Cargando…

Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of ultrasound examination in Primary Care (PC) for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in male patients from 65-75 years old, as well as the consistency between observers on the diagnosis between general practitioners and the reference specialty in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bravo-Merino, Laura, González-Lozano, Noelia, Maroto-Salmón, Ruth, Meijide-Santos, Gloria, Suárez-Gil, Patricio, Fañanás-Mastral, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.10.005
_version_ 1783467021365673984
author Bravo-Merino, Laura
González-Lozano, Noelia
Maroto-Salmón, Ruth
Meijide-Santos, Gloria
Suárez-Gil, Patricio
Fañanás-Mastral, Ana
author_facet Bravo-Merino, Laura
González-Lozano, Noelia
Maroto-Salmón, Ruth
Meijide-Santos, Gloria
Suárez-Gil, Patricio
Fañanás-Mastral, Ana
author_sort Bravo-Merino, Laura
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of ultrasound examination in Primary Care (PC) for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in male patients from 65-75 years old, as well as the consistency between observers on the diagnosis between general practitioners and the reference specialty in this area, Vascular Surgery. To estimate the prevalence of AAA in that population and its association with risk factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. LOCATION: Healthcare Centres of Coto and Calzada II (Gijón, Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Males born between 1 January 1939 and 31 December 1950. INTERVENTIONS: From the 2,511 males found, 407 were selected using stratified random sampling. Aortic diameter was measured, with those ≥3 cm and 20% from the <3 cm being referred for a second measurement by a vascular surgeon. VARIABLES: Dependent: presence/absence of aneurism. Independent: age, abdominal perimeter, smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, familial cases of AAA, cerebrovascular accident, and coronary disease. The analysis was performed using Bayesian inference with models for proportions and a multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 304 ultrasound scans performed, 13 were referred with suspicion of AAA, and 63 with were within normal. The sensitivity was 93.3% and specificity 98.5% with a 95% credibility interval (CredI) of 75.4-99.9%, and 94.3-100%, respectively. The prevalence was 4.6% (95% CredI: 2.5-7.2%, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between PC and Vascular Surgery was 0.88 (95% CredI: 0.79-0.94). Age, smoking, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes tended to increase the odds of prevalence of AAA. CONCLUSION: The ultrasound performed by GPs for the detection of AAA had high diagnostic validity. Further studies on the effectiveness should be conducted in order to assess the appropriateness of introducing a system of early detection of AAA in the risk population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6837097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68370972019-11-20 Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años() Bravo-Merino, Laura González-Lozano, Noelia Maroto-Salmón, Ruth Meijide-Santos, Gloria Suárez-Gil, Patricio Fañanás-Mastral, Ana Aten Primaria Original OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of ultrasound examination in Primary Care (PC) for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in male patients from 65-75 years old, as well as the consistency between observers on the diagnosis between general practitioners and the reference specialty in this area, Vascular Surgery. To estimate the prevalence of AAA in that population and its association with risk factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. LOCATION: Healthcare Centres of Coto and Calzada II (Gijón, Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Males born between 1 January 1939 and 31 December 1950. INTERVENTIONS: From the 2,511 males found, 407 were selected using stratified random sampling. Aortic diameter was measured, with those ≥3 cm and 20% from the <3 cm being referred for a second measurement by a vascular surgeon. VARIABLES: Dependent: presence/absence of aneurism. Independent: age, abdominal perimeter, smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, familial cases of AAA, cerebrovascular accident, and coronary disease. The analysis was performed using Bayesian inference with models for proportions and a multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 304 ultrasound scans performed, 13 were referred with suspicion of AAA, and 63 with were within normal. The sensitivity was 93.3% and specificity 98.5% with a 95% credibility interval (CredI) of 75.4-99.9%, and 94.3-100%, respectively. The prevalence was 4.6% (95% CredI: 2.5-7.2%, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between PC and Vascular Surgery was 0.88 (95% CredI: 0.79-0.94). Age, smoking, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes tended to increase the odds of prevalence of AAA. CONCLUSION: The ultrasound performed by GPs for the detection of AAA had high diagnostic validity. Further studies on the effectiveness should be conducted in order to assess the appropriateness of introducing a system of early detection of AAA in the risk population. Elsevier 2019-01 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6837097/ /pubmed/29225000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.10.005 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original
Bravo-Merino, Laura
González-Lozano, Noelia
Maroto-Salmón, Ruth
Meijide-Santos, Gloria
Suárez-Gil, Patricio
Fañanás-Mastral, Ana
Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
title Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
title_full Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
title_fullStr Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
title_full_unstemmed Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
title_short Validez de la ecografía abdominal en Atención Primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
title_sort validez de la ecografía abdominal en atención primaria para detección de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en varones de entre 65 y 75 años()
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.10.005
work_keys_str_mv AT bravomerinolaura validezdelaecografiaabdominalenatencionprimariaparadetecciondeaneurismadeaortaabdominalenvaronesdeentre65y75anos
AT gonzalezlozanonoelia validezdelaecografiaabdominalenatencionprimariaparadetecciondeaneurismadeaortaabdominalenvaronesdeentre65y75anos
AT marotosalmonruth validezdelaecografiaabdominalenatencionprimariaparadetecciondeaneurismadeaortaabdominalenvaronesdeentre65y75anos
AT meijidesantosgloria validezdelaecografiaabdominalenatencionprimariaparadetecciondeaneurismadeaortaabdominalenvaronesdeentre65y75anos
AT suarezgilpatricio validezdelaecografiaabdominalenatencionprimariaparadetecciondeaneurismadeaortaabdominalenvaronesdeentre65y75anos
AT fananasmastralana validezdelaecografiaabdominalenatencionprimariaparadetecciondeaneurismadeaortaabdominalenvaronesdeentre65y75anos