Cargando…
Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the results of a visual field (VF) test for patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss. These patients exhibit fixation loss (FL) rates >20% with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA); however, actual fixation stabilizes when a head-mounted p...
Autores principales: | Goukon, Hiroyasu, Hirasawa, Kazunori, Kasahara, Masayuki, Matsumura, Kazuhiro, Shoji, Nobuyuki |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31697732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224711 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo(®)) and Humphrey Field Analyzer
por: Kimura, Tairo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Diagnostic capability of Pulsar perimetry in pre-perimetric and early glaucoma
por: Hirasawa, Kazunori, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of the monocular Humphrey visual field and the binocular Humphrey esterman visual field test for driver licensing in glaucoma subjects in Sweden
por: Ayala, Marcelo
Publicado: (2012) -
Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients
por: Hirasawa, Kazunori, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Comparison between Humphrey Field Analyzer and Micro Perimeter 1 in normal and glaucoma subjects
por: Ratra, Vineet, et al.
Publicado: (2012)