Cargando…

Eficiencia entre los diferentes patrones de medida de la automonitorización de la presión arterial en el seguimiento del hipertenso en atención primaria()

OBJECTIVE: To identify the most efficient measurement pattern of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) for the follow-up of hypertensive patients in primary care. DESIGN: Validation study of a diagnostic test. SETTING: Primary care team in Murcia, Spain. POPULATION: One hundred and fifty three hyper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De León-Robert, Arleen, Hidalgo-García, Isabel, Gascón-Cánovas, Juan, Antón-Botella, José, López-Alegría, Carmen, Campusano Castellanos, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.11.006
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To identify the most efficient measurement pattern of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) for the follow-up of hypertensive patients in primary care. DESIGN: Validation study of a diagnostic test. SETTING: Primary care team in Murcia, Spain. POPULATION: One hundred and fifty three hypertensive patients younger than 80 years who met the inclusion criteria, who used HBPM and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Performing HBPM for 24 hours. The HBPM protocol consisted of recording 2 measurements in the morning and 2 in the evening for 7 days. With the records obtained, the different HBPM patterns were established (7, 6, 5, 4, 3 days). The ROC curves were used for the analysis, together with the correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The best areas under the curve for the systolic pressure of the different HBPM patterns corresponded to the 4-day pattern: 0.837 (0.77-0.90); and the 3 day one: 0.834 (0.77-0.90). As for diastolic pressure, the 7-day pattern had an area under the curve of 0.889 (0.84-0.94); followed by the 3 and 4 days patterns, which had the same statistical result both: 0.834 (0.83-0.94). There were no significant differences between correlation coefficients for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The 3-day pattern showed a lower dispersion in the Bland-Altman plots. CONCLUSION: The 3 days HBPM pattern is proposed for the follow-up of the hypertensive patient, since it does not have an inferior efficiency to the other patterns.