Cargando…
Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems
We investigated nozzleless ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES) as means to generate nanofibrous drug delivery systems (DDSs) for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Traditional electrospinning (TES) equipped with a conventional spinneret was used as a reference method. High-molecular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100495 |
_version_ | 1783466703302164480 |
---|---|
author | Hakkarainen, Enni Kõrkjas, Arle Laidmäe, Ivo Lust, Andres Semjonov, Kristian Kogermann, Karin Nieminen, Heikki J. Salmi, Ari Korhonen, Ossi Haeggström, Edward Heinämäki, Jyrki |
author_facet | Hakkarainen, Enni Kõrkjas, Arle Laidmäe, Ivo Lust, Andres Semjonov, Kristian Kogermann, Karin Nieminen, Heikki J. Salmi, Ari Korhonen, Ossi Haeggström, Edward Heinämäki, Jyrki |
author_sort | Hakkarainen, Enni |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated nozzleless ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES) as means to generate nanofibrous drug delivery systems (DDSs) for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Traditional electrospinning (TES) equipped with a conventional spinneret was used as a reference method. High-molecular polyethylene oxide (PEO) and chitosan were used as carrier polymers and theophylline anhydrate as a water-soluble model drug. The nanofibers were electrospun with the diluted mixture (7:3) of aqueous acetic acid (90% v/v) and formic acid solution (90% v/v) (with a total solid content of 3% w/v). The fiber diameter and morphology of the nanofibrous DDSs were modulated by varying ultrasonic parameters in the USES process (i.e., frequency, pulse repetition frequency and cycles per pulse). We found that the USES technology produced nanofibers with higher fiber diameter (402 ± 127 nm) than TES (77 ± 21 nm). An increase of a burst count in USES increased the fiber diameter (555 ± 265 nm) and the variation in fiber size. The slight-to-moderate changes in a solid state (crystallinity) were detected when compared the nanofibers generated by TES and USES. In conclusion, USES provides a promising alternative for aqueous-based fabrication of nanofibrous DDSs for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6835569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68355692019-11-25 Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems Hakkarainen, Enni Kõrkjas, Arle Laidmäe, Ivo Lust, Andres Semjonov, Kristian Kogermann, Karin Nieminen, Heikki J. Salmi, Ari Korhonen, Ossi Haeggström, Edward Heinämäki, Jyrki Pharmaceutics Article We investigated nozzleless ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES) as means to generate nanofibrous drug delivery systems (DDSs) for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Traditional electrospinning (TES) equipped with a conventional spinneret was used as a reference method. High-molecular polyethylene oxide (PEO) and chitosan were used as carrier polymers and theophylline anhydrate as a water-soluble model drug. The nanofibers were electrospun with the diluted mixture (7:3) of aqueous acetic acid (90% v/v) and formic acid solution (90% v/v) (with a total solid content of 3% w/v). The fiber diameter and morphology of the nanofibrous DDSs were modulated by varying ultrasonic parameters in the USES process (i.e., frequency, pulse repetition frequency and cycles per pulse). We found that the USES technology produced nanofibers with higher fiber diameter (402 ± 127 nm) than TES (77 ± 21 nm). An increase of a burst count in USES increased the fiber diameter (555 ± 265 nm) and the variation in fiber size. The slight-to-moderate changes in a solid state (crystallinity) were detected when compared the nanofibers generated by TES and USES. In conclusion, USES provides a promising alternative for aqueous-based fabrication of nanofibrous DDSs for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. MDPI 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6835569/ /pubmed/31561640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100495 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hakkarainen, Enni Kõrkjas, Arle Laidmäe, Ivo Lust, Andres Semjonov, Kristian Kogermann, Karin Nieminen, Heikki J. Salmi, Ari Korhonen, Ossi Haeggström, Edward Heinämäki, Jyrki Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems |
title | Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems |
title_full | Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems |
title_short | Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Electrospinning in Fabricating Nanofibrous Drug Delivery Systems |
title_sort | comparison of traditional and ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning in fabricating nanofibrous drug delivery systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hakkarainenenni comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT korkjasarle comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT laidmaeivo comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT lustandres comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT semjonovkristian comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT kogermannkarin comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT nieminenheikkij comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT salmiari comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT korhonenossi comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT haeggstromedward comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems AT heinamakijyrki comparisonoftraditionalandultrasoundenhancedelectrospinninginfabricatingnanofibrousdrugdeliverysystems |