Cargando…

Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oral candidiasis (OC) is an increasing health problem due to the introduction of new drugs, population aging, and increasing prevalence of chronic illness. This study systematically reviews the effects of the oral intake of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on Candida spp. counts (colony-formin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mundula, Tiziana, Ricci, Federica, Barbetta, Beatrice, Baccini, Michela, Amedei, Amedeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31615039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102449
_version_ 1783466808117821440
author Mundula, Tiziana
Ricci, Federica
Barbetta, Beatrice
Baccini, Michela
Amedei, Amedeo
author_facet Mundula, Tiziana
Ricci, Federica
Barbetta, Beatrice
Baccini, Michela
Amedei, Amedeo
author_sort Mundula, Tiziana
collection PubMed
description Oral candidiasis (OC) is an increasing health problem due to the introduction of new drugs, population aging, and increasing prevalence of chronic illness. This study systematically reviews the effects of the oral intake of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on Candida spp. counts (colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) in oral and palatal samples. A literature search was conducted. Twelve studies, eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and four pre-post studies, resulted as eligible for the meta-analysis, which was performed through a Bayesian random-effects model. All studies analyzed probiotics, and none of them analyzed prebiotics or synbiotics. The treatments effects were measured in terms of odds ratio (OR) of OC (CFU/mL >10(2), 10(3), or 10(4)). The meta-analytic OR was 0.71 (95% credibility interval (CrI): 0.37, 1.32), indicating a beneficial effect of treatment; the I(2) index was 56.3%. Focusing only on RCTs, the OR was larger and more precise at 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.27, 0.93). The effect of treatment appeared to be larger on denture wearers. Our findings indicate that the intake of probiotics can have a beneficial effect on OC and that the effects could vary according to the patients’ characteristics. Due to the presence of medium–high-risk studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6836010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68360102019-11-25 Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Mundula, Tiziana Ricci, Federica Barbetta, Beatrice Baccini, Michela Amedei, Amedeo Nutrients Review Oral candidiasis (OC) is an increasing health problem due to the introduction of new drugs, population aging, and increasing prevalence of chronic illness. This study systematically reviews the effects of the oral intake of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on Candida spp. counts (colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) in oral and palatal samples. A literature search was conducted. Twelve studies, eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and four pre-post studies, resulted as eligible for the meta-analysis, which was performed through a Bayesian random-effects model. All studies analyzed probiotics, and none of them analyzed prebiotics or synbiotics. The treatments effects were measured in terms of odds ratio (OR) of OC (CFU/mL >10(2), 10(3), or 10(4)). The meta-analytic OR was 0.71 (95% credibility interval (CrI): 0.37, 1.32), indicating a beneficial effect of treatment; the I(2) index was 56.3%. Focusing only on RCTs, the OR was larger and more precise at 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.27, 0.93). The effect of treatment appeared to be larger on denture wearers. Our findings indicate that the intake of probiotics can have a beneficial effect on OC and that the effects could vary according to the patients’ characteristics. Due to the presence of medium–high-risk studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. MDPI 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6836010/ /pubmed/31615039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102449 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mundula, Tiziana
Ricci, Federica
Barbetta, Beatrice
Baccini, Michela
Amedei, Amedeo
Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of probiotics on oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31615039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102449
work_keys_str_mv AT mundulatiziana effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT riccifederica effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barbettabeatrice effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baccinimichela effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amedeiamedeo effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis