Cargando…
Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
BACKGROUND: A DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31658264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778 |
_version_ | 1783467089387847680 |
---|---|
author | Ayana, Mio Cools, Piet Mekonnen, Zeleke Biruksew, Abdissa Dana, Daniel Rashwan, Nour Prichard, Roger Vlaminck, Johnny Verweij, Jaco J. Levecke, Bruno |
author_facet | Ayana, Mio Cools, Piet Mekonnen, Zeleke Biruksew, Abdissa Dana, Daniel Rashwan, Nour Prichard, Roger Vlaminck, Johnny Verweij, Jaco J. Levecke, Bruno |
author_sort | Ayana, Mio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). In the present study, we assessed the impact of different DNA extraction and preservativation protocols on STH-specific DNA amplification from stool. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a first experiment, DNA was extracted from 37 stool samples with variable egg counts for T. trichiura and N. americanus applying two commercial kits, both with and without a prior bead beating step. The DNA concentration of T. trichiura and N. americanus was estimated by means of qPCR. The results showed clear differences in DNA concentration across both DNA extraction kits, which varied across both STHs. They also indicated that adding a bead beating step substantially improved DNA recovery, particularly when the FECs were high. In a second experiment, 20 stool samples with variable egg counts for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and N. americanus were preserved in either 96% ethanol, 5% potassium dichromate or RNAlater and were stored at 4°C for 65, 245 and 425 days. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit with a bead beating step. Stool samples preserved in ethanol proved to yield higher DNA concentrations as FEC increased, although stool samples appeared to be stable over time in all preservatives. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of DNA extraction kit significantly affects the outcome of NAATs. Given the clear benefit of bead beating and our validation of ethanol for (long-term) preservation, we recommend that these aspects of the protocol should be adopted by any stool sampling and DNA extraction protocol for downstream NAAT-based detection and quantification of STHs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6837582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68375822019-11-12 Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool Ayana, Mio Cools, Piet Mekonnen, Zeleke Biruksew, Abdissa Dana, Daniel Rashwan, Nour Prichard, Roger Vlaminck, Johnny Verweij, Jaco J. Levecke, Bruno PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: A DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). In the present study, we assessed the impact of different DNA extraction and preservativation protocols on STH-specific DNA amplification from stool. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a first experiment, DNA was extracted from 37 stool samples with variable egg counts for T. trichiura and N. americanus applying two commercial kits, both with and without a prior bead beating step. The DNA concentration of T. trichiura and N. americanus was estimated by means of qPCR. The results showed clear differences in DNA concentration across both DNA extraction kits, which varied across both STHs. They also indicated that adding a bead beating step substantially improved DNA recovery, particularly when the FECs were high. In a second experiment, 20 stool samples with variable egg counts for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and N. americanus were preserved in either 96% ethanol, 5% potassium dichromate or RNAlater and were stored at 4°C for 65, 245 and 425 days. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit with a bead beating step. Stool samples preserved in ethanol proved to yield higher DNA concentrations as FEC increased, although stool samples appeared to be stable over time in all preservatives. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of DNA extraction kit significantly affects the outcome of NAATs. Given the clear benefit of bead beating and our validation of ethanol for (long-term) preservation, we recommend that these aspects of the protocol should be adopted by any stool sampling and DNA extraction protocol for downstream NAAT-based detection and quantification of STHs. Public Library of Science 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6837582/ /pubmed/31658264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778 Text en © 2019 Ayana et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ayana, Mio Cools, Piet Mekonnen, Zeleke Biruksew, Abdissa Dana, Daniel Rashwan, Nour Prichard, Roger Vlaminck, Johnny Verweij, Jaco J. Levecke, Bruno Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
title | Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
title_full | Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
title_fullStr | Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
title_short | Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
title_sort | comparison of four dna extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31658264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ayanamio comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT coolspiet comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT mekonnenzeleke comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT biruksewabdissa comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT danadaniel comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT rashwannour comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT prichardroger comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT vlaminckjohnny comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT verweijjacoj comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool AT leveckebruno comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool |