Cargando…
Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction
BACKGROUND: Modern pollution – pollution attributable to industrialization and urbanization – is responsible for nearly 6 million deaths per year, more than all the deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined; yet it receives comparatively little attention in the international development ag...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750081 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2633 |
_version_ | 1783467281328635904 |
---|---|
author | Swinehart, Stephanie Fuller, Richard Kupka, Rachael Conte, Marc N. |
author_facet | Swinehart, Stephanie Fuller, Richard Kupka, Rachael Conte, Marc N. |
author_sort | Swinehart, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Modern pollution – pollution attributable to industrialization and urbanization – is responsible for nearly 6 million deaths per year, more than all the deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined; yet it receives comparatively little attention in the international development agenda [1]. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: This study attempts to highlight the funding disparity between select key threats to global health by quantifying the levels of international official development aid (ODA) allocated to reducing pollution’s negative impact on human health using a new metric – dollars spent per death caused by health threat. FINDINGS: Using only reported ODA spending for 2016, we calculate an average investment of $14/death for modern pollution, compared with $1,250/death for malaria, $190/death for tuberculosis, and $165/death for HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are substantive limitations to this analysis, results are sufficient to galvanize action to better monitor and track investments in modern pollution reduction. Donor countries have failed to respond to this urgent public health crisis. Given the severity of its public health burden, there is a critical need for funding to be allocated specifically to pollution reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6838771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68387712019-11-20 Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction Swinehart, Stephanie Fuller, Richard Kupka, Rachael Conte, Marc N. Ann Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Modern pollution – pollution attributable to industrialization and urbanization – is responsible for nearly 6 million deaths per year, more than all the deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined; yet it receives comparatively little attention in the international development agenda [1]. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: This study attempts to highlight the funding disparity between select key threats to global health by quantifying the levels of international official development aid (ODA) allocated to reducing pollution’s negative impact on human health using a new metric – dollars spent per death caused by health threat. FINDINGS: Using only reported ODA spending for 2016, we calculate an average investment of $14/death for modern pollution, compared with $1,250/death for malaria, $190/death for tuberculosis, and $165/death for HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are substantive limitations to this analysis, results are sufficient to galvanize action to better monitor and track investments in modern pollution reduction. Donor countries have failed to respond to this urgent public health crisis. Given the severity of its public health burden, there is a critical need for funding to be allocated specifically to pollution reduction. Ubiquity Press 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6838771/ /pubmed/31750081 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2633 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Swinehart, Stephanie Fuller, Richard Kupka, Rachael Conte, Marc N. Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction |
title | Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction |
title_full | Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction |
title_fullStr | Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction |
title_short | Rethinking Aid Allocation: Analysis of Official Development Spending on Modern Pollution Reduction |
title_sort | rethinking aid allocation: analysis of official development spending on modern pollution reduction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750081 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swinehartstephanie rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction AT fullerrichard rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction AT kupkarachael rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction AT contemarcn rethinkingaidallocationanalysisofofficialdevelopmentspendingonmodernpollutionreduction |