Cargando…
Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study
BACKGROUND: While much effort has been devoted to correcting intraoperative hypothermia, less attention has been directed to preventing redistribution hypothermia. In this study, we compared three different anesthetic induction techniques to standard IV propofol inductions (control) in their effect...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0866-8 |
_version_ | 1783466889793503232 |
---|---|
author | Roth, Jonathan V. Braitman, Leonard E. Hunt, Lacy H. |
author_facet | Roth, Jonathan V. Braitman, Leonard E. Hunt, Lacy H. |
author_sort | Roth, Jonathan V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While much effort has been devoted to correcting intraoperative hypothermia, less attention has been directed to preventing redistribution hypothermia. In this study, we compared three different anesthetic induction techniques to standard IV propofol inductions (control) in their effect on reducing redistribution hypothermia. METHODS: Elective, afebrile patients, age 18 to 55 years, were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 50 each). Group “INH/100” was induced with 8% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, Group “INH/50” with 8% sevoflurane in 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide, Group “PROP” with 2.2 mg/kg propofol, and Group “Phnl/PROP” with 2.2 mg/kg propofol immediately preceded by 160 mcg phenylephrine. Patients were maintained with sevoflurane in 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen in addition to opioid narcotic. Forced air warming was used. Core temperatures were recorded every 15 min after induction for 1 h. RESULTS: Compared to control group PROP, the mean temperatures in groups INH/100, INH/50, and Phnl/PROP were higher 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after induction (p < 0.001 for all comparisons), averaging between 0.39 °C and 0.54 °C higher. In group PROP, 60% of patients had at least one temperature below 36.0 °C in the first hour whereas only 16% did in each of groups INH/100, INH/50, and Phnl/PROP (p < 0.0001 in each group compared to PROP). CONCLUSIONS: In this effectiveness trial, inhalation inductions with sevoflurane or with prophylactic phenylephrine bolus prior to propofol induction reduced the magnitude of redistribution hypothermia by an average of 0.4 to 0.5 °C in patients aged 18 to 55 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on clinical-trials.gov as NCT02331108, November 20, 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6836364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68363642019-11-08 Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study Roth, Jonathan V. Braitman, Leonard E. Hunt, Lacy H. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: While much effort has been devoted to correcting intraoperative hypothermia, less attention has been directed to preventing redistribution hypothermia. In this study, we compared three different anesthetic induction techniques to standard IV propofol inductions (control) in their effect on reducing redistribution hypothermia. METHODS: Elective, afebrile patients, age 18 to 55 years, were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 50 each). Group “INH/100” was induced with 8% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, Group “INH/50” with 8% sevoflurane in 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide, Group “PROP” with 2.2 mg/kg propofol, and Group “Phnl/PROP” with 2.2 mg/kg propofol immediately preceded by 160 mcg phenylephrine. Patients were maintained with sevoflurane in 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen in addition to opioid narcotic. Forced air warming was used. Core temperatures were recorded every 15 min after induction for 1 h. RESULTS: Compared to control group PROP, the mean temperatures in groups INH/100, INH/50, and Phnl/PROP were higher 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after induction (p < 0.001 for all comparisons), averaging between 0.39 °C and 0.54 °C higher. In group PROP, 60% of patients had at least one temperature below 36.0 °C in the first hour whereas only 16% did in each of groups INH/100, INH/50, and Phnl/PROP (p < 0.0001 in each group compared to PROP). CONCLUSIONS: In this effectiveness trial, inhalation inductions with sevoflurane or with prophylactic phenylephrine bolus prior to propofol induction reduced the magnitude of redistribution hypothermia by an average of 0.4 to 0.5 °C in patients aged 18 to 55 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on clinical-trials.gov as NCT02331108, November 20, 2014. BioMed Central 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6836364/ /pubmed/31694576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0866-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Roth, Jonathan V. Braitman, Leonard E. Hunt, Lacy H. Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
title | Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
title_full | Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
title_fullStr | Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
title_short | Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
title_sort | induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0866-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rothjonathanv inductiontechniquesthatreduceredistributionhypothermiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledsingleblindeffectivenessstudy AT braitmanleonarde inductiontechniquesthatreduceredistributionhypothermiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledsingleblindeffectivenessstudy AT huntlacyh inductiontechniquesthatreduceredistributionhypothermiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledsingleblindeffectivenessstudy |