Cargando…

Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demetrashvili, Zaza, Kenchadze, George, Pipia, Irakli, Khutsishvili, Kakhi, Loladze, David, Ekaladze, Eka, Merabishvili, Giorgi, Kamkamidze, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016
_version_ 1783467207975501824
author Demetrashvili, Zaza
Kenchadze, George
Pipia, Irakli
Khutsishvili, Kakhi
Loladze, David
Ekaladze, Eka
Merabishvili, Giorgi
Kamkamidze, George
author_facet Demetrashvili, Zaza
Kenchadze, George
Pipia, Irakli
Khutsishvili, Kakhi
Loladze, David
Ekaladze, Eka
Merabishvili, Giorgi
Kamkamidze, George
author_sort Demetrashvili, Zaza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or abscess were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: the emergency surgery group and the conservative management group. The conservative management group was subdivided into two groups: interval surgery group and the ambulatory follow-up observation group without interval surgery. Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups. Among patients who underwent surgery, the surgical methods, operation time, postoperative hospitalization period, and post-surgical complications were analyzed. In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis was assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the emergency surgery group and interval surgery group revealed that the interval surgery group was characterized by shorter operation time (P = 0.008), a smallernumber of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and also shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009). In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis developed in 3 (13%) patients. US or CT-guided PCD was performed in all 3 patients on the conservative treatment stage. Comparing the interval surgery and recurrent appendicitis groups revealed statistically significant difference: operation time (P = 0.04) as well as postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.04) were shorter in recurrent appendicitis group. In 3 (4.1%) patients, the cause of the appendiceal mass was caecal cancer (2 cases) and Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment without interval surgery seems to be the preferred method for treatment of appendiceal mass and abscess. Patients can be operated on only in case of recurrence of appendicitis. US or CT PCD of appendiceal abscess presents the risk-factor for the development of recurrence of appendicitis. CT and colonoscopy within 4–6 weeks after completing the conservative treatment is recommended to be performed in all patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6838364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68383642019-11-12 Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study Demetrashvili, Zaza Kenchadze, George Pipia, Irakli Khutsishvili, Kakhi Loladze, David Ekaladze, Eka Merabishvili, Giorgi Kamkamidze, George Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or abscess were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: the emergency surgery group and the conservative management group. The conservative management group was subdivided into two groups: interval surgery group and the ambulatory follow-up observation group without interval surgery. Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups. Among patients who underwent surgery, the surgical methods, operation time, postoperative hospitalization period, and post-surgical complications were analyzed. In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis was assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the emergency surgery group and interval surgery group revealed that the interval surgery group was characterized by shorter operation time (P = 0.008), a smallernumber of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and also shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009). In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis developed in 3 (13%) patients. US or CT-guided PCD was performed in all 3 patients on the conservative treatment stage. Comparing the interval surgery and recurrent appendicitis groups revealed statistically significant difference: operation time (P = 0.04) as well as postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.04) were shorter in recurrent appendicitis group. In 3 (4.1%) patients, the cause of the appendiceal mass was caecal cancer (2 cases) and Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment without interval surgery seems to be the preferred method for treatment of appendiceal mass and abscess. Patients can be operated on only in case of recurrence of appendicitis. US or CT PCD of appendiceal abscess presents the risk-factor for the development of recurrence of appendicitis. CT and colonoscopy within 4–6 weeks after completing the conservative treatment is recommended to be performed in all patients. Elsevier 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6838364/ /pubmed/31719976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Demetrashvili, Zaza
Kenchadze, George
Pipia, Irakli
Khutsishvili, Kakhi
Loladze, David
Ekaladze, Eka
Merabishvili, Giorgi
Kamkamidze, George
Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
title Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016
work_keys_str_mv AT demetrashvilizaza comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kenchadzegeorge comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT pipiairakli comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT khutsishvilikakhi comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT loladzedavid comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ekaladzeeka comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT merabishviligiorgi comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kamkamidzegeorge comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy