Cargando…

Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry

Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Audenaert, E. A., Pattyn, C., Steenackers, G., De Roeck, J., Vandermeulen, D., Claes, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737620
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302
_version_ 1783467132022947840
author Audenaert, E. A.
Pattyn, C.
Steenackers, G.
De Roeck, J.
Vandermeulen, D.
Claes, P.
author_facet Audenaert, E. A.
Pattyn, C.
Steenackers, G.
De Roeck, J.
Vandermeulen, D.
Claes, P.
author_sort Audenaert, E. A.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total variance of that population to a selected threshold, while reducing its dimensionality. Even though SSMs have been used for over two decades, they lack in characterization of their goodness of prediction, in particular when defining whether these models are actually representative for a given population. Methods: The current paper presents, to the authors' knowledge, the most extent lower limb anatomy shape model considering the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneum to date. The present study includes the segmented training shapes (n = 542) obtained from 271 lower limb CT scans. The different models were evaluated in terms of accuracy, compactness, generalizability as well as specificity. Results: The size of training samples needed in each model so that it can be considered population covering was estimated to approximate around 200 samples, based on the generalizability properties of the different models. Simultaneously differences in gender and patterns in left-right asymmetry were identified and characterized. Size was found to be the most pronounced sexual discriminator whereas intra-individual variations in asymmetry were most pronounced at the insertion site of muscles. Conclusion: For models aimed at population covering descriptive studies, the number of training samples required should amount a sizeable 200 samples. The geometric morphometric method for sex discrimination scored excellent, however, it did not largely outperformed traditional methods based on discrete measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6837998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68379982019-11-15 Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry Audenaert, E. A. Pattyn, C. Steenackers, G. De Roeck, J. Vandermeulen, D. Claes, P. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total variance of that population to a selected threshold, while reducing its dimensionality. Even though SSMs have been used for over two decades, they lack in characterization of their goodness of prediction, in particular when defining whether these models are actually representative for a given population. Methods: The current paper presents, to the authors' knowledge, the most extent lower limb anatomy shape model considering the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneum to date. The present study includes the segmented training shapes (n = 542) obtained from 271 lower limb CT scans. The different models were evaluated in terms of accuracy, compactness, generalizability as well as specificity. Results: The size of training samples needed in each model so that it can be considered population covering was estimated to approximate around 200 samples, based on the generalizability properties of the different models. Simultaneously differences in gender and patterns in left-right asymmetry were identified and characterized. Size was found to be the most pronounced sexual discriminator whereas intra-individual variations in asymmetry were most pronounced at the insertion site of muscles. Conclusion: For models aimed at population covering descriptive studies, the number of training samples required should amount a sizeable 200 samples. The geometric morphometric method for sex discrimination scored excellent, however, it did not largely outperformed traditional methods based on discrete measures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6837998/ /pubmed/31737620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302 Text en Copyright © 2019 Audenaert, Pattyn, Steenackers, De Roeck, Vandermeulen and Claes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Audenaert, E. A.
Pattyn, C.
Steenackers, G.
De Roeck, J.
Vandermeulen, D.
Claes, P.
Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
title Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
title_full Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
title_fullStr Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
title_full_unstemmed Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
title_short Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
title_sort statistical shape modeling of skeletal anatomy for sex discrimination: their training size, sexual dimorphism, and asymmetry
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737620
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302
work_keys_str_mv AT audenaertea statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry
AT pattync statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry
AT steenackersg statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry
AT deroeckj statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry
AT vandermeulend statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry
AT claesp statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry