Cargando…

The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence

Numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated experience-induced plasticity in the primary sensory cortex, indicating that repeated decisions could modulate sensory processing. In this context, we investigated whether an auditory version of the monetary incentive delay (MID) task could change the neu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krugliakova, Elena, Gorin, Alexey, Fedele, Tommaso, Shtyrov, Yury, Moiseeva, Victoria, Klucharev, Vasily, Shestakova, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00382
_version_ 1783467328684425216
author Krugliakova, Elena
Gorin, Alexey
Fedele, Tommaso
Shtyrov, Yury
Moiseeva, Victoria
Klucharev, Vasily
Shestakova, Anna
author_facet Krugliakova, Elena
Gorin, Alexey
Fedele, Tommaso
Shtyrov, Yury
Moiseeva, Victoria
Klucharev, Vasily
Shestakova, Anna
author_sort Krugliakova, Elena
collection PubMed
description Numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated experience-induced plasticity in the primary sensory cortex, indicating that repeated decisions could modulate sensory processing. In this context, we investigated whether an auditory version of the monetary incentive delay (MID) task could change the neural processing of the incentive cues that code expected monetary outcomes. To study sensory plasticity, we presented the incentive cues as deviants during oddball sessions recorded before and after training in the two MID task sessions. We found that after 2 days of training in the MID task, incentive cues evoked a larger P3a (compared with the baseline condition), indicating there was an enhancement of the involuntary attention to the stimuli that predict rewards. At the individual level, the training-induced change of mismatch-related negativity was correlated with the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) recorded during the first MID task session. Our results show that the MID task evokes plasticity changes in the auditory system associated with better passive discrimination of incentive cues and with enhanced involuntary attention switching towards these cues. Thus, the sensory processing of incentive cues is dynamically modulated by previous outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68390452019-11-15 The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence Krugliakova, Elena Gorin, Alexey Fedele, Tommaso Shtyrov, Yury Moiseeva, Victoria Klucharev, Vasily Shestakova, Anna Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated experience-induced plasticity in the primary sensory cortex, indicating that repeated decisions could modulate sensory processing. In this context, we investigated whether an auditory version of the monetary incentive delay (MID) task could change the neural processing of the incentive cues that code expected monetary outcomes. To study sensory plasticity, we presented the incentive cues as deviants during oddball sessions recorded before and after training in the two MID task sessions. We found that after 2 days of training in the MID task, incentive cues evoked a larger P3a (compared with the baseline condition), indicating there was an enhancement of the involuntary attention to the stimuli that predict rewards. At the individual level, the training-induced change of mismatch-related negativity was correlated with the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) recorded during the first MID task session. Our results show that the MID task evokes plasticity changes in the auditory system associated with better passive discrimination of incentive cues and with enhanced involuntary attention switching towards these cues. Thus, the sensory processing of incentive cues is dynamically modulated by previous outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6839045/ /pubmed/31736730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00382 Text en Copyright © 2019 Krugliakova, Gorin, Fedele, Shtyrov, Moiseeva, Klucharev and Shestakova. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Krugliakova, Elena
Gorin, Alexey
Fedele, Tommaso
Shtyrov, Yury
Moiseeva, Victoria
Klucharev, Vasily
Shestakova, Anna
The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
title The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
title_full The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
title_fullStr The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
title_full_unstemmed The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
title_short The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
title_sort monetary incentive delay (mid) task induces changes in sensory processing: erp evidence
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00382
work_keys_str_mv AT krugliakovaelena themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT gorinalexey themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT fedeletommaso themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT shtyrovyury themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT moiseevavictoria themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT klucharevvasily themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT shestakovaanna themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT krugliakovaelena monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT gorinalexey monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT fedeletommaso monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT shtyrovyury monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT moiseevavictoria monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT klucharevvasily monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence
AT shestakovaanna monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence