Cargando…
Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016
BACKGROUND: Different tick species are able to transmit different pathogens, and tick-borne diseases are of substantial concern worldwide for both humans and animals. Environmental changes and changes in the range of tick species, including Dermacentor reticulatus in Europe, can affect the spread of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2149-5 |
_version_ | 1783466905222250496 |
---|---|
author | Namina, Agne Capligina, Valentina Seleznova, Maija Krumins, Rudolfs Aleinikova, Darja Kivrane, Agnija Akopjana, Sarmite Lazovska, Marija Berzina, Inese Ranka, Renate |
author_facet | Namina, Agne Capligina, Valentina Seleznova, Maija Krumins, Rudolfs Aleinikova, Darja Kivrane, Agnija Akopjana, Sarmite Lazovska, Marija Berzina, Inese Ranka, Renate |
author_sort | Namina, Agne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Different tick species are able to transmit different pathogens, and tick-borne diseases are of substantial concern worldwide for both humans and animals. Environmental changes and changes in the range of tick species, including Dermacentor reticulatus in Europe, can affect the spread of zoonotic pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from dogs in Latvia, and to explore possible changes between years 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: In 2011, only Ixodes ticks (221 Ixodes ricinus and 22 Ixodes persulcatus) were collected from dogs, while in 2016 tick samples belonged to Ixodes ricinus (360), Ixodes persulcatus (2) and Dermacentor reticulatus (27) species. In total, 35.8 and 40.0% of adult ticks were pathogen-positive in 2011 and 2016, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The molecular analysis indicated the presence of 13 tick-borne microorganisms; the most prevalent pathogen was Rickettsia, followed by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group spirochetes, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia species. Borrelia miyamotoi was also present. A co-infection with two and three tick-borne pathogens was detected in 7.9 and 7.4% of Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus, respectively. The results of this study confirmed that the spread of novel vectors could bring additional risk of exposure to novel emerging pathogens to pets and their owners, as both Babesia canis and Rickettsia raoultii were shown to be highly associated with Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in Latvia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential danger from the inadvertent introduction of novel disease pathogens and vectors. Awareness of co-infections and Dermacentor reticulatus-related pathogens needs to be increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6836430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68364302019-11-08 Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 Namina, Agne Capligina, Valentina Seleznova, Maija Krumins, Rudolfs Aleinikova, Darja Kivrane, Agnija Akopjana, Sarmite Lazovska, Marija Berzina, Inese Ranka, Renate BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Different tick species are able to transmit different pathogens, and tick-borne diseases are of substantial concern worldwide for both humans and animals. Environmental changes and changes in the range of tick species, including Dermacentor reticulatus in Europe, can affect the spread of zoonotic pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from dogs in Latvia, and to explore possible changes between years 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: In 2011, only Ixodes ticks (221 Ixodes ricinus and 22 Ixodes persulcatus) were collected from dogs, while in 2016 tick samples belonged to Ixodes ricinus (360), Ixodes persulcatus (2) and Dermacentor reticulatus (27) species. In total, 35.8 and 40.0% of adult ticks were pathogen-positive in 2011 and 2016, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The molecular analysis indicated the presence of 13 tick-borne microorganisms; the most prevalent pathogen was Rickettsia, followed by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group spirochetes, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia species. Borrelia miyamotoi was also present. A co-infection with two and three tick-borne pathogens was detected in 7.9 and 7.4% of Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus, respectively. The results of this study confirmed that the spread of novel vectors could bring additional risk of exposure to novel emerging pathogens to pets and their owners, as both Babesia canis and Rickettsia raoultii were shown to be highly associated with Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in Latvia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential danger from the inadvertent introduction of novel disease pathogens and vectors. Awareness of co-infections and Dermacentor reticulatus-related pathogens needs to be increased. BioMed Central 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6836430/ /pubmed/31694625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2149-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Namina, Agne Capligina, Valentina Seleznova, Maija Krumins, Rudolfs Aleinikova, Darja Kivrane, Agnija Akopjana, Sarmite Lazovska, Marija Berzina, Inese Ranka, Renate Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 |
title | Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 |
title_full | Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 |
title_fullStr | Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 |
title_short | Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016 |
title_sort | tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, latvia, 2011–2016 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2149-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naminaagne tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT capliginavalentina tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT seleznovamaija tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT kruminsrudolfs tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT aleinikovadarja tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT kivraneagnija tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT akopjanasarmite tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT lazovskamarija tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT berzinainese tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 AT rankarenate tickbornepathogensintickscollectedfromdogslatvia20112016 |