Cargando…
Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or ab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016 |
_version_ | 1783467207975501824 |
---|---|
author | Demetrashvili, Zaza Kenchadze, George Pipia, Irakli Khutsishvili, Kakhi Loladze, David Ekaladze, Eka Merabishvili, Giorgi Kamkamidze, George |
author_facet | Demetrashvili, Zaza Kenchadze, George Pipia, Irakli Khutsishvili, Kakhi Loladze, David Ekaladze, Eka Merabishvili, Giorgi Kamkamidze, George |
author_sort | Demetrashvili, Zaza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or abscess were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: the emergency surgery group and the conservative management group. The conservative management group was subdivided into two groups: interval surgery group and the ambulatory follow-up observation group without interval surgery. Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups. Among patients who underwent surgery, the surgical methods, operation time, postoperative hospitalization period, and post-surgical complications were analyzed. In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis was assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the emergency surgery group and interval surgery group revealed that the interval surgery group was characterized by shorter operation time (P = 0.008), a smallernumber of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and also shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009). In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis developed in 3 (13%) patients. US or CT-guided PCD was performed in all 3 patients on the conservative treatment stage. Comparing the interval surgery and recurrent appendicitis groups revealed statistically significant difference: operation time (P = 0.04) as well as postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.04) were shorter in recurrent appendicitis group. In 3 (4.1%) patients, the cause of the appendiceal mass was caecal cancer (2 cases) and Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment without interval surgery seems to be the preferred method for treatment of appendiceal mass and abscess. Patients can be operated on only in case of recurrence of appendicitis. US or CT PCD of appendiceal abscess presents the risk-factor for the development of recurrence of appendicitis. CT and colonoscopy within 4–6 weeks after completing the conservative treatment is recommended to be performed in all patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6838364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68383642019-11-12 Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study Demetrashvili, Zaza Kenchadze, George Pipia, Irakli Khutsishvili, Kakhi Loladze, David Ekaladze, Eka Merabishvili, Giorgi Kamkamidze, George Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or abscess were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: the emergency surgery group and the conservative management group. The conservative management group was subdivided into two groups: interval surgery group and the ambulatory follow-up observation group without interval surgery. Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups. Among patients who underwent surgery, the surgical methods, operation time, postoperative hospitalization period, and post-surgical complications were analyzed. In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis was assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the emergency surgery group and interval surgery group revealed that the interval surgery group was characterized by shorter operation time (P = 0.008), a smallernumber of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and also shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009). In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis developed in 3 (13%) patients. US or CT-guided PCD was performed in all 3 patients on the conservative treatment stage. Comparing the interval surgery and recurrent appendicitis groups revealed statistically significant difference: operation time (P = 0.04) as well as postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.04) were shorter in recurrent appendicitis group. In 3 (4.1%) patients, the cause of the appendiceal mass was caecal cancer (2 cases) and Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment without interval surgery seems to be the preferred method for treatment of appendiceal mass and abscess. Patients can be operated on only in case of recurrence of appendicitis. US or CT PCD of appendiceal abscess presents the risk-factor for the development of recurrence of appendicitis. CT and colonoscopy within 4–6 weeks after completing the conservative treatment is recommended to be performed in all patients. Elsevier 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6838364/ /pubmed/31719976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Demetrashvili, Zaza Kenchadze, George Pipia, Irakli Khutsishvili, Kakhi Loladze, David Ekaladze, Eka Merabishvili, Giorgi Kamkamidze, George Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study |
title | Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demetrashvilizaza comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT kenchadzegeorge comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT pipiairakli comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT khutsishvilikakhi comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT loladzedavid comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT ekaladzeeka comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT merabishviligiorgi comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy AT kamkamidzegeorge comparisonoftreatmentmethodsofappendicealmassandabscessaprospectivecohortstudy |