Cargando…
Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry
Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total va...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302 |
_version_ | 1783467132022947840 |
---|---|
author | Audenaert, E. A. Pattyn, C. Steenackers, G. De Roeck, J. Vandermeulen, D. Claes, P. |
author_facet | Audenaert, E. A. Pattyn, C. Steenackers, G. De Roeck, J. Vandermeulen, D. Claes, P. |
author_sort | Audenaert, E. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total variance of that population to a selected threshold, while reducing its dimensionality. Even though SSMs have been used for over two decades, they lack in characterization of their goodness of prediction, in particular when defining whether these models are actually representative for a given population. Methods: The current paper presents, to the authors' knowledge, the most extent lower limb anatomy shape model considering the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneum to date. The present study includes the segmented training shapes (n = 542) obtained from 271 lower limb CT scans. The different models were evaluated in terms of accuracy, compactness, generalizability as well as specificity. Results: The size of training samples needed in each model so that it can be considered population covering was estimated to approximate around 200 samples, based on the generalizability properties of the different models. Simultaneously differences in gender and patterns in left-right asymmetry were identified and characterized. Size was found to be the most pronounced sexual discriminator whereas intra-individual variations in asymmetry were most pronounced at the insertion site of muscles. Conclusion: For models aimed at population covering descriptive studies, the number of training samples required should amount a sizeable 200 samples. The geometric morphometric method for sex discrimination scored excellent, however, it did not largely outperformed traditional methods based on discrete measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6837998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68379982019-11-15 Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry Audenaert, E. A. Pattyn, C. Steenackers, G. De Roeck, J. Vandermeulen, D. Claes, P. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total variance of that population to a selected threshold, while reducing its dimensionality. Even though SSMs have been used for over two decades, they lack in characterization of their goodness of prediction, in particular when defining whether these models are actually representative for a given population. Methods: The current paper presents, to the authors' knowledge, the most extent lower limb anatomy shape model considering the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneum to date. The present study includes the segmented training shapes (n = 542) obtained from 271 lower limb CT scans. The different models were evaluated in terms of accuracy, compactness, generalizability as well as specificity. Results: The size of training samples needed in each model so that it can be considered population covering was estimated to approximate around 200 samples, based on the generalizability properties of the different models. Simultaneously differences in gender and patterns in left-right asymmetry were identified and characterized. Size was found to be the most pronounced sexual discriminator whereas intra-individual variations in asymmetry were most pronounced at the insertion site of muscles. Conclusion: For models aimed at population covering descriptive studies, the number of training samples required should amount a sizeable 200 samples. The geometric morphometric method for sex discrimination scored excellent, however, it did not largely outperformed traditional methods based on discrete measures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6837998/ /pubmed/31737620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302 Text en Copyright © 2019 Audenaert, Pattyn, Steenackers, De Roeck, Vandermeulen and Claes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Audenaert, E. A. Pattyn, C. Steenackers, G. De Roeck, J. Vandermeulen, D. Claes, P. Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry |
title | Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry |
title_full | Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry |
title_fullStr | Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry |
title_short | Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry |
title_sort | statistical shape modeling of skeletal anatomy for sex discrimination: their training size, sexual dimorphism, and asymmetry |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT audenaertea statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry AT pattync statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry AT steenackersg statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry AT deroeckj statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry AT vandermeulend statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry AT claesp statisticalshapemodelingofskeletalanatomyforsexdiscriminationtheirtrainingsizesexualdimorphismandasymmetry |