Cargando…
Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that rates of hearing loss are increasing more rapidly than the capacity of traditional audiometry resources for screening. A novel innovation in tablet, self-administered portable audiometry has been proposed as a solution to this discordance. The primary ob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0385-0 |
_version_ | 1783467341968834560 |
---|---|
author | Bastianelli, Mark Mark, Amy E. McAfee, Arran Schramm, David Lefrançois, Renée Bromwich, Matthew |
author_facet | Bastianelli, Mark Mark, Amy E. McAfee, Arran Schramm, David Lefrançois, Renée Bromwich, Matthew |
author_sort | Bastianelli, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that rates of hearing loss are increasing more rapidly than the capacity of traditional audiometry resources for screening. A novel innovation in tablet, self-administered portable audiometry has been proposed as a solution to this discordance. The primary objective of this study was to validate a tablet audiometer with adult patients in a clinical setting. Secondarily, word recognition with a tablet audiometer was compared against conventional audiometry. METHODS: Three distinct prospective adult cohorts underwent testing. In group 1 and group 2 testing with the automated tablet audiometer was compared to standard sound booth audiometry. In Group 1, participants’ pure tone thresholds were measured with an automated tablet audiometer in a quiet clinic exam room. In Group 2, participants completed monosyllabic word recognition testing using the NU-6 word lists. In Group 3, internal reliability was tested by having participants perform two automated tablet audiometric evaluation in sequence. RESULTS: Group 1 included 40 patients mean age was 54.7 ± 18.4 years old and 60% female; Group 2 included 44 participants mean age was 55.2 ± 14.8 years old and 68.2% female; Group 3 included 40 participants with mean age of 39.4 + 15.9 years old and 60.5% female. In Group 1, compared to standard audiometry, 95.7% (95% CI: 92.6–98.9%) of thresholds were within 10 dB. In Group 2, comparing word recognition results, 96.2% (95% CI: 89.5–98.7%) were clinically equivalent and within a critical difference range. In Group 3, One-way Intraclass Correlation for agreement for the both left- and right-ear pure tone average was 0.98. The mean difference between repeat assessments was 0 (SD = 2.1) in the left ear, and 0.1 (SD = 1.1) in the right ear. CONCLUSION: Puretone audiometry and word recognition testing appears valid when performed by non-healthcare experts using a tablet audiometer outside a sound booth in a quiet environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02761798. Registered April, 2016 < https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02761798> |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6839098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68390982019-11-12 Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer Bastianelli, Mark Mark, Amy E. McAfee, Arran Schramm, David Lefrançois, Renée Bromwich, Matthew J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that rates of hearing loss are increasing more rapidly than the capacity of traditional audiometry resources for screening. A novel innovation in tablet, self-administered portable audiometry has been proposed as a solution to this discordance. The primary objective of this study was to validate a tablet audiometer with adult patients in a clinical setting. Secondarily, word recognition with a tablet audiometer was compared against conventional audiometry. METHODS: Three distinct prospective adult cohorts underwent testing. In group 1 and group 2 testing with the automated tablet audiometer was compared to standard sound booth audiometry. In Group 1, participants’ pure tone thresholds were measured with an automated tablet audiometer in a quiet clinic exam room. In Group 2, participants completed monosyllabic word recognition testing using the NU-6 word lists. In Group 3, internal reliability was tested by having participants perform two automated tablet audiometric evaluation in sequence. RESULTS: Group 1 included 40 patients mean age was 54.7 ± 18.4 years old and 60% female; Group 2 included 44 participants mean age was 55.2 ± 14.8 years old and 68.2% female; Group 3 included 40 participants with mean age of 39.4 + 15.9 years old and 60.5% female. In Group 1, compared to standard audiometry, 95.7% (95% CI: 92.6–98.9%) of thresholds were within 10 dB. In Group 2, comparing word recognition results, 96.2% (95% CI: 89.5–98.7%) were clinically equivalent and within a critical difference range. In Group 3, One-way Intraclass Correlation for agreement for the both left- and right-ear pure tone average was 0.98. The mean difference between repeat assessments was 0 (SD = 2.1) in the left ear, and 0.1 (SD = 1.1) in the right ear. CONCLUSION: Puretone audiometry and word recognition testing appears valid when performed by non-healthcare experts using a tablet audiometer outside a sound booth in a quiet environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02761798. Registered April, 2016 < https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02761798> BioMed Central 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6839098/ /pubmed/31699157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0385-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Bastianelli, Mark Mark, Amy E. McAfee, Arran Schramm, David Lefrançois, Renée Bromwich, Matthew Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
title | Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
title_full | Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
title_fullStr | Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
title_full_unstemmed | Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
title_short | Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
title_sort | adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0385-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastianellimark adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer AT markamye adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer AT mcafeearran adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer AT schrammdavid adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer AT lefrancoisrenee adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer AT bromwichmatthew adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer |