Cargando…
Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Oral candidiasis (OC) is an increasing health problem due to the introduction of new drugs, population aging, and increasing prevalence of chronic illness. This study systematically reviews the effects of the oral intake of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on Candida spp. counts (colony-formin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31615039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102449 |
_version_ | 1783466808117821440 |
---|---|
author | Mundula, Tiziana Ricci, Federica Barbetta, Beatrice Baccini, Michela Amedei, Amedeo |
author_facet | Mundula, Tiziana Ricci, Federica Barbetta, Beatrice Baccini, Michela Amedei, Amedeo |
author_sort | Mundula, Tiziana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oral candidiasis (OC) is an increasing health problem due to the introduction of new drugs, population aging, and increasing prevalence of chronic illness. This study systematically reviews the effects of the oral intake of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on Candida spp. counts (colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) in oral and palatal samples. A literature search was conducted. Twelve studies, eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and four pre-post studies, resulted as eligible for the meta-analysis, which was performed through a Bayesian random-effects model. All studies analyzed probiotics, and none of them analyzed prebiotics or synbiotics. The treatments effects were measured in terms of odds ratio (OR) of OC (CFU/mL >10(2), 10(3), or 10(4)). The meta-analytic OR was 0.71 (95% credibility interval (CrI): 0.37, 1.32), indicating a beneficial effect of treatment; the I(2) index was 56.3%. Focusing only on RCTs, the OR was larger and more precise at 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.27, 0.93). The effect of treatment appeared to be larger on denture wearers. Our findings indicate that the intake of probiotics can have a beneficial effect on OC and that the effects could vary according to the patients’ characteristics. Due to the presence of medium–high-risk studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6836010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68360102019-11-25 Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Mundula, Tiziana Ricci, Federica Barbetta, Beatrice Baccini, Michela Amedei, Amedeo Nutrients Review Oral candidiasis (OC) is an increasing health problem due to the introduction of new drugs, population aging, and increasing prevalence of chronic illness. This study systematically reviews the effects of the oral intake of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on Candida spp. counts (colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) in oral and palatal samples. A literature search was conducted. Twelve studies, eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and four pre-post studies, resulted as eligible for the meta-analysis, which was performed through a Bayesian random-effects model. All studies analyzed probiotics, and none of them analyzed prebiotics or synbiotics. The treatments effects were measured in terms of odds ratio (OR) of OC (CFU/mL >10(2), 10(3), or 10(4)). The meta-analytic OR was 0.71 (95% credibility interval (CrI): 0.37, 1.32), indicating a beneficial effect of treatment; the I(2) index was 56.3%. Focusing only on RCTs, the OR was larger and more precise at 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.27, 0.93). The effect of treatment appeared to be larger on denture wearers. Our findings indicate that the intake of probiotics can have a beneficial effect on OC and that the effects could vary according to the patients’ characteristics. Due to the presence of medium–high-risk studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. MDPI 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6836010/ /pubmed/31615039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102449 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Mundula, Tiziana Ricci, Federica Barbetta, Beatrice Baccini, Michela Amedei, Amedeo Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effect of probiotics on oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31615039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mundulatiziana effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT riccifederica effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barbettabeatrice effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baccinimichela effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT amedeiamedeo effectofprobioticsonoralcandidiasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |