Cargando…

Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool

BACKGROUND: A DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayana, Mio, Cools, Piet, Mekonnen, Zeleke, Biruksew, Abdissa, Dana, Daniel, Rashwan, Nour, Prichard, Roger, Vlaminck, Johnny, Verweij, Jaco J., Levecke, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31658264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778
_version_ 1783467089387847680
author Ayana, Mio
Cools, Piet
Mekonnen, Zeleke
Biruksew, Abdissa
Dana, Daniel
Rashwan, Nour
Prichard, Roger
Vlaminck, Johnny
Verweij, Jaco J.
Levecke, Bruno
author_facet Ayana, Mio
Cools, Piet
Mekonnen, Zeleke
Biruksew, Abdissa
Dana, Daniel
Rashwan, Nour
Prichard, Roger
Vlaminck, Johnny
Verweij, Jaco J.
Levecke, Bruno
author_sort Ayana, Mio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). In the present study, we assessed the impact of different DNA extraction and preservativation protocols on STH-specific DNA amplification from stool. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a first experiment, DNA was extracted from 37 stool samples with variable egg counts for T. trichiura and N. americanus applying two commercial kits, both with and without a prior bead beating step. The DNA concentration of T. trichiura and N. americanus was estimated by means of qPCR. The results showed clear differences in DNA concentration across both DNA extraction kits, which varied across both STHs. They also indicated that adding a bead beating step substantially improved DNA recovery, particularly when the FECs were high. In a second experiment, 20 stool samples with variable egg counts for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and N. americanus were preserved in either 96% ethanol, 5% potassium dichromate or RNAlater and were stored at 4°C for 65, 245 and 425 days. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit with a bead beating step. Stool samples preserved in ethanol proved to yield higher DNA concentrations as FEC increased, although stool samples appeared to be stable over time in all preservatives. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of DNA extraction kit significantly affects the outcome of NAATs. Given the clear benefit of bead beating and our validation of ethanol for (long-term) preservation, we recommend that these aspects of the protocol should be adopted by any stool sampling and DNA extraction protocol for downstream NAAT-based detection and quantification of STHs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6837582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68375822019-11-12 Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool Ayana, Mio Cools, Piet Mekonnen, Zeleke Biruksew, Abdissa Dana, Daniel Rashwan, Nour Prichard, Roger Vlaminck, Johnny Verweij, Jaco J. Levecke, Bruno PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: A DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). In the present study, we assessed the impact of different DNA extraction and preservativation protocols on STH-specific DNA amplification from stool. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a first experiment, DNA was extracted from 37 stool samples with variable egg counts for T. trichiura and N. americanus applying two commercial kits, both with and without a prior bead beating step. The DNA concentration of T. trichiura and N. americanus was estimated by means of qPCR. The results showed clear differences in DNA concentration across both DNA extraction kits, which varied across both STHs. They also indicated that adding a bead beating step substantially improved DNA recovery, particularly when the FECs were high. In a second experiment, 20 stool samples with variable egg counts for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and N. americanus were preserved in either 96% ethanol, 5% potassium dichromate or RNAlater and were stored at 4°C for 65, 245 and 425 days. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit with a bead beating step. Stool samples preserved in ethanol proved to yield higher DNA concentrations as FEC increased, although stool samples appeared to be stable over time in all preservatives. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of DNA extraction kit significantly affects the outcome of NAATs. Given the clear benefit of bead beating and our validation of ethanol for (long-term) preservation, we recommend that these aspects of the protocol should be adopted by any stool sampling and DNA extraction protocol for downstream NAAT-based detection and quantification of STHs. Public Library of Science 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6837582/ /pubmed/31658264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778 Text en © 2019 Ayana et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ayana, Mio
Cools, Piet
Mekonnen, Zeleke
Biruksew, Abdissa
Dana, Daniel
Rashwan, Nour
Prichard, Roger
Vlaminck, Johnny
Verweij, Jaco J.
Levecke, Bruno
Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
title Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
title_full Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
title_fullStr Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
title_short Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
title_sort comparison of four dna extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31658264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778
work_keys_str_mv AT ayanamio comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT coolspiet comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT mekonnenzeleke comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT biruksewabdissa comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT danadaniel comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT rashwannour comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT prichardroger comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT vlaminckjohnny comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT verweijjacoj comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool
AT leveckebruno comparisonoffourdnaextractionandthreepreservationprotocolsforthemoleculardetectionandquantificationofsoiltransmittedhelminthsinstool