Cargando…

Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the care received by chronic patients from their point of view and objectify the factors related with a better assessment of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study realized between September 2014 and April 2015. LOCATION: Nine Health Centers of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adrián-Arrieta, Leyre, Casas Fernández de Tejerina, Juan Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.03.014
_version_ 1783467028204486656
author Adrián-Arrieta, Leyre
Casas Fernández de Tejerina, Juan Manuel
author_facet Adrián-Arrieta, Leyre
Casas Fernández de Tejerina, Juan Manuel
author_sort Adrián-Arrieta, Leyre
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the care received by chronic patients from their point of view and objectify the factors related with a better assessment of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study realized between September 2014 and April 2015. LOCATION: Nine Health Centers of Navarra (6 urban and 3 rural), Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Sampling opportunity of 196 patients aged over 65 years presenting at least one chronic disease. MAIN MEASURES: Outcome variable: Evaluation of the care received through the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) test (score 1 to 5, higher values indicate better perception about quality of care). Explanatory variables: quality of life employing the EQ5D instrument, Katz index and Gijón's socio-family evaluation scale. Other variables studied were: sex, age, education, Charlson index and number of chronic diseases. The association between the PACIC numerical value with the rest of the variables was calculated. RESULTS: The assessment of the care received according to the PACIC was higher with more chronic diseases (rho: 0.196; p = 0.006), with less autonomy (mild or no disability: mean 2.9; SD: 0.6 vs. moderate or severe disability: mean 3.3; SD: 0.2; P = .003), in those with worse quality of life (EQ5D5L Index value rho: −0.227; P = .001. EQ VAS rho: −0.145; P = .043), and in those with a more favorable social situation (rho: −0.167; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: The perception of chronic patients about the received care is better with an increased number of chronic diseases and with less autonomy and quality of life. The social environment influences the care perception of the patient, being this worse in environments with higher social risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6837126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68371262019-11-20 Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas() Adrián-Arrieta, Leyre Casas Fernández de Tejerina, Juan Manuel Aten Primaria Original OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the care received by chronic patients from their point of view and objectify the factors related with a better assessment of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study realized between September 2014 and April 2015. LOCATION: Nine Health Centers of Navarra (6 urban and 3 rural), Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Sampling opportunity of 196 patients aged over 65 years presenting at least one chronic disease. MAIN MEASURES: Outcome variable: Evaluation of the care received through the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) test (score 1 to 5, higher values indicate better perception about quality of care). Explanatory variables: quality of life employing the EQ5D instrument, Katz index and Gijón's socio-family evaluation scale. Other variables studied were: sex, age, education, Charlson index and number of chronic diseases. The association between the PACIC numerical value with the rest of the variables was calculated. RESULTS: The assessment of the care received according to the PACIC was higher with more chronic diseases (rho: 0.196; p = 0.006), with less autonomy (mild or no disability: mean 2.9; SD: 0.6 vs. moderate or severe disability: mean 3.3; SD: 0.2; P = .003), in those with worse quality of life (EQ5D5L Index value rho: −0.227; P = .001. EQ VAS rho: −0.145; P = .043), and in those with a more favorable social situation (rho: −0.167; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: The perception of chronic patients about the received care is better with an increased number of chronic diseases and with less autonomy and quality of life. The social environment influences the care perception of the patient, being this worse in environments with higher social risk. Elsevier 2018 2017-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6837126/ /pubmed/28882623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.03.014 Text en © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original
Adrián-Arrieta, Leyre
Casas Fernández de Tejerina, Juan Manuel
Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
title Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
title_full Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
title_fullStr Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
title_short Evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
title_sort evaluación de los cuidados recibidos por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas()
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.03.014
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianarrietaleyre evaluaciondeloscuidadosrecibidosporpacientesconenfermedadescronicas
AT casasfernandezdetejerinajuanmanuel evaluaciondeloscuidadosrecibidosporpacientesconenfermedadescronicas