Cargando…

Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction

BACKGROUND: Modern pollution – pollution attributable to industrialization and urbanization – is responsible for nearly 6 million deaths per year, more than all the deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined; yet it receives comparatively little attention in the international development ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swinehart, Stephanie, Fuller, Richard, Kupka, Rachael, Conte, Marc N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750081
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2633
_version_ 1783467281328635904
author Swinehart, Stephanie
Fuller, Richard
Kupka, Rachael
Conte, Marc N.
author_facet Swinehart, Stephanie
Fuller, Richard
Kupka, Rachael
Conte, Marc N.
author_sort Swinehart, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modern pollution – pollution attributable to industrialization and urbanization – is responsible for nearly 6 million deaths per year, more than all the deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined; yet it receives comparatively little attention in the international development agenda [1]. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: This study attempts to highlight the funding disparity between select key threats to global health by quantifying the levels of international official development aid (ODA) allocated to reducing pollution’s negative impact on human health using a new metric – dollars spent per death caused by health threat. FINDINGS: Using only reported ODA spending for 2016, we calculate an average investment of $14/death for modern pollution, compared with $1,250/death for malaria, $190/death for tuberculosis, and $165/death for HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are substantive limitations to this analysis, results are sufficient to galvanize action to better monitor and track investments in modern pollution reduction. Donor countries have failed to respond to this urgent public health crisis. Given the severity of its public health burden, there is a critical need for funding to be allocated specifically to pollution reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6838771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68387712019-11-20 Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction Swinehart, Stephanie Fuller, Richard Kupka, Rachael Conte, Marc N. Ann Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Modern pollution – pollution attributable to industrialization and urbanization – is responsible for nearly 6 million deaths per year, more than all the deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined; yet it receives comparatively little attention in the international development agenda [1]. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: This study attempts to highlight the funding disparity between select key threats to global health by quantifying the levels of international official development aid (ODA) allocated to reducing pollution’s negative impact on human health using a new metric – dollars spent per death caused by health threat. FINDINGS: Using only reported ODA spending for 2016, we calculate an average investment of $14/death for modern pollution, compared with $1,250/death for malaria, $190/death for tuberculosis, and $165/death for HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are substantive limitations to this analysis, results are sufficient to galvanize action to better monitor and track investments in modern pollution reduction. Donor countries have failed to respond to this urgent public health crisis. Given the severity of its public health burden, there is a critical need for funding to be allocated specifically to pollution reduction. Ubiquity Press 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6838771/ /pubmed/31750081 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2633 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Swinehart, Stephanie
Fuller, Richard
Kupka, Rachael
Conte, Marc N.
Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
title Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
title_full Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
title_fullStr Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
title_short Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
title_sort rethinking aid allocation: analysis of official development spending on modern pollution reduction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750081
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2633
work_keys_str_mv AT swinehartstephanie rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction
AT fullerrichard rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction
AT kupkarachael rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction
AT contemarcn rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction