Cargando…

Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation

Importance: Traditionally cyclophotocoagulation has been reserved as a treatment of last resort for eyes with advanced stage glaucoma, but increasingly it is offered to eyes with less severe disease. Endoscopic approaches in particular are utilized in increasing numbers of patients despite only a sm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beardsley, Robert, Law, Simon K., Caprioli, Joseph, Coleman, Anne L., Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros, Hubschman, Jean-Pierre, Schwartz, Steven D., Giaconi, JoAnn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31740649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision1040024
_version_ 1783466659316498432
author Beardsley, Robert
Law, Simon K.
Caprioli, Joseph
Coleman, Anne L.
Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
Hubschman, Jean-Pierre
Schwartz, Steven D.
Giaconi, JoAnn A.
author_facet Beardsley, Robert
Law, Simon K.
Caprioli, Joseph
Coleman, Anne L.
Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
Hubschman, Jean-Pierre
Schwartz, Steven D.
Giaconi, JoAnn A.
author_sort Beardsley, Robert
collection PubMed
description Importance: Traditionally cyclophotocoagulation has been reserved as a treatment of last resort for eyes with advanced stage glaucoma, but increasingly it is offered to eyes with less severe disease. Endoscopic approaches in particular are utilized in increasing numbers of patients despite only a small number of publications on its results. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic and transcleral cyclophotocoagulation (ECP and TCP) procedures in eyes with refractory glaucomas. Design, Setting, and Participants: A chart review was performed on consecutive patients who underwent ECP and TCP at a tertiary ophthalmology care center between January 2000 and December 2010. Cases with fewer than 3 months of follow-up or that had concurrent pressure reducing procedures were excluded. The main outcome measures examined were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), additional glaucoma procedure required, and complications. Main Outcomes and Measures: Forty-two eyes (42 patients) that underwent ECP and forty-four eyes (44 patients) that underwent TCP were identified. The TCP group had a statistically higher mean age (71.2 ± 16.7 vs. 58.1 ± 22.9 years, respectively), larger proportion of neovascular glaucoma (40.9% vs. 16.7%), worse initial BCVA (logMAR 2.86 vs. 1.81), and higher preoperative IOP (45.3 vs. 26.6 mmHg) than the ECP group. At 12 months follow-up, the mean IOP difference between groups was not statistically significant, although the change in IOP from baseline to 12 months was greater for the TCP group (p = 0.006). The rates of progression to no light perception (NLP) and phthisis bulbi were significantly higher amongst TCP eyes than ECP eyes (27.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.017, and 20.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.003, respectively). Of these eyes that progressed, a majority had neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Corneal decompensation was the most frequent complication following ECP (11.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with preoperative BCVA of 20/400 or better, overall complication rates (cystoid macular edema, exudative retinal detachment, inflammation, cornea decompensation) were higher after ECP than with TCP. In refractory glaucomas in a real world setting (not a trial), TCP was more frequently used in ischemic eyes. TCP was associated with a higher rate of progression to phthisis bulbi and loss of light perception than ECP. However, ECP was associated with a clinically significant rate of corneal decompensation. These outcomes likely were related to the severity of underlying ocular diseases found in these eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6835382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68353822019-11-14 Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation Beardsley, Robert Law, Simon K. Caprioli, Joseph Coleman, Anne L. Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros Hubschman, Jean-Pierre Schwartz, Steven D. Giaconi, JoAnn A. Vision (Basel) Article Importance: Traditionally cyclophotocoagulation has been reserved as a treatment of last resort for eyes with advanced stage glaucoma, but increasingly it is offered to eyes with less severe disease. Endoscopic approaches in particular are utilized in increasing numbers of patients despite only a small number of publications on its results. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic and transcleral cyclophotocoagulation (ECP and TCP) procedures in eyes with refractory glaucomas. Design, Setting, and Participants: A chart review was performed on consecutive patients who underwent ECP and TCP at a tertiary ophthalmology care center between January 2000 and December 2010. Cases with fewer than 3 months of follow-up or that had concurrent pressure reducing procedures were excluded. The main outcome measures examined were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), additional glaucoma procedure required, and complications. Main Outcomes and Measures: Forty-two eyes (42 patients) that underwent ECP and forty-four eyes (44 patients) that underwent TCP were identified. The TCP group had a statistically higher mean age (71.2 ± 16.7 vs. 58.1 ± 22.9 years, respectively), larger proportion of neovascular glaucoma (40.9% vs. 16.7%), worse initial BCVA (logMAR 2.86 vs. 1.81), and higher preoperative IOP (45.3 vs. 26.6 mmHg) than the ECP group. At 12 months follow-up, the mean IOP difference between groups was not statistically significant, although the change in IOP from baseline to 12 months was greater for the TCP group (p = 0.006). The rates of progression to no light perception (NLP) and phthisis bulbi were significantly higher amongst TCP eyes than ECP eyes (27.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.017, and 20.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.003, respectively). Of these eyes that progressed, a majority had neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Corneal decompensation was the most frequent complication following ECP (11.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with preoperative BCVA of 20/400 or better, overall complication rates (cystoid macular edema, exudative retinal detachment, inflammation, cornea decompensation) were higher after ECP than with TCP. In refractory glaucomas in a real world setting (not a trial), TCP was more frequently used in ischemic eyes. TCP was associated with a higher rate of progression to phthisis bulbi and loss of light perception than ECP. However, ECP was associated with a clinically significant rate of corneal decompensation. These outcomes likely were related to the severity of underlying ocular diseases found in these eyes. MDPI 2017-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6835382/ /pubmed/31740649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision1040024 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beardsley, Robert
Law, Simon K.
Caprioli, Joseph
Coleman, Anne L.
Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
Hubschman, Jean-Pierre
Schwartz, Steven D.
Giaconi, JoAnn A.
Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation
title Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation
title_full Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation
title_fullStr Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation
title_short Comparison of Outcomes between Endoscopic and Transcleral Cyclophotocoagulation
title_sort comparison of outcomes between endoscopic and transcleral cyclophotocoagulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31740649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision1040024
work_keys_str_mv AT beardsleyrobert comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT lawsimonk comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT capriolijoseph comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT colemanannel comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT nourimahdavikouros comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT hubschmanjeanpierre comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT schwartzstevend comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation
AT giaconijoanna comparisonofoutcomesbetweenendoscopicandtranscleralcyclophotocoagulation