Cargando…

Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer

BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that rates of hearing loss are increasing more rapidly than the capacity of traditional audiometry resources for screening. A novel innovation in tablet, self-administered portable audiometry has been proposed as a solution to this discordance. The primary ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bastianelli, Mark, Mark, Amy E., McAfee, Arran, Schramm, David, Lefrançois, Renée, Bromwich, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0385-0
_version_ 1783467341968834560
author Bastianelli, Mark
Mark, Amy E.
McAfee, Arran
Schramm, David
Lefrançois, Renée
Bromwich, Matthew
author_facet Bastianelli, Mark
Mark, Amy E.
McAfee, Arran
Schramm, David
Lefrançois, Renée
Bromwich, Matthew
author_sort Bastianelli, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that rates of hearing loss are increasing more rapidly than the capacity of traditional audiometry resources for screening. A novel innovation in tablet, self-administered portable audiometry has been proposed as a solution to this discordance. The primary objective of this study was to validate a tablet audiometer with adult patients in a clinical setting. Secondarily, word recognition with a tablet audiometer was compared against conventional audiometry. METHODS: Three distinct prospective adult cohorts underwent testing. In group 1 and group 2 testing with the automated tablet audiometer was compared to standard sound booth audiometry. In Group 1, participants’ pure tone thresholds were measured with an automated tablet audiometer in a quiet clinic exam room. In Group 2, participants completed monosyllabic word recognition testing using the NU-6 word lists. In Group 3, internal reliability was tested by having participants perform two automated tablet audiometric evaluation in sequence. RESULTS: Group 1 included 40 patients mean age was 54.7 ± 18.4 years old and 60% female; Group 2 included 44 participants mean age was 55.2 ± 14.8 years old and 68.2% female; Group 3 included 40 participants with mean age of 39.4 + 15.9 years old and 60.5% female. In Group 1, compared to standard audiometry, 95.7% (95% CI: 92.6–98.9%) of thresholds were within 10 dB. In Group 2, comparing word recognition results, 96.2% (95% CI: 89.5–98.7%) were clinically equivalent and within a critical difference range. In Group 3, One-way Intraclass Correlation for agreement for the both left- and right-ear pure tone average was 0.98. The mean difference between repeat assessments was 0 (SD = 2.1) in the left ear, and 0.1 (SD = 1.1) in the right ear. CONCLUSION: Puretone audiometry and word recognition testing appears valid when performed by non-healthcare experts using a tablet audiometer outside a sound booth in a quiet environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02761798. Registered April, 2016 < https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02761798>
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68390982019-11-12 Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer Bastianelli, Mark Mark, Amy E. McAfee, Arran Schramm, David Lefrançois, Renée Bromwich, Matthew J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that rates of hearing loss are increasing more rapidly than the capacity of traditional audiometry resources for screening. A novel innovation in tablet, self-administered portable audiometry has been proposed as a solution to this discordance. The primary objective of this study was to validate a tablet audiometer with adult patients in a clinical setting. Secondarily, word recognition with a tablet audiometer was compared against conventional audiometry. METHODS: Three distinct prospective adult cohorts underwent testing. In group 1 and group 2 testing with the automated tablet audiometer was compared to standard sound booth audiometry. In Group 1, participants’ pure tone thresholds were measured with an automated tablet audiometer in a quiet clinic exam room. In Group 2, participants completed monosyllabic word recognition testing using the NU-6 word lists. In Group 3, internal reliability was tested by having participants perform two automated tablet audiometric evaluation in sequence. RESULTS: Group 1 included 40 patients mean age was 54.7 ± 18.4 years old and 60% female; Group 2 included 44 participants mean age was 55.2 ± 14.8 years old and 68.2% female; Group 3 included 40 participants with mean age of 39.4 + 15.9 years old and 60.5% female. In Group 1, compared to standard audiometry, 95.7% (95% CI: 92.6–98.9%) of thresholds were within 10 dB. In Group 2, comparing word recognition results, 96.2% (95% CI: 89.5–98.7%) were clinically equivalent and within a critical difference range. In Group 3, One-way Intraclass Correlation for agreement for the both left- and right-ear pure tone average was 0.98. The mean difference between repeat assessments was 0 (SD = 2.1) in the left ear, and 0.1 (SD = 1.1) in the right ear. CONCLUSION: Puretone audiometry and word recognition testing appears valid when performed by non-healthcare experts using a tablet audiometer outside a sound booth in a quiet environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02761798. Registered April, 2016 < https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02761798> BioMed Central 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6839098/ /pubmed/31699157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0385-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bastianelli, Mark
Mark, Amy E.
McAfee, Arran
Schramm, David
Lefrançois, Renée
Bromwich, Matthew
Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
title Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
title_full Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
title_fullStr Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
title_full_unstemmed Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
title_short Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
title_sort adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0385-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bastianellimark adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer
AT markamye adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer
AT mcafeearran adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer
AT schrammdavid adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer
AT lefrancoisrenee adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer
AT bromwichmatthew adultvalidationofaselfadministeredtabletaudiometer