Cargando…

Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems

We investigated nozzleless ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES) as means to generate nanofibrous drug delivery systems (DDSs) for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Traditional electrospinning (TES) equipped with a conventional spinneret was used as a reference method. High-molecular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hakkarainen, Enni, Kõrkjas, Arle, Laidmäe, Ivo, Lust, Andres, Semjonov, Kristian, Kogermann, Karin, Nieminen, Heikki J., Salmi, Ari, Korhonen, Ossi, Haeggström, Edward, Heinämäki, Jyrki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100495
_version_ 1783466703302164480
author Hakkarainen, Enni
Kõrkjas, Arle
Laidmäe, Ivo
Lust, Andres
Semjonov, Kristian
Kogermann, Karin
Nieminen, Heikki J.
Salmi, Ari
Korhonen, Ossi
Haeggström, Edward
Heinämäki, Jyrki
author_facet Hakkarainen, Enni
Kõrkjas, Arle
Laidmäe, Ivo
Lust, Andres
Semjonov, Kristian
Kogermann, Karin
Nieminen, Heikki J.
Salmi, Ari
Korhonen, Ossi
Haeggström, Edward
Heinämäki, Jyrki
author_sort Hakkarainen, Enni
collection PubMed
description We investigated nozzleless ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES) as means to generate nanofibrous drug delivery systems (DDSs) for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Traditional electrospinning (TES) equipped with a conventional spinneret was used as a reference method. High-molecular polyethylene oxide (PEO) and chitosan were used as carrier polymers and theophylline anhydrate as a water-soluble model drug. The nanofibers were electrospun with the diluted mixture (7:3) of aqueous acetic acid (90% v/v) and formic acid solution (90% v/v) (with a total solid content of 3% w/v). The fiber diameter and morphology of the nanofibrous DDSs were modulated by varying ultrasonic parameters in the USES process (i.e., frequency, pulse repetition frequency and cycles per pulse). We found that the USES technology produced nanofibers with higher fiber diameter (402 ± 127 nm) than TES (77 ± 21 nm). An increase of a burst count in USES increased the fiber diameter (555 ± 265 nm) and the variation in fiber size. The slight-to-moderate changes in a solid state (crystallinity) were detected when compared the nanofibers generated by TES and USES. In conclusion, USES provides a promising alternative for aqueous-based fabrication of nanofibrous DDSs for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6835569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68355692019-11-25 Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems Hakkarainen, Enni Kõrkjas, Arle Laidmäe, Ivo Lust, Andres Semjonov, Kristian Kogermann, Karin Nieminen, Heikki J. Salmi, Ari Korhonen, Ossi Haeggström, Edward Heinämäki, Jyrki Pharmaceutics Article We investigated nozzleless ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES) as means to generate nanofibrous drug delivery systems (DDSs) for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Traditional electrospinning (TES) equipped with a conventional spinneret was used as a reference method. High-molecular polyethylene oxide (PEO) and chitosan were used as carrier polymers and theophylline anhydrate as a water-soluble model drug. The nanofibers were electrospun with the diluted mixture (7:3) of aqueous acetic acid (90% v/v) and formic acid solution (90% v/v) (with a total solid content of 3% w/v). The fiber diameter and morphology of the nanofibrous DDSs were modulated by varying ultrasonic parameters in the USES process (i.e., frequency, pulse repetition frequency and cycles per pulse). We found that the USES technology produced nanofibers with higher fiber diameter (402 ± 127 nm) than TES (77 ± 21 nm). An increase of a burst count in USES increased the fiber diameter (555 ± 265 nm) and the variation in fiber size. The slight-to-moderate changes in a solid state (crystallinity) were detected when compared the nanofibers generated by TES and USES. In conclusion, USES provides a promising alternative for aqueous-based fabrication of nanofibrous DDSs for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. MDPI 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6835569/ /pubmed/31561640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100495 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hakkarainen, Enni
Kõrkjas, Arle
Laidmäe, Ivo
Lust, Andres
Semjonov, Kristian
Kogermann, Karin
Nieminen, Heikki J.
Salmi, Ari
Korhonen, Ossi
Haeggström, Edward
Heinämäki, Jyrki
Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
title Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
title_full Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
title_fullStr Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
title_short Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
title_sort comparison of traditional and ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning in fabricating nanofibrous drug delivery systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100495
work_keys_str_mv AT hakkarainenenni comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT korkjasarle comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT laidmaeivo comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT lustandres comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT semjonovkristian comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT kogermannkarin comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT nieminenheikkij comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT salmiari comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT korhonenossi comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT haeggstromedward comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems
AT heinamakijyrki comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems