Cargando…
Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression
BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥70‐year‐old) are under‐represented in the published data pertaining to unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD). Hypothesis: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) might be comparable to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for revascularization of ULMCAD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23253 |
_version_ | 1783467002609795072 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Mahin R. Kayani, Waleed T. Ahmad, Waqas Manan, Malalai Hira, Ravi S. Hamzeh, Ihab Jneid, Hani Virani, Salim S. Kleiman, Neal Lakkis, Nasser Alam, Mahboob |
author_facet | Khan, Mahin R. Kayani, Waleed T. Ahmad, Waqas Manan, Malalai Hira, Ravi S. Hamzeh, Ihab Jneid, Hani Virani, Salim S. Kleiman, Neal Lakkis, Nasser Alam, Mahboob |
author_sort | Khan, Mahin R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥70‐year‐old) are under‐represented in the published data pertaining to unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD). Hypothesis: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) might be comparable to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for revascularization of ULMCAD. METHODS: We compared PCI versus CABG in older adults with ULMCAD with an aggregate data meta‐analyses (4880 patients) of clinical outcomes [all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events(MACCE)] at 30 days, 12‐24 months & ≥36 months in patients with mean age ≥70 years and ULMCAD. A meta‐regression analysis evaluated the effect of age on mortality after PCI. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random‐effects model. RESULTS: All‐cause mortality between PCI and CABG was comparable at 30‐days (OR0.77, 95% CI 0.42‐ 1.41) and 12‐24‐months (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.78‐1.93). PCI was associated with a markedly lower rate of stroke at 30‐day follow‐up in octogenarians (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02‐0.76) but an overall higher rate of repeat revascularization. At ≥36‐months, MACCE (OR 1.26,95% CI 0.99‐1.60) and all‐cause mortality (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.00‐1.93) showed a trend favoring CABG but did not reach statistical significance. On meta‐regression, PCI was associated with a higher mortality with advancing age (coefficient=0.1033, p=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: PCI was associated with a markedly lower rate of early stroke in octogenarians as compared to CABG. All‐cause mortality was comparable between the two arms with a trend favoring CABG at ≥36‐months.PCI was however associated with increasing mortality with advancing age as compared to CABG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6837018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68370182019-11-12 Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression Khan, Mahin R. Kayani, Waleed T. Ahmad, Waqas Manan, Malalai Hira, Ravi S. Hamzeh, Ihab Jneid, Hani Virani, Salim S. Kleiman, Neal Lakkis, Nasser Alam, Mahboob Clin Cardiol Reviews BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥70‐year‐old) are under‐represented in the published data pertaining to unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD). Hypothesis: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) might be comparable to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for revascularization of ULMCAD. METHODS: We compared PCI versus CABG in older adults with ULMCAD with an aggregate data meta‐analyses (4880 patients) of clinical outcomes [all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events(MACCE)] at 30 days, 12‐24 months & ≥36 months in patients with mean age ≥70 years and ULMCAD. A meta‐regression analysis evaluated the effect of age on mortality after PCI. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random‐effects model. RESULTS: All‐cause mortality between PCI and CABG was comparable at 30‐days (OR0.77, 95% CI 0.42‐ 1.41) and 12‐24‐months (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.78‐1.93). PCI was associated with a markedly lower rate of stroke at 30‐day follow‐up in octogenarians (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02‐0.76) but an overall higher rate of repeat revascularization. At ≥36‐months, MACCE (OR 1.26,95% CI 0.99‐1.60) and all‐cause mortality (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.00‐1.93) showed a trend favoring CABG but did not reach statistical significance. On meta‐regression, PCI was associated with a higher mortality with advancing age (coefficient=0.1033, p=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: PCI was associated with a markedly lower rate of early stroke in octogenarians as compared to CABG. All‐cause mortality was comparable between the two arms with a trend favoring CABG at ≥36‐months.PCI was however associated with increasing mortality with advancing age as compared to CABG. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6837018/ /pubmed/31486094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23253 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Khan, Mahin R. Kayani, Waleed T. Ahmad, Waqas Manan, Malalai Hira, Ravi S. Hamzeh, Ihab Jneid, Hani Virani, Salim S. Kleiman, Neal Lakkis, Nasser Alam, Mahboob Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
title | Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
title_full | Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
title_fullStr | Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
title_short | Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
title_sort | effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta‐analysis and meta‐regression |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanmahinr effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT kayaniwaleedt effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT ahmadwaqas effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT mananmalalai effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT hiraravis effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT hamzehihab effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT jneidhani effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT viranisalims effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT kleimanneal effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT lakkisnasser effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression AT alammahboob effectofincreasingageonpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvscoronaryarterybypassgraftinginolderadultswithunprotectedleftmaincoronaryarterydiseaseametaanalysisandmetaregression |