Cargando…

MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators are disadvantaged because of poor access to MRI scans, leading to late and misdiagnosis particularly for cancer and neurological disease. New technology allied to tested protocols now allows safe MRI scanning of such patients; however,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhuva, Anish N, Feuchter, Patricia, Hawkins, Angela, Cash, Lizette, Boubertakh, Redha, Evanson, Jane, Schilling, Richard, Lowe, Martin, Moon, James C, Manisty, Charlotte H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009079
_version_ 1783467055111995392
author Bhuva, Anish N
Feuchter, Patricia
Hawkins, Angela
Cash, Lizette
Boubertakh, Redha
Evanson, Jane
Schilling, Richard
Lowe, Martin
Moon, James C
Manisty, Charlotte H
author_facet Bhuva, Anish N
Feuchter, Patricia
Hawkins, Angela
Cash, Lizette
Boubertakh, Redha
Evanson, Jane
Schilling, Richard
Lowe, Martin
Moon, James C
Manisty, Charlotte H
author_sort Bhuva, Anish N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators are disadvantaged because of poor access to MRI scans, leading to late and misdiagnosis particularly for cancer and neurological disease. New technology allied to tested protocols now allows safe MRI scanning of such patients; however, logistical barriers persist. AIM: To deliver a streamlined sustainable service that provides timely MRI scans to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: Patients requested a ‘one-stop’ service for MRI, whereby devices could be reprogrammed and scans acquired at a single location and visit. To provide this ‘one-stop’ service, we trained a team including administrators, physicians, cardiac physiologists and radiographers. A standard protocol was used to prevent unnecessary request refusals and delays to scheduling. Service volume, waiting time and safety were analysed 6 months before and 2 years after service redesign. Waiting times for internal and external inpatient referrals plus time to treatment for patients on a cancer pathway were analysed. RESULTS: 215 MRI scans were performed over 2 years. After service redesign, MRI provision increased six-fold to 20 times the national average with reduced waiting time from 60 to 15 days and no adverse events. Departmental throughput was maintained. 85 (40%) referrals were external. 41 (19%) inpatients were scanned, reducing bed-stay by 3 days for internal referrals. 24 (11%) scans were for suspected cancer, 83% allowed treatment within the national standard of 62 days. There was no preintervention service for either inpatients or suspected cancer investigation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a ‘one-stop’ service model to provide MRI for patients with CIEDs is safe, streamlined, scalable and has reduced delays making economic and clinical sense. Protocols and checklists are available at mrimypacemaker.com.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6837254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68372542019-11-12 MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model Bhuva, Anish N Feuchter, Patricia Hawkins, Angela Cash, Lizette Boubertakh, Redha Evanson, Jane Schilling, Richard Lowe, Martin Moon, James C Manisty, Charlotte H BMJ Qual Saf Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators are disadvantaged because of poor access to MRI scans, leading to late and misdiagnosis particularly for cancer and neurological disease. New technology allied to tested protocols now allows safe MRI scanning of such patients; however, logistical barriers persist. AIM: To deliver a streamlined sustainable service that provides timely MRI scans to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: Patients requested a ‘one-stop’ service for MRI, whereby devices could be reprogrammed and scans acquired at a single location and visit. To provide this ‘one-stop’ service, we trained a team including administrators, physicians, cardiac physiologists and radiographers. A standard protocol was used to prevent unnecessary request refusals and delays to scheduling. Service volume, waiting time and safety were analysed 6 months before and 2 years after service redesign. Waiting times for internal and external inpatient referrals plus time to treatment for patients on a cancer pathway were analysed. RESULTS: 215 MRI scans were performed over 2 years. After service redesign, MRI provision increased six-fold to 20 times the national average with reduced waiting time from 60 to 15 days and no adverse events. Departmental throughput was maintained. 85 (40%) referrals were external. 41 (19%) inpatients were scanned, reducing bed-stay by 3 days for internal referrals. 24 (11%) scans were for suspected cancer, 83% allowed treatment within the national standard of 62 days. There was no preintervention service for either inpatients or suspected cancer investigation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a ‘one-stop’ service model to provide MRI for patients with CIEDs is safe, streamlined, scalable and has reduced delays making economic and clinical sense. Protocols and checklists are available at mrimypacemaker.com. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6837254/ /pubmed/30760606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009079 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Bhuva, Anish N
Feuchter, Patricia
Hawkins, Angela
Cash, Lizette
Boubertakh, Redha
Evanson, Jane
Schilling, Richard
Lowe, Martin
Moon, James C
Manisty, Charlotte H
MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
title MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
title_full MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
title_fullStr MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
title_full_unstemmed MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
title_short MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
title_sort mri for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a ‘one-stop’ service model
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009079
work_keys_str_mv AT bhuvaanishn mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT feuchterpatricia mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT hawkinsangela mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT cashlizette mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT boubertakhredha mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT evansonjane mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT schillingrichard mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT lowemartin mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT moonjamesc mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel
AT manistycharlotteh mriforpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicessimplifyingcomplexitywithaonestopservicemodel