, Brandon C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves implantation accuracy during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to analyze available techniques and correlation with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that PSI may improve glenoid component position radiographically but without correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Included articles reported use of any preoperative or intraoperative PSI techniques, models, or guides to assist with TSA prosthesis implantation. The primary outcomes were mean deviation from the preoperative plan in version (in degrees), inclination (in degrees), and entry-point offset on the glenoid (in millimeters). RESULTS: Among the included articles, 518 TSA procedures (352 anatomic and 166 reverse) were performed. The mean postoperative errors in both version and inclination angles were 5° or less in 20 articles (90.9%) using PSI. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in version error (P > .999, I(2) = 64.6%), inclination error (P = .702, I(2) = 82.2%), or positional offset (P = .777, I(2) = 85.7%) between PSI and standard instrumentation. No data regarding patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, strength, or glenoid component loosening and longevity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in accuracy between PSI and standard instrumentation. Although PSI may possess the potential to improve TSA techniques, further investigations regarding long-term clinical outcomes, impact on operating room time, and cost-effectiveness are warranted before PSI can be routinely recommended over conventional instrumentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6834995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68349952019-11-08 Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cabarcas, Brandon C. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Gowd, Anirudh K. Liu, Joseph N. Manderle, Brandon J. Verma, Nikhil N. JSES Open Access Article BACKGROUND: There has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves implantation accuracy during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to analyze available techniques and correlation with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that PSI may improve glenoid component position radiographically but without correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Included articles reported use of any preoperative or intraoperative PSI techniques, models, or guides to assist with TSA prosthesis implantation. The primary outcomes were mean deviation from the preoperative plan in version (in degrees), inclination (in degrees), and entry-point offset on the glenoid (in millimeters). RESULTS: Among the included articles, 518 TSA procedures (352 anatomic and 166 reverse) were performed. The mean postoperative errors in both version and inclination angles were 5° or less in 20 articles (90.9%) using PSI. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in version error (P > .999, I(2) = 64.6%), inclination error (P = .702, I(2) = 82.2%), or positional offset (P = .777, I(2) = 85.7%) between PSI and standard instrumentation. No data regarding patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, strength, or glenoid component loosening and longevity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in accuracy between PSI and standard instrumentation. Although PSI may possess the potential to improve TSA techniques, further investigations regarding long-term clinical outcomes, impact on operating room time, and cost-effectiveness are warranted before PSI can be routinely recommended over conventional instrumentation. Elsevier 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6834995/ /pubmed/31709351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cabarcas, Brandon C. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Gowd, Anirudh K. Liu, Joseph N. Manderle, Brandon J. Verma, Nikhil N. Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6834995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cabarcasbrandonc accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cvetanovichgregoryl accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gowdanirudhk accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liujosephn accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT manderlebrandonj accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vermanikhiln accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |