Cargando…
The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence
Numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated experience-induced plasticity in the primary sensory cortex, indicating that repeated decisions could modulate sensory processing. In this context, we investigated whether an auditory version of the monetary incentive delay (MID) task could change the neu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00382 |
_version_ | 1783467328684425216 |
---|---|
author | Krugliakova, Elena Gorin, Alexey Fedele, Tommaso Shtyrov, Yury Moiseeva, Victoria Klucharev, Vasily Shestakova, Anna |
author_facet | Krugliakova, Elena Gorin, Alexey Fedele, Tommaso Shtyrov, Yury Moiseeva, Victoria Klucharev, Vasily Shestakova, Anna |
author_sort | Krugliakova, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated experience-induced plasticity in the primary sensory cortex, indicating that repeated decisions could modulate sensory processing. In this context, we investigated whether an auditory version of the monetary incentive delay (MID) task could change the neural processing of the incentive cues that code expected monetary outcomes. To study sensory plasticity, we presented the incentive cues as deviants during oddball sessions recorded before and after training in the two MID task sessions. We found that after 2 days of training in the MID task, incentive cues evoked a larger P3a (compared with the baseline condition), indicating there was an enhancement of the involuntary attention to the stimuli that predict rewards. At the individual level, the training-induced change of mismatch-related negativity was correlated with the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) recorded during the first MID task session. Our results show that the MID task evokes plasticity changes in the auditory system associated with better passive discrimination of incentive cues and with enhanced involuntary attention switching towards these cues. Thus, the sensory processing of incentive cues is dynamically modulated by previous outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6839045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68390452019-11-15 The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence Krugliakova, Elena Gorin, Alexey Fedele, Tommaso Shtyrov, Yury Moiseeva, Victoria Klucharev, Vasily Shestakova, Anna Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated experience-induced plasticity in the primary sensory cortex, indicating that repeated decisions could modulate sensory processing. In this context, we investigated whether an auditory version of the monetary incentive delay (MID) task could change the neural processing of the incentive cues that code expected monetary outcomes. To study sensory plasticity, we presented the incentive cues as deviants during oddball sessions recorded before and after training in the two MID task sessions. We found that after 2 days of training in the MID task, incentive cues evoked a larger P3a (compared with the baseline condition), indicating there was an enhancement of the involuntary attention to the stimuli that predict rewards. At the individual level, the training-induced change of mismatch-related negativity was correlated with the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) recorded during the first MID task session. Our results show that the MID task evokes plasticity changes in the auditory system associated with better passive discrimination of incentive cues and with enhanced involuntary attention switching towards these cues. Thus, the sensory processing of incentive cues is dynamically modulated by previous outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6839045/ /pubmed/31736730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00382 Text en Copyright © 2019 Krugliakova, Gorin, Fedele, Shtyrov, Moiseeva, Klucharev and Shestakova. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Krugliakova, Elena Gorin, Alexey Fedele, Tommaso Shtyrov, Yury Moiseeva, Victoria Klucharev, Vasily Shestakova, Anna The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence |
title | The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence |
title_full | The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence |
title_fullStr | The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence |
title_short | The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence |
title_sort | monetary incentive delay (mid) task induces changes in sensory processing: erp evidence |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krugliakovaelena themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT gorinalexey themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT fedeletommaso themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT shtyrovyury themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT moiseevavictoria themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT klucharevvasily themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT shestakovaanna themonetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT krugliakovaelena monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT gorinalexey monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT fedeletommaso monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT shtyrovyury monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT moiseevavictoria monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT klucharevvasily monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence AT shestakovaanna monetaryincentivedelaymidtaskinduceschangesinsensoryprocessingerpevidence |