Cargando…

Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature

It is commonly accepted that phonological codes can be activated parafoveally during reading and later used to aid foveal word recognition- a finding known as the phonological preview benefit. However, a closer look at the literature shows that this effect may be less consistent than what is sometim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasilev, Martin R., Yates, Mark, Slattery, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750415
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.87
_version_ 1783467281091657728
author Vasilev, Martin R.
Yates, Mark
Slattery, Timothy J.
author_facet Vasilev, Martin R.
Yates, Mark
Slattery, Timothy J.
author_sort Vasilev, Martin R.
collection PubMed
description It is commonly accepted that phonological codes can be activated parafoveally during reading and later used to aid foveal word recognition- a finding known as the phonological preview benefit. However, a closer look at the literature shows that this effect may be less consistent than what is sometimes believed. To determine the extent to which phonology is processed parafoveally, a Bayesian meta-analysis of 27 experiments and a survey of the unpublished literature were conducted. While the results were generally consistent with the phonological preview benefit (>90% probability of a true effect in gaze durations), the size of the effect was small. Readers of alphabetical orthographies obtained a modest benefit of only 4 ms in gaze durations. Interestingly, Chinese readers showed a larger effect (6–14 ms in size). There was no difference in the magnitude of the phonological preview benefit between homophone and pseudo-homophone previews, thus suggesting that the modest processing advantage is indeed related to the activation of phonological codes from the parafoveal word. Simulations revealed that the results are relatively robust to missing studies, although the effects may be 19–22% smaller if all missing studies found a null effect. The results suggest that while phonology can be processed parafoveally, this happens only to a limited extent. Because phonological priming effects in single-word recognition are small (10–13 ms; Rastle & Brysbaert, 2006) and there is a loss of visual acuity in the parafovea, it is argued that large phonological preview benefit effects may be unlikely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6838770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68387702019-11-20 Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature Vasilev, Martin R. Yates, Mark Slattery, Timothy J. J Cogn Review Article It is commonly accepted that phonological codes can be activated parafoveally during reading and later used to aid foveal word recognition- a finding known as the phonological preview benefit. However, a closer look at the literature shows that this effect may be less consistent than what is sometimes believed. To determine the extent to which phonology is processed parafoveally, a Bayesian meta-analysis of 27 experiments and a survey of the unpublished literature were conducted. While the results were generally consistent with the phonological preview benefit (>90% probability of a true effect in gaze durations), the size of the effect was small. Readers of alphabetical orthographies obtained a modest benefit of only 4 ms in gaze durations. Interestingly, Chinese readers showed a larger effect (6–14 ms in size). There was no difference in the magnitude of the phonological preview benefit between homophone and pseudo-homophone previews, thus suggesting that the modest processing advantage is indeed related to the activation of phonological codes from the parafoveal word. Simulations revealed that the results are relatively robust to missing studies, although the effects may be 19–22% smaller if all missing studies found a null effect. The results suggest that while phonology can be processed parafoveally, this happens only to a limited extent. Because phonological priming effects in single-word recognition are small (10–13 ms; Rastle & Brysbaert, 2006) and there is a loss of visual acuity in the parafovea, it is argued that large phonological preview benefit effects may be unlikely. Ubiquity Press 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6838770/ /pubmed/31750415 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.87 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Vasilev, Martin R.
Yates, Mark
Slattery, Timothy J.
Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature
title Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature
title_full Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature
title_fullStr Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature
title_full_unstemmed Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature
title_short Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature
title_sort do readers integrate phonological codes across saccades? a bayesian meta-analysis and a survey of the unpublished literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750415
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.87
work_keys_str_mv AT vasilevmartinr doreadersintegratephonologicalcodesacrosssaccadesabayesianmetaanalysisandasurveyoftheunpublishedliterature
AT yatesmark doreadersintegratephonologicalcodesacrosssaccadesabayesianmetaanalysisandasurveyoftheunpublishedliterature
AT slatterytimothyj doreadersintegratephonologicalcodesacrosssaccadesabayesianmetaanalysisandasurveyoftheunpublishedliterature